Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169789 Dec 3, 2012
I predict Dan will be suddenly announcing he's leaving us losers to get back to his exciting and classy social life! Perhaps the cocktail hour approaches. Black ties!

Dan. What a jackass!

YUK!YUK!YUK!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169793 Dec 3, 2012
rolls wrote:
who farted?
Dan.
FrackedManagers

Covina, CA

#169797 Dec 3, 2012
Look again Chris Jeffers, ther will be an opening in the city of Alhambra, Ca. since there's will be going off to Santa Clara, Ca. to be their city manager.

So Chris Jeffers of Glendora, Ca. you've done plenty of damage to the city and employees mora already, pleasse get lost.

The Santa Clara City Council will vote Tuesday on an employee contract to appoint Alhambra City Manager Julio Fuentes.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169798 Dec 3, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
What you're attempting is a play on words.
There is no aspect of gays wanting "more" in terms of equal rights. In fact the term sums it up - equal rights.
As far as the rest of your thoughts here again is why you are incorrect;
Gays pursuing equal rights in terms of marriage have never made efforts towards excluding others. They are only focused on their path towards equality when it comes to marriage mainly because of the concentrated effort it will take to make it a national reality.
Disagree??
Then find just ONE case where gays took efforts to excluding say polygamists from marrying. Just one....because if you cannot you are what I already know of you - you're a liar.
Again, you are trying to act cute with your "gays don't make efforts to exclude" nonsense. The fact that you guys toss them to the side like bad fruit says it all. Any other form of marriage aside from same sex marriage is insignificant, a red herring, and off topic to you guys.

If you really want people to buy into your "equal right's" BS you really should stop attempting to exclude others through omission.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169799 Dec 3, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
The poster merely pointed to the fact polygamy involved itself with a completely different set of circumstances in terms of marriage than the gay marriage issue in that polygamists are concerned with marriages involving themselves with 3 or more adults in a union.
And apparently that confused you.
Funny, pointing out all the differences in forms of marriage are relevant to the argument against them, that is unless you are talking to the differences with homosexual marriages.

Careful, your inner-bigot is showing.
Willows

Covina, CA

#169800 Dec 3, 2012
Whats A Matter U - what century do you live in?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#169801 Dec 3, 2012
crazy
ScreCorps

Covina, CA

#169802 Dec 3, 2012
A.L.E.C. is finally exposed for it's communist cell activity in the USA.

http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed

With the likes of Org's like ALEX and Cross Roads the USA almost was pulled under and out of control of it's honest voting citizens of America.
Anonymous

Los Angeles, CA

#169803 Dec 4, 2012
anyone awake
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169804 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Allow me to educate...."friend". ..
http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php...
http://www.npr.org/blogs/pictureshow/2012/02/...
http://dalje.com/en-world/brother-and-sister-...
It's very clear to me, "friend" , that you only see what you want to see. You're a loudmouthed bullshitter. Punk yourself.
ROFL!!!!

Your first "story" is based on hearsay. Add to that it comes from an obviously extreme religious group in a blog of all places. No proof or mention of it anywhere else and you're willing to claim it's factual....LOL!!!!

--You might as well give me a blog which was written by the KKK in which one member claims to have seen a secret government report which outlined blacks were the result of women being raped by chimpanzees - in other words it's bullshit.

Your second article is about a MONK marrying a NUN which is outlined on how a 'brother' married a 'sister'. They are not related in other words moron....the term 'brother' and 'sister' in the religious context of monastaries and such are used to describe priests and nuns you IDIOT.

--You might as well lay claim someone watching NASCAR in the stands claimed cars actually were airplanes because he said "Man....that car really flew by".

LOL!!!!

And your third mention is of an actual brother and sister adopted by different families as infants who met later in life, fell in love, married and had children who only then found out they were related. A once in billion chance and event which I already mentioned in this thread. Hardly proof this happens more often than that.

--Might as well claim people who own 2 headed snakes, drive purple Ford make cars and live in Missouri commonly win Powerball lotteries whose earnings top 400 million or over because one man one.

Your "argument" and your "proof" is pathetic and still shows no harm in gay marriage.

Next.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169805 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
While I am enjoying ripping you to shreds, I have work to do in the morning, and I could stay up half the night chewing you up and spitting you out. You can shut up, because I have already shown you to be biased and living in denial. Go call someone else "friend", and "punk", and "moron", someone who has not slam dunked you already, I have done enough work on you.
Really.

Because everything you've managed to throw at me couldn't cause so much as a tickle.

LOL!!!!

Good gawd loser. One thing your sad ass never took into account is that I too was against gay marriage until I examined it from every angle because like you I at one time wanted to fervently prove it was harmful. What happened was that I could find no viable harm in it. And in doing so determined we should not ban a segment of society a freedom such as marriage based solely on bias.

Myself I think your head is buried up your ass so deep the last time you saw sunlight was June 3rd, 1972 but there ya go dumbass.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169806 Dec 4, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you are trying to act cute with your "gays don't make efforts to exclude" nonsense. The fact that you guys toss them to the side like bad fruit says it all. Any other form of marriage aside from same sex marriage is insignificant, a red herring, and off topic to you guys.
If you really want people to buy into your "equal right's" BS you really should stop attempting to exclude others through omission.
Whose "you guys" first off.

LOL!!

You may find yourself waking up to voices in your head Sybil but not me.

And no one is tossing polygamists away like "bad fruit". Fact is no one gives a rats ass about polygamists when discussing gay marriage but you and your ilk since it's the only desparate way you can find at derailing arguments in favor of gays marrying.

You've been had friend. Give it a rest.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169807 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!!
Your first "story" is based on hearsay. Add to that it comes from an obviously extreme religious group in a blog of all places. No proof or mention of it anywhere else and you're willing to claim it's factual....LOL!!!!
--You might as well give me a blog which was written by the KKK in which one member claims to have seen a secret government report which outlined blacks were the result of women being raped by chimpanzees - in other words it's bullshit.
Your second article is about a MONK marrying a NUN which is outlined on how a 'brother' married a 'sister'. They are not related in other words moron....the term 'brother' and 'sister' in the religious context of monastaries and such are used to describe priests and nuns you IDIOT.
--You might as well lay claim someone watching NASCAR in the stands claimed cars actually were airplanes because he said "Man....that car really flew by".
LOL!!!!
And your third mention is of an actual brother and sister adopted by different families as infants who met later in life, fell in love, married and had children who only then found out they were related. A once in billion chance and event which I already mentioned in this thread. Hardly proof this happens more often than that.
--Might as well claim people who own 2 headed snakes, drive purple Ford make cars and live in Missouri commonly win Powerball lotteries whose earnings top 400 million or over because one man one.
Your "argument" and your "proof" is pathetic and still shows no harm in gay marriage.
Next.
You believe that if a type of marriage is rare is should be illegal? Please explain the logic behind that dummy.

What a dope!
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169808 Dec 4, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, pointing out all the differences in forms of marriage are relevant to the argument against them, that is unless you are talking to the differences with homosexual marriages.
Careful, your inner-bigot is showing.
You can point them out. And you can see their relevance illustrated.

Your problem is you cannot successfully argue the facts brought to your doorstep.

No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant. Add to that the only things people are concerned about if you can actually find polygamists is that they not coerce, marry underage kiddies or use methods of brainwashing in their practice of polygamy....no different than any other marriage moron.

Your inner bigot came out a long time ago with your sad effort at staining gay marriage so I'd shaddup hypocrit.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169809 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
Because everything you've managed to throw at me couldn't cause so much as a tickle.
LOL!!!!
Good gawd loser. One thing your sad ass never took into account is that I too was against gay marriage until I examined it from every angle because like you I at one time wanted to fervently prove it was harmful. What happened was that I could find no viable harm in it. And in doing so determined we should not ban a segment of society a freedom such as marriage based solely on bias.
Myself I think your head is buried up your ass so deep the last time you saw sunlight was June 3rd, 1972 but there ya go dumbass.
Now all you have to do is extend your tolerance to others besides same sex couples who wish to marry but are also banned from doing so.

You know, Mormon Moe and Muslim Mikey and the like. Even if you are bigoted against them. Suck it up Dan! they deserve equality too.

What a jackass!
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169810 Dec 4, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You believe that if a type of marriage is rare is should be illegal? Please explain the logic behind that dummy.
What a dope!
Never did.

Unfortunately your sad ass only serves to play the smartass troll in here so ignoring you like the lonely fool yuo apparently are isn't going to be too tough....have a good day.

LOL!!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169811 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Whose "you guys" first off.
LOL!!
You may find yourself waking up to voices in your head Sybil but not me.
And no one is tossing polygamists away like "bad fruit". Fact is no one gives a rats ass about polygamists when discussing gay marriage but you and your ilk since it's the only desparate way you can find at derailing arguments in favor of gays marrying.
You've been had friend. Give it a rest.
You believe polygamists don't deserve equal rights because you're paranoid that they want them only as a trick to deny gays from marrying?

You're a dope, friend!
TheTroll Stopper

Roanoke, VA

#169812 Dec 4, 2012
ScreCorps wrote:
off-topic nonsense
Excuse me, but the title of this thread is "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage".

When you have something to say that pertains to the actual topic of this thread, please let us know. Until then, feel free to STFU, troll.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169813 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You can point them out. And you can see their relevance illustrated.
Your problem is you cannot successfully argue the facts brought to your doorstep.
No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant. Add to that the only things people are concerned about if you can actually find polygamists is that they not coerce, marry underage kiddies or use methods of brainwashing in their practice of polygamy....no different than any other marriage moron.
Your inner bigot came out a long time ago with your sad effort at staining gay marriage so I'd shaddup hypocrit.
You should be concerned about straight and gay people "that they not coerce, marry underage kiddies or use methods of brainwashing in their practice of marriage" too.

Why are you only concerned when polygamists do it? Are you a big dopey bigot or something?

FUN!
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169814 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, and if the people wish to marry polygamously, are they not free to choose this, as "our government is formatted by the people for the purpose of allowing us as U.S. citizens to govern ourselves as free peoples." ?
And, until now, the government determined homosexuality a problematic and harmful institution. And let's not forget that harmful elements, such as cultist aspects, which led to underage marriages, can also be found in the gay community. Forgetting that polygamy is not restricted to cultists might be convenient for the gays, so as to separate themselves on the issue of freedom to choose, but the issue is freedom to choose, a right that is being denied to the Mormons, the Jews and a host of other religious groups, based upon the narrow minded view that any polygamist must be a cultist, the same argument that has been used against the gays, up until now. I see a double standard being applied with impunity by you and your kind, selective elitism. How does it feel to be a bigot, and a hater ?
WOW!!!

I must have gotten you ALL whizzed up...LOL!!! You've got upwards of seven (7) posts in response to mine from when I left yesterday.

I answered your idiotic comment above already. Let polygamists marry as long as they don't marry underage kiddies, coercion or brainwashing in doing so. Big wahoo.

In case you missed to subject at hand it's gay marriage and not if Ferrari red is the best color for a sportscar, if prehistoric man was the first to invent the wheel or about polygamy shitforbrains.

As far as being a bigot, you my fine sir, are using any desparate measure you can fabricate in an effort to take down the idea of gayts marrying so you might want to stop puking on yourself Chief.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Tue Mike 132
stores with bad customer service {list your wor... Dec 18 Tracy 3
mexican landscapers dump in the desert Dec 11 Jean 22
Re-Thinking Southern California Earthquake Scen... Dec 8 Rick 1
Lower gas prices means more people on the road ... Dec 7 Ronald 6
Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Dec 6 Bobbo Yogi 154
Review: Inter-City Plumbing (Jun '09) Dec 3 Jean 11
Palm Springs Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:17 pm PST