obama says leave Susan Rice alone!!

[charley brown]

obama says to leave susan rice alone and come after him about benghaze. McClean smiles and says UUUUUHHHHH, o.k. snicker, snicker.

[CUMAGAIN]

MAYBE HE IS DICKING HER TO

[monkee]

CUMAGAIN wrote:

MAYBE HE IS DICKING HER TO

Damn if he is he sure is a lucky man . She is way too hot looking.

[charley brown]

get ready to see a lot more nasty stuff before these hearings are finished. obama says susan rice had no knowledge of the lybian attack, then why was she on five news programs saying that it was a flash mob situation over a movie about the muslim religion?

[charley brown]

charley brown wrote:

obama says to leave susan rice alone and come after him about benghaze. McClean smiles and says UUUUUHHHHH, o.k. snicker, snicker.

sorry i meant to post McCain not McClean .

[Slapper John]

You all mark my words. Years from now the true architect of all this Benghazi business will be known. None other than Bill Clinton is behind all this activity. The Petreous scandal, the video protest bullcrap, all of it.

No one else in DC would design this and no one else would have the nerve to serve it up and judging by the way most Americans are sopping it up with a biscuit, he's still got the touch.

I just hope Petreous gets better treatment than Vince Foster. He's got to be one nervous guy right now.

[charley brown]

bill clinton, who is that?.....oh yeah, old i did not have sex with that woman, my cigar did. what a group of losers! with this group in charge no wonder the hostess company and so many other companies went out of business. i sure am going to miss my 4 or 5 twinkies with a good cup of hot coffee every mornint!

[charley brown]

thank goodness not everyone is dumb enough to eat up the pack of lies obama is dishing out. i can not wait to hear what hillary says in mid december when it is her turn to testify. i bet obama is bending over real far for the clintons now. i bet obama is shaking in his loafers over this one and trying to figgure out how he could have let bill clinton talk him into lieing to the american people about how 4 american citizens were killed and their dead bodies drug through the streets. petraeus told the truth yesterday because he was under oath about the attack on the lybian embassy . petraeus earlier said the attacks were because of a movie about the muslim religion. what a pack of liars we have running this country.

[Slapper John]

I'm surprised Petreuos made it to testify. I figured they'd find his body with a suicide note late Thursday night. He must have had a clue and stayed hunkered down somewhere.

[charley brown]

Slapper John wrote:

I'm surprised Petreuos made it to testify. I figured they'd find his body with a suicide note late Thursday night. He must have had a clue and stayed hunkered down somewhere.

i think you are right. old i did not have sex with that woman, my cigar did clinton has a whole lot of power in the political circles. i think an old army man who clawed his way to the top of the heap like petreus did is going to be pretty good at protecting himself, especially since he let the cat out of the bag about the talking points being cleaned of any info on the terrorist attack on the lybian embassy. obama has put himself in a bad spot with the clintons. i can't wait to hear from hillary when she runs for president in 2016. i would vote for her.

[joe]

Slapper John wrote:

I'm surprised Petreuos made it to testify. I figured they'd find his body with a suicide note late Thursday night. He must have had a clue and stayed hunkered down somewhere.

general BE TRAY US will conform his ststements to protect obama!this man served for many years but will let down what he stood for by being a yes man to obama!general chicken shit cassey did the same at fort hood!cassey was more worried for islamist than soldiers at fort hood if you care to remember?

[Slapper John]

joe wrote:

<quoted text>general BE TRAY US will conform his ststements to protect obama!this man served for many years but will let down what he stood for by being a yes man to obama!general chicken shit cassey did the same at fort hood!cassey was more worried for islamist than soldiers at fort hood if you care to remember?

You were right. He now claims they said all along it was terrorism. American seems to agree leading me to think Wolf Blitzer's glasses have been retrofitted with one of those MIB flashy things to erase memories. We don't remember anything about a video.

[gaytor_bayt]

Slapper John wrote:

<quoted text>
You were right. He now claims they said all along it was terrorism. American seems to agree leading me to think Wolf Blitzer's glasses have been retrofitted with one of those MIB flashy things to erase memories. We don't remember anything about a video.

If there was a White House conspiracy to cover up the truth, Republicans have yet to produce any evidence of it.

[Slapper John]

gaytor_bayt wrote:

<quoted text>
If there was a White House conspiracy to cover up the truth, Republicans have yet to produce any evidence of it.

A conspiracy? About what? Hey, where an I? How did I get here? Sure, ill have some cool aide.

[gaytor_bayt]

Slapper John wrote:

<quoted text>
A conspiracy? About what? Hey, where an I? How did I get here? Sure, ill have some cool aide.

A conspiracy was fairly well alluded to here

joe wrote:

<quoted text>general BE TRAY US will conform his ststements to protect obama!this man served for many years but will let down what he stood for by being a yes man to obama!general chicken shit cassey did the same at fort hood!cassey was more worried for islamist than soldiers at fort hood if you care to remember?

And here

Slapper John wrote:

<quoted text>
You were right. He now claims they said all along it was terrorism. American seems to agree leading me to think Wolf Blitzer's glasses have been retrofitted with one of those MIB flashy things to erase memories. We don't remember anything about a video.

Obama clip in Rose Garden Sept 12 addressing Libya attack.....

"acts of terror will not ever shake the great resolve of this great nation..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

[charley brown]

gaytor_bayt wrote:

<quoted text>
A conspiracy was fairly well alluded to here
<quoted text>
And here
<quoted text>
Obama clip in Rose Garden Sept 12 addressing Libya attack.....
"acts of terror will not ever shake the great resolve of this great nation..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch...

gas bag you should apply for the job of defending the liar in chief. you are always telling us " no that is not right, what he really said was..." . you are pretty smart for such a little guy and only 57 years old too. wow, gas bag i'm impressed with your intelligence gas bag. er btw which end did that bag of gas come out of?

[Slapper John]

Bayt , you and I are on differing thought levels. To argue with me about Dem vs. Rep. is like arguing about Rick Flair vs. Dusty Rhodes with someone who knows wrestling is one big fake show.

To embarrass yourself defending someone you've likely only seen on TV and someone who holds themselves elite above most of their subjects and someone who wouldn't piss on you if you we're on fire... I don't know, man.

They're rich, powerful, and rulers of the free world. I wouldn't stress out and run to their defense like they're one of my children everytome someone catches them in a blunder. Let them do it themselves. They wouldn't do it for you.

You spread this smoke screen about how no one has legally proven any type of conspiracy when on truth you have to know the strategic reason behind why they blamed a video. When your platform is that you've eradicated a terror group, it looks pretty bad for you ambassador to get killed a week before the election.

Let them defend that. We shouldn't have to take a list of talking points and run around making fools of ourselves spouting disinformation to folks who already know better. It hits our credibility. We should never have an issue demanding accountability from our leader no matter which party he comes from.

They should all understand that to hold this office is to come under the highest level of scrutiny when mistakes are made.

[freddyfudpucker]

Those are very true words posted by a very wise man.
I voted for Obama both times and I am so embarrassed and sorry that I did. Obama is a Chicago Politician. I lived in Chicago the first 29 years of my life and believe me you do not want to mess with a Chicago Politician. They know where all the bodies are buried so you can be sure Obama won't bury Hillary on top of General Betray Us or Susan Rice. If I were Susan Rice I would head for the hills because Obama is speaking out far too loud and far to nicely about her. just sayin.

[freddyfudpucker]

joe wrote:

<quoted text>general BE TRAY US will conform his ststements to protect obama!this man served for many years but will let down what he stood for by being a yes man to obama!general chicken shit cassey did the same at fort hood!cassey was more worried for islamist than soldiers at fort hood if you care to remember?

You hit the nail on the head there . the Fort Hood shooting was classified as a work place shooting, which I think should offend each and every person who calls themselves an American. It seems like Obama wants to protect the Muslims for some reason. I just can't get over Obama having a meeting with the head of the Muslim Brotherhood at the White House! What a piece of scum.

[gaytor_bayt]

Slapper John wrote:

Bayt , you and I are on differing thought levels. To argue with me about Dem vs. Rep. is like arguing about Rick Flair vs. Dusty Rhodes with someone who knows wrestling is one big fake show.
To embarrass yourself defending someone you've likely only seen on TV and someone who holds themselves elite above most of their subjects and someone who wouldn't piss on you if you we're on fire... I don't know, man.
They're rich, powerful, and rulers of the free world. I wouldn't stress out and run to their defense like they're one of my children everytome someone catches them in a blunder. Let them do it themselves. They wouldn't do it for you.
You spread this smoke screen about how no one has legally proven any type of conspiracy when on truth you have to know the strategic reason behind why they blamed a video. When your platform is that you've eradicated a terror group, it looks pretty bad for you ambassador to get killed a week before the election.
Let them defend that. We shouldn't have to take a list of talking points and run around making fools of ourselves spouting disinformation to folks who already know better. It hits our credibility. We should never have an issue demanding accountability from our leader no matter which party he comes from.
They should all understand that to hold this office is to come under the highest level of scrutiny when mistakes are made.

And once more my point is being missed.

On the surface, agreed, it looks like I'm defending the person. To a point I am. He holds a portion of all of our futures in his hands.

What I'm also defending is the opportunity he holds to effect our futures which has been and is being denied him. Whether the effect he implements will be good or bad remains to be seen.

Obama is demonized based on his "job performance" and anything else that could be made up. Why, I don't know. In any event he is more demonized since any Pres since Lincoln or Roosevelt it seems like. My original points were, he never had a sufficient opportunity to display his job performance. The only things of substance that made it through Congress in the last 4 years was Obamacare, which was passed via concession, and the lowering of our credit rating. The House has efficiently blocked nearly every move he has made. Why? I dunno. Without the House and Senate, there's not much he can do. With one half of Congress in gridlock, nothing gets done,, yet it isn't the White House that's gridlocked,, it's the House,,,, and Obama is blamed.

Who the Pres is imho is totally irrelevant. For all I care it could be some Chinese dude born in the U.S., raised in Scotland, a member of a party named the Philharmonic goat snot suckers, speaks with a French accent and named Long Duk Dong. If his agenda makes sense to me I'll point out imho he may be being judged a bit unfairly and harshly in whatever means is available to me. I'll also do it with points of fact instead of speculation. This is apples and oranges, but more than one person has been judged wrongly and imprisoned with nothing more than speculation [circumstantial evidence].

Yes, of course we have the right to hold whomever is in any elected office accountable. But why make up your mind when all the facts aren't in as of yet?

I sincerely doubt I have any more trust in a Gov official than you do, but I do my best to let the evidence speak for itself, and the evidence is still being collected.