Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,367)

Showing posts 147,321 - 147,340 of200,244
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167888
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Just as the impeachment was voted for in the house along partisan lines, we all know it was just a partisan show in every respect and a waste of taxpayersí money.

If it has succeeded Clinton would have been removed from office, but it failed in the senate on Feb 12 1999 so he was not removed from office.

nothing but a time and money wasting political show.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167889
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
Just as the impeachment was voted for in the house along partisan lines, we all know it was just a partisan show in every respect and a waste of taxpayersí money.
If it has succeeded Clinton would have been removed from office, but it failed in the senate on Feb 12 1999 so he was not removed from office.
nothing but a time and money wasting political show.
It succeeded. If it failed, it wouldn't have gone to the Senate. Did it go to the Senate Big D? Yes, it went to the Senate Mike. So it didn't fail! Big D!

What a dope!

“ WOOF !”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167890
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
Just as the impeachment was voted for in the house along partisan lines, we all know it was just a partisan show in every respect and a waste of taxpayersí money.
If it has succeeded Clinton would have been removed from office, but it failed in the senate on Feb 12 1999 so he was not removed from office.
nothing but a time and money wasting political show.
Fine. whateva u say. How about just for you, we do it ALL OVER AGAIN, just to please you, on The Obamanaic, and THIS TIME, we'll make SURE it succeeds !

OK ?

:)
Winston Smith

Herndon, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167891
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Fine. whateva u say. How about just for you, we do it ALL OVER AGAIN, just to please you, on The Obamanaic, and THIS TIME, we'll make SURE it succeeds !
OK ?
:)
Yes, we need the House to impeach Obama and the Senate to acquit, again. Yep, we need to waste money and time on crap like this. Have you finished your underground bunker yet? Best git crackin' before the commies take over. Don't forget to stock up on tinfoil too.
sociopathic Liberals

Orland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167892
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

TIME TO DIE:
U.N. ADS PROMOTE KILLING OFF THE ELDERLY.

Hey all you wrinkly, middle-aged has-beens: Are you ready to move over and let the next generation have your spot on the planet? After all, youíve lived a good life. And your aging body is going to cost taxpayers a lot more than the salt you think you are worth. In other words, your return-on-investment isnít looking so good to the United Nations.

In case you havenít heard, our brains are being conditioned to look upon you as the burden you are. And itís time you see yourself that way too:

Thatís right. The UN is promoting we EUTHANIZE our aging parents. If that ad didnít send chills up your spine, the next one will. These commercials are pointing us to Agenda 21, a global strategy to reduce the population in the years ahead. Yes, it sounds like something out of a zombie movie, but itís been going on now for several years as weíve been reporting.

Disguised as environmental stewardship, Agenda 21 is nothing more than repackaged Socialism, and many heavy-hitters with billions of dollars and a worldwide influence are behind it.
http://standupforthetruth.com/2012/11/time-to ...
The fart

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167893
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

i did
Spinxed

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167894
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Grover Norquist muslim Extremist friends and lovers have call for destruction of Egyptian antiquities.

Whats Grover doing by living in the United States of America, he should be over there with his wife's family members tearing up the Middle East.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167895
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
It succeeded. If it failed, it wouldn't have gone to the Senate. Did it go to the Senate Big D? Yes, it went to the Senate Mike. So it didn't fail! Big D!
What a dope!
and failed in the sennate feb 12 1999, unfortnuatly, I wish it had not failed, but it did.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167896
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, we need the House to impeach Obama and the Senate to acquit, again. Yep, we need to waste money and time on crap like this. Have you finished your underground bunker yet? Best git crackin' before the commies take over. Don't forget to stock up on tinfoil too.
It's not very expensive. We pay congress anyway, may as well get some useful work out of them!

The 2012 campaigns cost $4 billion dollars. That's expensive!
DumpDonald

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167897
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Dump Donald Trump:

http://signon.org/sign/urge-macys-to-dump-don...
Winston Smith

Herndon, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167898
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not very expensive. We pay congress anyway, may as well get some useful work out of them!
The 2012 campaigns cost $4 billion dollars. That's expensive!
Not very expensive you say? You wanna hand over the same amount, in cash, to me? It won't be very useful, you know it would be partisan. Not enough "partisan" in the Senate to convict. Why bother? It won't be useful at all.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167899
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct, and that indictment failed at trial in the Senate on Feb 12 1999
we can use whatever words you like, outcome is the same
What? The indictment failed? Oh come on. He was acquitted of the charges in the indictment at trial, but the indictment did not fail.... the HOUSE PASSED IT!!!!!!!!!! JESUS!
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167900
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and failed in the sennate feb 12 1999, unfortnuatly, I wish it had not failed, but it did.
The Senate DOES NOT vote on impeachment.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167901
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>What? The indictment failed? Oh come on. He was acquitted of the charges in the indictment at trial, but the indictment did not fail.... the HOUSE PASSED IT!!!!!!!!!! JESUS!
Yes, you can have an indictment with no evidence whatsoever, just takes a popular vote in the case of an impeachment.

And Indictment has to go through the courts to succeed, and in an impeachments case, it has to be tried in the senate, where it failed on Feb 12 1999

A shame really, I suspect we would have been spared 8 years of one of the worst presidents in American history had it succeeded.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167902
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Not very expensive you say? You wanna hand over the same amount, in cash, to me? It won't be very useful, you know it would be partisan. Not enough "partisan" in the Senate to convict. Why bother? It won't be useful at all.
There are good reasons to go through the expense of an impeachment if it ever becomes necessary.

It can be very useful and necessary. That's why we have it. We can just cut off foreign aid to one of the smaller countries that hates us for a day or two, that will more than cover the expense.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167903
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>The Senate DOES NOT vote on impeachment.
No a Senate tries an impeachment that is voted on in the house, and in the case of Clinton the impeachment failed Feb 12 1999 in the senate.

Again, I never said once that he was not impeached, I said the impeachment failed, which it did.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167904
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you can have an indictment with no evidence whatsoever, just takes a popular vote in the case of an impeachment.
And Indictment has to go through the courts to succeed, and in an impeachments case, it has to be tried in the senate, where it failed on Feb 12 1999
A shame really, I suspect we would have been spared 8 years of one of the worst presidents in American history had it succeeded.
How would Clinton's impeachment have spared us Obama?
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167905
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Not very expensive you say? You wanna hand over the same amount, in cash, to me? It won't be very useful, you know it would be partisan. Not enough "partisan" in the Senate to convict. Why bother? It won't be useful at all.
That is why impeachment doesnít happen all the time, usually a House is a tad more mature than that to waste our time and money that way on something that has no chance of succeeding.

It was a total waste of time and money.

Granted we would likely be a lot better off today had the impeachment succeeded.

But hindsight is 20-20

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167906
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No a Senate tries an impeachment that is voted on in the house, and in the case of Clinton the impeachment failed Feb 12 1999 in the senate.
Again, I never said once that he was not impeached, I said the impeachment failed, which it did.
No it didn't. nana nana nana!
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167907
Nov 13, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you can have an indictment with no evidence whatsoever, just takes a popular vote in the case of an impeachment.
And Indictment has to go through the courts to succeed, and in an impeachments case, it has to be tried in the senate, where it failed on Feb 12 1999
A shame really, I suspect we would have been spared 8 years of one of the worst presidents in American history had it succeeded.
Like I said, the Senate DOES NOT vote on impeachment.

Where did you get the idea that "an indictment has to go through the courts to succeed?" A grand jury votes to indict. Period. The defendant is indicted. Whether it goes to trial or what happens at trial has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INDICTMENT.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 147,321 - 147,340 of200,244
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Palm Springs Discussions

Search the Palm Springs Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 14 hr PMS will get yeah 7,821
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 19 hr all doned in 4,864
Tony Casas, 77; Former Prisons Official Worked ... (Sep '07) Sat Big Juciey Pussie 630
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Sat The right is wrong 2,225
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Jul 11 This topics peaked 15,911
Touch Of Class Consignments, Cathedral City, ca. (Aug '13) Jul 6 Sandy 118
US: Afghan vote step forward on 'democratic path' Jul 4 Rho 9
•••
•••
•••
Palm Springs Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Palm Springs Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Palm Springs People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Palm Springs News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Palm Springs
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••