Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,443)

Showing posts 148,841 - 148,860 of199,080
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
ReTardo

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169903
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

ReTardo should only be used by idiots who can't stand anyone being happy.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169904
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't say this:
"You can point them out. And you can see their relevance illustrated.
Your problem is you cannot successfully argue the facts brought to your doorstep.
No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant. Add to that the only things people are concerned about if you can actually find polygamists is that they not coerce, marry underage kiddies or use methods of brainwashing in their practice of polygamy....no different than any other marriage moron.
Your inner bigot came out a long time ago with your sad effort at staining gay marriage so I'd shaddup hypocrit."
Seriously Dan, if you can't keep up with your own nonsense, how do you expect anyone else to?
Err...

...Here's what you stated in the post of which I was referring to;

"So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?
Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.
Congratulations moron."

Again...no one gives a shit if polygamists get married.

I'll say it again...no one cares if polygamists get married.

Third time since you're fucking stupid...no one cares if polygamists get married.

---Where did I state they should be denied getting married because of their numbers moron.

You lying sack of shit.

I'd bet hard earned money you can't hold a job longer than 3 months because your reasoning is so polluted.

Am I right??

LOL!!!
Troll

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169905
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Danno Rue, what keeps your bait fresh?

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169906
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KochNUTS wrote:
Look you sick frigging fools, the GOP, Republicans and Tea Party Idiots have and are driving this country in to the sea with their stupid ideas.
A bunch of Koch Brothers followers.
They would much rather drink the Fox News cool aid than admit they are wrong.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169907
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah....I'm familiar with Constitution and the introduction of the Amendments by our Founding Fathers in that they knew there would be aspects dealing with the freedoms of Americans that would come up.
Wow, rant much?

That's interesting considering as a whole, the founding fathers only passed and ratified 10 Amendment's. And not one of them mentions "harm".

Try to stick to the topic. The question was simple- where did the founders mention "Harm" as a reason for the federal government to eliminate an inalienable right?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169908
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
England has succession. When one king or queen dies another monarch is set to take it's place.
They do, however, have a parliment which holds sway over most governmental duties and which is democratic in nature so their royal monarchy is only there for appearances and national pride.
The only succession here might be when a father that founded a company hands over the reigns to his offspring.
As far as "believing" in it, I know it exists.
Pretty stupid question to ask in a thread about gays marrying though given it holds no relevance.
Nice side-step jackass. If you don't want to discuss secession perhaps you shouldn't bring up the civil war.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169909
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
And no genius...succession dealt with the monarchy of the country we severed ties with during our revolution in the late 1700's.
Our Founding Fathers believed in democracy moron.
Our founders HATED democracy you MORON!!! That's why they created a REPUBLIC!!!!

Get a clue.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169910
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Err...
...Here's what you stated in the post of which I was referring to;
"So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?
Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.
Congratulations moron."
I know what I said you fucking twit, it is you whom is having trouble with your own position. That must be why you are so angry..

"No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant."

Like you say, their numbers are so small who gives a sh$$ about them.

Poor Dan, such a bigot.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169911
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Wat the Tyler wrote:
<quoted text>
They would much rather drink the Fox News cool aid than admit they are wrong.
Yawn.. Because that Obama Kool Aid is much sweeter..

BTW, it's KOOL not COOL. You should at least learn how to spell your nonsense.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169912
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice side-step jackass. If you don't want to discuss secession perhaps you shouldn't bring up the civil war.
You never mentioned 'secession'.

You advised of 'succession' dumbfuck.

Your post #169895;

"So you do not believe in the right of succession?

---Go to school, you ignorant moron before entering any more posts....really.

Because as it is you're just being stupid.

Our founders did."
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169913
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, rant much?
That's interesting considering as a whole, the founding fathers only passed and ratified 10 Amendment's. And not one of them mentions "harm".
Try to stick to the topic. The question was simple- where did the founders mention "Harm" as a reason for the federal government to eliminate an inalienable right?
There are more than ten Amendments to the Constitution. And freedoms are duly argued in regards to harm they may cause.

You sir are a complete fool.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169914
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what I said you fucking twit, it is you whom is having trouble with your own position. That must be why you are so angry..
"No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant."
Like you say, their numbers are so small who gives a sh$$ about them.
Poor Dan, such a bigot.
I have no reason to be angry.

I'm not gay.

I instead give you facts and you in turn play games.

You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169915
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Our founders HATED democracy you MORON!!! That's why they created a REPUBLIC!!!!
Get a clue.
Based on the principles set forth by democratic means.

I don't think you're up to arguing the Constitution given you cannot even identify the elements of a bsaic civil right let alone know how many Amendments there are or how they were formed.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169916
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice side-step jackass. If you don't want to discuss secession perhaps you shouldn't bring up the civil war.
By the way genius....I never brought up the Civil War.

This thread is about gays marrying MORON....LOL!!!!

You are the DUMBEST Mo-Fo yet!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169917
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You never mentioned 'secession'.
You advised of 'succession' dumbfuck.
Your post #169895;
"So you do not believe in the right of succession?
---Go to school, you ignorant moron before entering any more posts....really.
Because as it is you're just being stupid.
Our founders did."
If you would like me to point out all of your typo's I would be more than happy to Dan- but since your posts are so consistently full of sh$$ I figured I would focus on that.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169918
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
There are more than ten Amendments to the Constitution. And freedoms are duly argued in regards to harm they may cause.
You sir are a complete fool.
You are the fool. The first 10 Amendment are the ONLY Amendments that the "founders" drafted and Ratified as a collective.

I am sorry that you have a reading comprehension problem.

And again, where did the founders mention "harm" when they mentioned inalienable right's?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169919
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no reason to be angry.
I'm not gay.
I will let people stew on that statement for a bit.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169920
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
You reached that point years ago, yet here we are.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169921
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on the principles set forth by democratic means.
I don't think you're up to arguing the Constitution given you cannot even identify the elements of a bsaic civil right let alone know how many Amendments there are or how they were formed.
So yo are still claiming what the founders gave us was a "Democracy"?

And you are the one saying I am clueless..

You are in dire need of a history lesson my friend.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169922
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way genius....I never brought up the Civil War.
This thread is about gays marrying MORON....LOL!!!!
You are the DUMBEST Mo-Fo yet!
Poor Dan.

Doesn't realize that when he rants on about- Lincoln, Slavery, the southern states, and the 13th Amendment- that he is discussing the Civil War.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 148,841 - 148,860 of199,080
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••