Puppy Abortion okay to kill

Puppy Abortion okay to kill

Posted in the Paducah Forum


Gallatin, TN

#1 Nov 10, 2012
is it okay to kill a baby that is born prematurely?

is it okay to kill the baby before it is born?

how old does a baby need to be before it is NOT okay to kill it? Who decided this?

Is a baby that is born premature a real baby?

SOME vote that it is okay to kill the baby before it is born, before it has rights.

Is it okay to kill a puppy before it is born?

Gallatin, TN

#2 Nov 11, 2012
If it is okay to kill a baby that is born prematurely then it should be okay to abort a baby, makes sense.

Women's Rights not Premature Baby's Rights.

Women Vote

Premature Babies DON'T VOTE

Gallatin, TN

#3 Nov 11, 2012
Premature Baby's don't have Rights.

They are one group the democrats can't promise special rights.

Pedophiles have more rights.


Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#4 Nov 11, 2012
Who is aborting premature babies?

Gallatin, TN

#5 Nov 11, 2012
looks like all babies that are aborted die prematurely. The point is, if it's not okay to kill a baby born prematurely, then by the same logic it is not right to kill the baby before it is born.

Isn't the abortion organization called Planned Parenthood ?

Gallatin, TN

#6 Nov 11, 2012
If a baby that is born prematurely is human, then wasn't the same baby killed by abortion before it is born human?

It appears that some people voted for obama to ensure that planned parenthood continues to receive government money to keep the government funded abortions going. They call this women's rights.

How can killing a baby before it is born be a right. why do we need a government funded organization to make this so called right available so easily?

Shouldn't Americans be trying to minimize abortion instead of promoting it as a women's right?


Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#7 Nov 12, 2012
Is an erection a premature baby? Am I committing murder if I squeeze one out in the shower?

Gallatin, TN

#8 Nov 12, 2012
Life has the value that you give to it and humans are much less significant than they think they are. Other species kill and eat their own babies.

Killing is part of life. Nature kills. Killing often eliminates the weak, so the strong have more resources. Abortion helps the green and global warming cause by reducing population that uses energy. China allows one child.

The purpose of the democrats is to get rid of the traditional christian values and replace them with an anything goes society.

So if killing babies buys your party political power, then kill all you want. There is no law regulating what you do in the shower.

Gallatin, TN

#9 Nov 12, 2012
In America a woman has a right to kill her baby before it is born, IN china (communist) a woman has an obligation to kill her baby if she already has one.

Gallatin, TN

#10 Nov 12, 2012
A woman is much more powerful and influential than an unborn baby. The woman can vote democrat and make the baby helpless.

I see the democrats point, we are like china and we need to limit how many people are using our limited resources.

Many dictators have killed thousands of their own people at a time. The anything goes party.,

You can't really say you stand for freedom if part of your population is being murdered.

But not everyone wants to make their own decisions so dictators always find a place.
Modern Green Dictator

Gallatin, TN

#11 Nov 12, 2012
Modern Dictators monopolize control of each aspect of your life. Such as government controlled healthcare puts all the control in the hands of a few government people(communism and socialism do this).

Monopolized energy, monopolized banking and soon monopolized food. The government wants to control more and more and the people want a dictator.

Small business means freedom and competition. Big monopolized business means the federal government can control it with regulations and enforcement.

Today's Americans want someone that they must obey.

Dictators also have an enemies list.
Obama said vote for revenge, so somebody is going to get it.


Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#12 Nov 12, 2012
"Corporatism, also known as corporativism, is a system of economic, political, or social organization that involves association of the people of society into corporate groups, such as agricultural, business, ethnic, labour, military, patronage, or scientific affiliations, on the basis of common interests.[1] Corporatism is theoretically based upon the interpretation of a community as an organic body.[2][3] The term corporatism is based on the Latin root word "corpus" (plural - "corpora") meaning "body".[3]"

That's where we're at...not socialism, not communism, not capitalism
Modern Green Dictator

Gallatin, TN

#13 Nov 12, 2012
The exact technical definition of where we are headed may not have been invented yet. However, individual rights are being given up for and centralized, monopolized government control is taking over. The militarization of the federally funded and thus controlled local police bears remarkable similarities to a path to communism.

Local control and individual rights are being replaced with centralized federal control, call it what you want.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Paducah Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hal Mabry (Apr '16) 11 min Adam 109
Drug deal 13 min Jeff 3
Tori Shaw (Oct '14) 16 min The Tall Cool One 132
Ryan Jones 16 min Jamie 3
Drug house on Jefferson 42 min Deputy Dog 12
Judge Executive Bob Leeper 1 hr write WRONG 6
Dealo Starks 1 hr Will 2
Next coach at Paducah 14 hr lexi 26
Worst bosses in paducah (Aug '15) 15 hr Bus 61

Paducah Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Paducah Mortgages