Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You don’t need to lie, You cant point to a single post where I ever said he was not impeached, he was, and after being impeached by the house, that impeachment failed in the senate.
I haven’t changed what I have been saying once.
lying will get you no where
I wiped the floor with you then and still am now dummy, because what I am saying is history, a fact, not an opinion.
you can read the constitution, or remain ignorant.
Personally I prefer you ignorant as it just makes it all more fun.:)
what I find particularly funny is how you seem to have an emotional stake in this.

All of your accusations of "lies", funny bluster and silly tough guy talk makes for lots of fun, but of course you are wrong. Clinton's impeachment didn't "fail in the Senate".

What a dope!

Funny Stuff!

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
All of your accusations of "lies", funny bluster and silly tough guy talk makes for lots of fun, but of course you are wrong. Clinton's impeachment didn't "fail in the Senate".
What a dope!
Funny Stuff!

We know it did, we have the date and the vote on the impeachment trial

it failed :)

You may be changing your position, but I have not changed mine

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
We know it did, we have the date and the vote on the impeachment trial
it failed :)
You may be changing your position, but I have not changed mine

The impeachment did not fail, the senate failed to convict. Maybe that's where your confusion lies. But who cares why you're a dope, it's funny that you are!

Nana nana nana!

FUN!

[Winston Smith]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You deserve them. That's why no one responds to you Winnie! Except your good buddy Mike DiRucci.
Who loves ya baby?

Uhh, Mike, it was AKPilot's post that got all the lemons & such. My point was that they weren't called for. But I knows ya loves me though. It shines through quite nicely in all your posts.

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Danth's Law.

While big d is getting his talking points ready for reply to my #169230 post, Who is getting impeached?

[Winston Smith]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
The impeachment did not fail, the senate failed to convict. Maybe that's where your confusion lies. But who cares why you're a dope, it's funny that you are!
Nana nana nana!
FUN!

This discussion is STILL going on! Hilarious! Keep up the good work.

It's like this, Clinton was impeached. That isn't failure. If it failed, he wouldn't have been impeached and the Senate wouldn't have had the opportunity to let him off the hook.

[Mike DiRucci]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Uhh, Mike, it was AKPilot's post that got all the lemons & such. My point was that they weren't called for. But I knows ya loves me though. It shines through quite nicely in all your posts.

;)

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

I guess we are concerned with the Clinton trial? Is Obama next?

I wait for return to original sub.

[Mike DiRucci]

jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:

<quoted text>While big d is getting his talking points ready for reply to my #169230 post, Who is getting impeached?

Bill Clinton was impeached. But Big D says the impeachment "failed". He just can't accept it, the old liberal fool!

He's a big dope.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
The impeachment did not fail, the senate failed to convict. Maybe that's where your confusion lies. But who cares why you're a dope, it's funny that you are!
Nana nana nana!
FUN!

Are you finally starting to learn... and when a case is brought to trial, it fails or succeeds there.

If we can get you the equivalent of a Jr High school education here it is remotely possible that you can learn yet.

And impeachment is like an charge, it is a charge, only less so because it is by vote alone, and that impeachment ( or charge ) is brought to trail, where it either succeeds or fails.( again less so as there also it is by vote alone )

we all know this was nothing but political from the get go, but you seem very emotionally tied to it. It really isn’t all that complicated ya know.

And impeachment was brought to the senate who has the power to try impeachments, and it failed there, it didn’t get the required 2/3 votes needed to succeed.

and not a single penalty spelled out in the articles of impeachment were carried out, it died there, as was known it would before all the time millions and millions of dollars were spent on it.

It died, a total failure, the removal from office ( which was spelled out in the articles of impeachment ) didn’t happen. A total failure.

Now you and I may have a different definition of the word failure. But when that putty died in the senate, and not a single thing came of it because of its failure there… that pretty much ended the entire affair

[Mike DiRucci]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
This discussion is STILL going on! Hilarious! Keep up the good work.
It's like this, Clinton was impeached. That isn't failure. If it failed, he wouldn't have been impeached and the Senate wouldn't have had the opportunity to let him off the hook.

Thank you. Having lots of fun with the old jackass again today. I got him wound up tighter than an eight day clock!

Fun!

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you finally starting to learn... and when a case is brought to trial, it fails or succeeds there.
If we can get you the equivalent of a Jr High school education here it is remotely possible that you can learn yet.
And impeachment is like an charge, it is a charge, only less so because it is by vote alone, and that impeachment ( or charge ) is brought to trail, where it either succeeds or fails.( again less so as there also it is by vote alone )
we all know this was nothing but political from the get go, but you seem very emotionally tied to it. It really isn’t all that complicated ya know.
And impeachment was brought to the senate who has the power to try impeachments, and it failed there, it didn’t get the required 2/3 votes needed to succeed.
and not a single penalty spelled out in the articles of impeachment were carried out, it died there, as was known it would before all the time millions and millions of dollars were spent on it.
It died, a total failure, the removal from office ( which was spelled out in the articles of impeachment ) didn’t happen. A total failure.
Now you and I may have a different definition of the word failure. But when that putty died in the senate, and not a single thing came of it because of its failure there… that pretty much ended the entire affair

Yes, and he was still impeached. The impeachment did not fail.

Tell us again and try to use less than 1000 words, who of us is "emotionally tied" to this.

Big Fun!

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, and he was still impeached. The impeachment did not fail.
Tell us again and try to use less than 1000 words, who of us is "emotionally tied" to this.
Big Fun!

I suppose it was too much to hope for that you could learn

Yes he was impeached by the house

that impeachment failed at trial in the senate :)

It died there, and no penalty from the impeachment were applied, a total waste of time money and effort.

Effect... zero ( other than to give you a hard on ) LOL

[Exhoss]

There has never been a complaint.

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Great news for Fellow tax payers; the gay conspiracy refuses to confront the fact that sham gay marriages are only a way to dig into our pockets. Honesty and critical thought forever.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:

Great news for Fellow tax payers; the gay conspiracy refuses to confront the fact that sham gay marriages are only a way to dig into our pockets. Honesty and critical thought forever.

got stupid..... this morazz sure does.... gett back to flucking your sisterwife moron

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

I heard a few years ago one gay supporter laughing along with her 6 year old at a cartoon gag where a boy tackles his dog with a "flying butt pliers" surprise surprise surprise! the boy is now an adult homosexual. He rejected his manhood early dew to his mother's encouragement.

Fellow rational thinkers we must counter the gay recruitment everywhere.

i respect the mother and son greatly but to bad they fell for the gay recruitment.

Rational tolerance forever

[jack rabbit swammi cowboy]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>got stupid..... this morazz sure does.... gett back to flucking your sisterwife moron

We can asume this gay supporter has no rebuttal to any of my arguements. Sorry I don't have a sister with a wife. but I know morons will keep working on all senseable women.

Homosexuals pay for your own health insurance.

There are other contracts you can make with whoever that dose not cost me a dime. If you trust a gay partner more than your family go to court for rights to visit when you are in a coma or whatever.
means nothing to me.

Get your lazy but able hands out of my pocket!!!

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

jack rabbit swammi cowboy wrote:

<quoted text>We can asume this gay supporter has no rebuttal to any of my arguements. Sorry I don't have a sister with a wife. but I know morons will keep working on all senseable women.
Homosexuals pay for your own health insurance.
There are other contracts you can make with whoever that dose not cost me a dime. If you trust a gay partner more than your family go to court for rights to visit when you are in a coma or whatever.
means nothing to me.
Get your lazy but able hands out of my pocket!!!

oh sorry i'm not gay stupid fluck!!! Just a hooker and stripper in seattle... but still way smarter then your dumbazz

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>got stupid..... this morazz sure does.... gett back to flucking your sisterwife moron

Spoken like a person of tolerance and diversity! We feel the love.