Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Mike DiRucci]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Never heard of a "gay cult" yet.
Never heard of a brother wanting to marry his sister either.
Incestuious marriages??? Never heard of one of those either.
Harm in polygamy?I could give a shit LESS if some fool thinks it would be fun to marry 3 women. Good God...the man might commit suicide within the span of 2 years. As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were minors and knew of each other.
Grasp for straws somewhere else punk.

You are for polygamy "As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were minors and knew of each other."

I am for same sex marriage "As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were (not) minors and knew of each other."

See how bigoted you are Dan? Do you get it yet dummy?

[Mike DiRucci]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Never heard of a "gay cult" yet.
Never heard of a brother wanting to marry his sister either.
Incestuious marriages??? Never heard of one of those either.
Harm in polygamy?I could give a shit LESS if some fool thinks it would be fun to marry 3 women. Good God...the man might commit suicide within the span of 2 years. As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were minors and knew of each other.
Grasp for straws somewhere else punk.

Someone entering into a same sex marriage might commit suicide within two years too Dan. Do you have a point beyond bigotry?

[mamalisa68]

what ever happened to the vote of the majority.....the people have spoken. This is just another example of the "powers that be" taking things into thier own hands. Sooooo tired of the government........

[Mike DiRucci]

Imprtnrd wrote:

<quoted text>I see you were to lazy to look it up. You know....Google it. No harm at all to me, I could care less jackass. ROTFL@U. Polygamy is a separate issue. Let 10 of them marry if they want. You should look in the mirror and say....WHAT A DOPE! LOL

I looked it up Fruitloops. Says "polygamy is illegal". Is that really your argument against it genius? Same sex marriage is effectively illegal in most states too. You won't got to prison for it like a polygamist would but you cannot do it. You're a dope.

Look in the mirror you greasy little schtick copying bigot!

FUNNY!

[Bruno]

mamalisa68 wrote:

what ever happened to the vote of the majority.....the people have spoken. This is just another example of the "powers that be" taking things into thier own hands. Sooooo tired of the government........

They did vote, idiots voting for idiots, that is why we have irresponsible idiots in Government today

[Mike DiRucci]

Still waiting for a compelling argument against three men or three women or a mixture of genders marrying. And throw in one against incest marriage while you're at it.

Dan?

Imprtnrd?

Quest?

Hello? Hello?

TOO Funny!

[RiccardoFire]

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Since when were generalist unsupported baseless claims 'rational and lucid'?
LOL!!!
The only thing you brought to show and tell was your opinion dumbfuck.

How would you identify yourself in the level of politics? Liberal? Conservative? middle? Just curious.

[Winston Smiths dog]

Prop 8 is Law wrote:

<quoted text>You actually think that your mind is polluted because of abuse. Well, gays telling you that you can't have therapy is abuse.
Now, please document 10 cases since Matthew Shepard of physical abuse. We won't address mental abuse, because you think that being asked this question is mental abuse. It makes you have to think.

WTF are you babbling about?

Are you claiming that people don't pick on people simply because they're gay? When I was in high school there were a few gays in my class. We (as in just about EVERYONE, including me) picked on them regularly. I grew up and didn't continue the behavior. Yet I know plenty of people who are more than happy to continue the abuse.

http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2009/data/table_01....

[Mike DiRucci]

Winston Smiths dog wrote:

<quoted text>
WTF are you babbling about?
Are you claiming that people don't pick on people simply because they're gay? When I was in high school there were a few gays in my class. We (as in just about EVERYONE, including me) picked on them regularly. I grew up and didn't continue the behavior. Yet I know plenty of people who are more than happy to continue the abuse.
http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2009/data/table_01....

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Spinnerits]

The holiday season is coming.

[Dan C]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes Dan, we have all suffered through your posts. You are very good at dancing, but not very good at reality.
You are like Rose, trying to speak in all kinds of cryptic terms, trying to leave yourselves a way out of all of your nonsense by attempting to never really commit to anything. The problem is, neither of you are intelligent enough to do so, and not one person is falling for your nonsense.
You cannot claim that you are for equal rights on one hand, and then deny those right's on the other. You cannot claim that it is OK to deny right's from one group because of- A,B,C- and then claim you cannot deny those same right's from another group because A,B,C does not apply to them.
You don't get a pass on being a bigot because you are in favor of same sex marriage anymore than a black person gets a pass on being a racist because of the color of their skin.

"Cryptic terms"....LOL!!!!

BTW genius....I never denied anyone from getting married albeit I threw a few hints towards my buddy Tom before he got hitched witgh the Wicked Witch of the West back in the mid-80's.

Poor Tom. Son of a gun hasn't been able to keep his head up since.

[Dan C]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
No. Equal rights are equal rights. Your bigotry against polygamists is not a "separate entity".
What a dope!

Fabricate much.

How's the social life BTW.

LOL!!!

[Dan C]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Someone entering into a same sex marriage might commit suicide within two years too Dan. Do you have a point beyond bigotry?

Shit son....my first marriage brought me closer to thinking about taking the station wagon into the garage and closing the door while it ran 92 octane gas in park whilst I drank a liter of Drano shortly after slitting my wrists and lighting the fuse to a stick of TNT all the while balancing my big toe on the hair trigger of a double barrelled 12 gauge shotgun which was supporting my chin.

BAH HAH HAH!!!!

Thank God I didn't given my beautiful little woman was in my future.

Give it a rest idiot....if you're going to play games buy a set of checkers and find a friend if you can manage one.

[Imprtnrd]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

Still waiting for a compelling argument against three men or three women or a mixture of genders marrying. And throw in one against incest marriage while you're at it.
Dan?
Imprtnrd?
Quest?
Hello? Hello?
TOO Funny!

Ya, too funny. There is no argument. Told you that already. DUH!

[Dan C]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You are for polygamy "As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were minors and knew of each other."
I am for same sex marriage "As long as those women were no coerced through cult surroundings, were (not) minors and knew of each other."
See how bigoted you are Dan? Do you get it yet dummy?

Err.....there was no bigotry demonstrated in your post.

FYI.

[InArow]

Bingo, you win again.

[Dan C]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>How would you identify yourself in the level of politics? Liberal? Conservative? middle? Just curious.

I don't.

I have a set of beliefs but in that set many of my friends who consider themselves part of the Tea Party do not agree, many of my friends that consider themselves Republican do not agree and many tree hugging Liberal Democrats don't like many of my stances.

As to date I've always voted Republican but the fact I support gay marriage can be argued by many I don't stand up for their beliefs.

For starters I think the Tea Party and many "Christian Republicans" forget we live in a nation which espouses freedom of religion and I tire of the drumbeat that we are 'Christian nation' but I also agree to their thoughts on illegal immigration, business, the joke of 'Obama Health Care', etc.

I'm not a "pro-lifer" either albeit abortion is a tricky subject given I don't think it should be used as a form of loose birth control either.

I don't think many Liberals have a firm understanding of how business nor world affairs needs to be run successfully.

Politics involves itself in many aspects and each one is succinct and different therefore I hold views on each. Most of those I voted for did not carry all my beliefs but if they were able to hold more than the opposing party they obviously gained my vote.

When dealing with this gay rights issue of marriage it's seen as a liberal point of view so really it matters little what one is labeled given many of my views would be seen as conservative.

You?

[Dan C]

Imprtnrd wrote:

<quoted text>Ya, too funny. There is no argument. Told you that already. DUH!

Mike DiDumbass keeps harboring this idea I have something against polygamy when in fact it's a non-issue.

What we did is bust his neat little egg in thinking he can play out as if he supports gay marriage but by doing so he then supports polygamy and if we don't then we are in turn hypocrites given we are for one format of marriage but not another when in fact I could care less if Mormon Moe wants to marry a harem of women.

The guy is a complete idiot.

[FouledUp]

If the once shaved and made to walk backwards, GOP, Republicans and Tea Party Nation fools are once again barking up the wrong tree with their silly ideas of fixing the tax problems of The United States of America.

Republicans offered up their own proposal to avert the impending “fiscal cliff” but it looks and sounds crazy, the numbers don't add up.

The whole set of plans submitted by the GOP, Republicans are fouled up.

[Dan C]

mamalisa68 wrote:

what ever happened to the vote of the majority.....the people have spoken. This is just another example of the "powers that be" taking things into thier own hands. Sooooo tired of the government........

You don't vote out individual rights of American citizens.

Pretty simple concept and if you had an IQ above that of a snapping turtle walking off a cliff because it thought it could fly you'd get it.

You no doubt probably have freedoms and liberties you enjoy as an American but might not be wildly popular so in turn if we deny gays the ability to marry based on a vote then can we vote on your individual freedoms?