We do not know for a fact he killed them
no one has been shown any proof.
he may be an innocent victim of someone else who has not been identified yet
I have ALOT of questions about the official version. BUT in order not to inspire or motivate other unstable people I'd rather call THE killer/s a child killer. When you use words like shooter or gunman these are words not only associated with video games & movies but you give the impression that the killer was on a mission/justify their acts. You put an aurora or mystic around these killers which helps give them infamy. Guilty or not these go down in history in infamy which many desire-they get their revenge and recognition/infamy they desire.
I agree there's alot more going on here than 'official' version letting information flow in a contrived trickle. The media agenda/bias is a given at this point so the margin of error on their reporting grows daily.
I can't believe they can't at least show a picture of the shot out window in the door or brass laying in the hallways and rooms. Or show some pictures of the alledged killers home also a crime scene. And why did police say in the first few days the investigation would take months-you have your suspect-right? And the second shooter, third shooter-initial reports of shooters in the prone firing position? And what about the man in the woods?
To me the key is the home. The smashed or gouged computer depending on which reporter you listen to. Something is being covered up. And the mother shot in bed in the head with a .22, this much alledged rage in a kid almost demands confrontation. If not some rogue government plot I do think there is a chance somekind of porn or pedophile ring is being covered up. And why the alledged confrontation at the school the day before?