Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201846 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169444 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I already know, I dont care if you do or not
You know but you're keeping it secret?

Aw c'mon Biggy, don't be like that. I told you, now you tell me what you think it means.

Fun!
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#169445 Nov 30, 2012
DorN wrote:
<quoted text>
=---------
If homosexuals are allowed to legally marry and be accepted in society, they will "come out of the closet" and not have to marry straights in order to be respected.
I can respect a homosexual more if they just did't demand to be respected by changing rules and laws to be part of a normal society. Some will say they don't care if they are respected and that this is not about respect, but it is

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169446 Nov 30, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm refering to a SSM you moron, not just a marriage. The few "VALID" arguments as you describe, are just that valid, just because YOU don't agree with them makes you very biased.
Yeah I am biased. And so are you, that's why we are here jackass!

All arguments I've heard against same sex marriage are weak at best. The slippery slope I'd say is the strongest. If we allow marriage to mean everything, it will mean nothing. But in practise it will hardly be a problem due to the small percentages of people involved.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169447 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You know but you're keeping it secret?
Aw c'mon Biggy, don't be like that. I told you, now you tell me what you think it means.
Fun!
You wont ever know, you can rest easy that is was a total success in your mind :)

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169448 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You wont ever know, you can rest easy that is was a total success in your mind :)
Yes it was. If Clinton's impeachment wasn't successful, we wouldn't be arguing about Clinton's impeachment!

What a dope!

You think impeachment means found guilty and removed from office by the Senate. You're wrong. The House has the sole power of impeachment. Once they impeach, you're "successfully" impeached regardless of the outcome in the Senate.

It bears repeating- What a dope!

FUN!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169449 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it was. If Clinton's impeachment wasn't successful, we wouldn't be arguing about Clinton's impeachment!
What a dope!
You think impeachment means found guilty and removed from office by the Senate. You're wrong. The House has the sole power of impeachment. Once they impeach, you're "successfully" impeached regardless of the outcome in the Senate.
It bears repeating- What a dope!
FUN!
Now you are a mind reader? Do you have an actual ability in mind reading or do you have a "successful" effort in mind reading regardless of the fact that you donít actually the ability?

You have no idea what I think, you certainly have no idea of what I know ( you already demonstrated that you donít know that )

LOL

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169450 Nov 30, 2012
Arguing with this jackass "Big D" reminds me of playing whack a mole. He just keeps popping up insisting Clinton wasn't impeached and I gotta whack him back down again!

Whack a Dope!

It's fun!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169451 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are a mind reader? Do you have an actual ability in mind reading or do you have a "successful" effort in mind reading regardless of the fact that you donít actually the ability?
You have no idea what I think, you certainly have no idea of what I know ( you already demonstrated that you donít know that )
LOL
Well you're keeping it a secret, so we can only guess what you think impeachment means from your arguments. And I guess that what you think it means is wrong.

You could tell us what you think it means but you won't because you know that what you think it means is wrong!

Big Fun!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169453 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
Arguing with this jackass "Big D" reminds me of playing whack a mole. He just keeps popping up insisting Clinton wasn't impeached and I gotta whack him back down again!
Whack a Dope!
It's fun!
You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house

I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.

Try again...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169454 Nov 30, 2012
Whack-a-Dope!

Too Funny!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169455 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
Whack-a-Dope!
Too Funny!
I knew you couldnít, so lying wonít help you.

Nothing will help you actually but it is fun to watch you so desperately try.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169456 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house
I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.
Try again...
Yeah you got the first part right. Clinton was impeached by the House. But then you get real silly and say the impeachment "failed".

So your position seems to be "Clinton was successfully impeached and it failed."

Very silly!

But FUN for me!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169457 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house
I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.
Try again...
OK.

Whack!

Fun!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169458 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you couldnít, so lying wonít help you.
Nothing will help you actually but it is fun to watch you so desperately try.
You knew I couldn't what? You're losing what little coherency your posts have.

Not nice to falsely accuse people of lying. Especially when you can't even tell us what the lie was.

It's desperation. You really need to just relax, admit you were wrong and move on.

Have fun! I am.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169459 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You knew I couldn't what? You're losing what little coherency your posts have.
Not nice to falsely accuse people of lying. Especially when you can't even tell us what the lie was.
It's desperation. You really need to just relax, admit you were wrong and move on.
Have fun! I am.
You could not find a single post where I ever said Clinton was not impeached, you tell people that is what I say ( a total lie ) and then you canít back it up.

I do read and relax, when I am not laughing that is, I figure when you lie like that you must really be desperate, and that is hilarious to me.
:)
Altoos

Azusa, CA

#169460 Nov 30, 2012
Being that they are so stupid is the reason they post on a out of town topic.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169461 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You could not find a single post where I ever said Clinton was not impeached, you tell people that is what I say ( a total lie ) and then you canít back it up.
I do read and relax, when I am not laughing that is, I figure when you lie like that you must really be desperate, and that is hilarious to me.
:)
You say both Clinton was impeached and the impeachment "failed". That's silly! If you believe the impeachment failed, why am I lying when I say that's what you believe? If it failed, then he wasn't impeached.

Help us out here. Was Clinton impeached or not? Saying he was impeached and the impeachment failed is saying he wasn't impeached, dummy! Maybe you're saying he was un-impeached?

What a dope!

SO Funny!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169462 Nov 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You say both Clinton was impeached and the impeachment "failed". That's silly! If you believe the impeachment failed, why am I lying when I say that's what you believe? If it failed, then he wasn't impeached.
Help us out here. Was Clinton impeached or not? Saying he was impeached and the impeachment failed is saying he wasn't impeached, dummy! Maybe you're saying he was un-impeached?
What a dope!
SO Funny!
I donít think a darn thing can help you.
Altoos

Azusa, CA

#169463 Nov 30, 2012
This still hasn't been vetted.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169464 Nov 30, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít think a darn thing can help you.
Aw biggie, don't be like that. Help me out. Explain it better. Clinton was impeached but he wasn't?

What a dope!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Palm Springs Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Costco readies for new opening (Dec '06) Jul 26 Maria Anderson 157
Desert Hot Springs Police Dept. Great Public Se... Jul 17 Dorris 7
News Man petitions road name change to mend racial t... Jul 11 inewsmaster 1
Review: jumpers zone party rentals Jul 9 Yaneth 1
News SC Labs wins contract to test pot for Palm Springs Jul 9 LOLbumps 1
Plus Size clothes - Draper's & Damon's Jun '15 Tracy 2
Complaint CATHEDRAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Jan '08) Jun '15 Mr Jon Doe 49
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Palm Springs Mortgages