Marriage laws at their core exist to tie men to responsibility to their children.
A gay person cannot be put in this position. He/she cannot abandon his/her offspring that were naturally created with a same sex partner.
Marriage is about responsibility, not privilege. Each party has a duty to the other.
Traditionally the man had the responsibility to provide and protect and women had to be faithful and nurture. The laws were designed to support the natural order.
Homosexual relations cannot be part of this natural order because they do not give life and do not need protection the same way that life giving relations do.
What idiotic gay twirl!<quoted text>
Odd isn't it that a significant number of fathers beat, kill or leave their offspring.
And they don't care if they leave the marriage.
Given that doesn't it make your ignorant blanket statement as dumb as claiming Florida oranges are in the animal kingdom?
"A SIGNIFICANT number of fathers beat, kill or leave"?
What would that have to do with the facts I stated? You have no answer so you make a ad homoan attack with a twist of lie?
Please, be specific, how does your claim related to any specific point I made.
As to yours, speaking of oranges in the animal kingdom, FAR less fathers beat, kill or leave their children than do non-biological substitutes. Ever hear of the Cinderella Effect?
Furthermore, those behaviors are in conflict with every single aspect of fatherhood and masculinity. A severe disqualification.
No LOL, but Smirk.