Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Manuel]

Next time read the instruction on how to use a sex manuel

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
4.‘Gay Marriage’ is founded on a false understanding of homosexuality.
California's ‘gay marriage’ decision was founded on a 1948 Court decision (Perez vs. Sharp) to strike down a state ban on interracial marriages. That means today’s Court tends to equate ethnicity with homosexuality. Bad reasoning. Unlike ethnicity, homosexuality is neither genetically-based nor immutable.
Same-sex attraction is a three-fold cord of nature, nurture, and culture, all bound together by one’s moral decisions. The fact is: many choose to change their homosexuality, and find peace and purpose in heterosexual relationships.‘Gay marriage’ advocates refuse that truth and insist that homosexuality is destiny, which is a false understanding.
5.‘Gay Marriage’ makes its opponents racists.
Based on #4, those who oppose gay marriage will be seen as bigots.‘Gay marriage’ validates as normal and good the problematic, complex condition of same-sex attraction; all who choose to view that attraction as a problem not a birthright will inevitably be accorded the same social shame and even legal consequences that racists incur.
6.‘Gay Marriage’ encourages and increases homosexual behavior.
Over the last 50 years, homosexual behavior has increased due to media advocacy, our culture of divorce, porn, and promiscuity, and the greater economic and emotional independence of women from men. Validating ‘gay marriage’ will further encourage men and women to explore homosexual unions.
Social shame used to inhibit homosexual experimentation; ‘gay marriage’ casts off the last restraint, and increases homosexual behavior in our society. Between 1995 and 2005, lesbian unions in the USA increased 7 times, while male unions doubled.
7.‘Gay Marriage’ opens the door to other types of ‘marriage.’
In changing the meaning of marriage to include infidelity and gender sameness,‘gay marriage’ sets a precedent for other types of units, like incest and polygamy. Legal cases involving polygamy now invoke the same legal precedents of gay rights advocates. What seemed unthinkable 10 years ago is now ‘gay marriage’ law. We flinch until we become sensitized, then we flinch no more.
8.‘Gay Marriage’ unleashes a global legal nightmare.
‘Gay marriage’ will clog the courts with myriad issues. Already, married gay couples are demanding marriage rights wherever they settle, regardless of the current laws of that state or nation. Not to mention the hundreds of cases in the USA alone concerning a host of bewildering issues, like gay divorce and ownership of artificially inseminated offspring.

Everything in your post past#4‘Gay Marriage’ is founded on a false understanding of homosexuality is interesting but unnecessary in debunking the scam.

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Contract with who ever you choose but don't charge me with your co-copulator's bills.

[ForkAnSpoon]

What a suprise, a gay wedding at West Point, ore will be coming soon.

[ToGood]

Yep it's a done deal, good for all around to see and hear.

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Wait a minute......I have been, repeatedly, told, by YOUR side, that reproduction isn't a vital component for marriage. What difference can children with birth defects play here ? And since when does cultist methodology play any part in polygamy, but not gay marriage ? And what studies do you have access to, pertaining to siblings wishing to marry ? It seems to me that you are engaging in double standards, to support your side, and undermine mine. Play fair. Accept that the same arguments that you use for SSM can, and MUST, be used to support polygamy and incestuous relationships. Or else, cop to selective elitism, as I have stated previously.

Notice when you mention incest marriage all of a sudden reproduction becomes an important part of marriage!

Priceless!

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
But.........the Swami agrees with rest of it ? Is that..hmmmmm....correct ?

A scam is a scam is a scam. We don't need to answer every false arguement they throw out. But from a "liberal" point of view a person under certain circumstances could have a dependt co-copulate or not who has been supported by said person declared able to receive benefits.

They could not have found a worse timeing to present the bill for their scam.

I wonder what Log Camin Republicans thinks about the scam?

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:

<quoted text>A scam is a scam is a scam. We don't need to answer every false arguement they throw out. But from a "liberal" point of view a person under certain circumstances could have a dependt co-copulate or not who has been supported by said person declared able to receive benefits.
They could not have found a worse timeing to present the bill for their scam.
I wonder what Log Camin Republicans thinks about the scam?

no one cares about your ignorance... stupid!!!!!!!!!!

[Winston Smiths dog]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Polygamy BAD! Yada yada yada. Nonsensical bigotry is often used against same sex marriage too.
Of course we're talking about consenting adults, just like same sex marriage. Emphasize CONSENTING. Emphasize ADULTS. Get it? Got it? Good!

Yes, I know we're talking about consenting adults. What has happened, historically speaking, didn't involve them, hence the difficulty posed for polygamists. Where in my post did I say I was against it?

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That is incorrect, fascist. No opinion, save yours, is unwelcome, in here.
Obviously, yours is not welcome, but I'm sure you understand the rules. By the way, have you yet discovered that a high school diploma is required for college attendance ? LOL, guess you can't go, now, can you ? Your misspelling could kill someone, and I wouldn't trust you to take care of a frog.

i got my GED in Bayviews womens correctional facility when I was 20 ... ohhhh what a shame

[TheTroll Stopper]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That is incorrect, fascist yap yap yap blah blah blah.

A person who opposes expanding marriage rights as you do is no position whatsoever to call anyone else a "fascist", bigot boy.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That is incorrect, fascist. No opinion, save yours, is unwelcome, in here.
Obviously, yours is not welcome, but I'm sure you understand the rules. By the way, have you yet discovered that a high school diploma is required for college attendance ? LOL, guess you can't go, now, can you ? Your misspelling could kill someone, and I wouldn't trust you to take care of a frog.

hows that hand....loooooser

[Winston Smiths dog]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
But you have not included homosexual behavior, in your litany of damage done, through wrongful behavior.

Ya mean the mental and physical abuse gays have suffered at the hands of narrow minded buffoons?

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
So....claiming to have never gotten past the 8th grade was.........a lie ?
And I cannot believe that you passed the test with spelling like that, it poses a danger to all who will be cared for, by you. Spelling is important in the Medical field. You have much work to do on that front. I suggest more computer time on spelling tuition, and less computer time spent telling others that THEY are ignorant, as you are.

sorry never did go to a single day of high school... so no lie.... ged i studyied for myself in my cell

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

amazing what you can accomplish in a year and five months in a cell

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
As I suspected, you have no answer to the statement that you present a danger to others, through your ignorance. To hell with their safety, as long as you win, right ?

honey the only danger to saftey is you dumbazzes

[KiMare]

You can claim they are equal, but they are not the same. Never will be.

Makes it impossible to be equal. No law can change that.

Not trying to be difficult, just simple reality.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Both money-earning hands are fine, how's the Jerry-robbing job going ?

we picked out a beautiful ring together ha ha ha lonely azz loser

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Homosexuality in nature?

Even if you consider heifers who were engineered and breed for man’s use out in the pasture dry humping to be natural beasts? I have never in all my time looking after and taking them to market seen what looked like copulation. Now on large spreads where the cattle are wilder and more able to survive on their own there is a lot less of the dry humping. Leg pumping lap dogs don]t qualify as natural either.

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Dry humping heifers are the most domesticated and good for leading the others to slaughter.