Behind the Scenes: Picturing Fetal Remains

The photographs are graphic and detailed, showing the fingers or toes of aborted fetuses whose entire frames are no bigger than a cellphone. Since the mid-1990s, they have appeared all over the country — carried as posters by protesters, handed out with pamphlets or, in some cases, mounted like billboards on the sides of trucks. Like many others, I often wondered about the source of these images. Who took the pictures? Where did the fetuses come from?

[Observer]

Sad that modern technology should come to this disgusting option. Innocents being terminated because grown ups don't have any moral foundation. Abortion is straight from Hell and is the result of moral decay. Why would anyone want to decide who goes “left” and who goes “right” as in Auschitz. As Mr. Graham when he stated “God will have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah if he does not punish in this generation” (paraphrase)

[Church Slave]

Every mother that kills her child should be sent home with a photo of her child and a computerized photo of what the child might have looked like at 3, 5, 10, and as a young adult if she hadn't killed it.

It may cause her to think twice before killing another. This would be true compassion and true concern for the well being of the mother and the child.

[the Messiah]

Obama voted for denying Medical Attention to babies that survived an abortion. Preferred they die, cold, shivering & alone in a closet.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama...

[sue]

We have a problem with social security? We have wiped out an entire generation that would have been paying into the SS fund now. SS is a huge ponzi scheme and abortion has kicked the bottom out.

[Not The End]

100 abortion pictures dot com

That's what abortion doctors do to unborn babies.

[sassy jm]

Big Hoss wrote:

<quoted text>
Or maybe she could be sent home with a picture of the cardboard box shed live in when her child was 3, the camper trailer she could live in by 5, and the efficiency apartment at 10.
A woman having a child isnt always the little dreamboat lifestyle that PLers insist it is.

Many well-to-do couples who had planned pregnancies end up in those places too one day, when they lose their jobs.

Shall we justify killing "THEIR" children too so that they don't end up there?

*sigh*

[Sins of the Parents]

Church Slave wrote:

Every mother that kills her child should be sent home with a photo of her child and a computerized photo of what the child might have looked like at 3, 5, 10, and as a young adult if she hadn't killed it.
It may cause her to think twice before killing another. This would be true compassion and true concern for the well being of the mother and the child.

Why is it always the Mother that has to live with the Sin of Abortion? It took two to make that Fetus. If the husband or boyfriend didn't man up for their baby shouldnt he have to live with the consequence of that choice also? Didn't the Father have a hand in killing that baby also by your reasoning? Be sure the Father gets a copy of those computerized generated photos of his Baby.

[WeTheSheeple]

sassy jm wrote:

<quoted text>
Many well-to-do couples who had planned pregnancies end up in those places too one day, when they lose their jobs.
Shall we justify killing "THEIR" children too so that they don't end up there?
*sigh*

Yes. Abortion should be legal up to age 18 (22 if you're paying for their college)

[WeTheSheeple]

Actually the best way to stop abortion would be to sterilize all the women! Problem solved.

[mlc9852]

Big Hoss wrote:

<quoted text>
Or maybe she could be sent home with a picture of the cardboard box shed live in when her child was 3, the camper trailer she could live in by 5, and the efficiency apartment at 10.
A woman having a child isnt always the little dreamboat lifestyle that PLers insist it is.

Why not let the child be adopted?

[mlc9852]

Big Hoss wrote:

To whoever flagged my post as dumb, please feel free to point out how a pregnancy is always a blessing to a mother who does not want to have a child.

No one said it's always a blessing, but it's a life. A human life. If a child becomes a burden, can we murder it?

[mlc9852]

Sins of the Parents wrote:

<quoted text>Why is it always the Mother that has to live with the Sin of Abortion? It took two to make that Fetus. If the husband or boyfriend didn't man up for their baby shouldnt he have to live with the consequence of that choice also? Didn't the Father have a hand in killing that baby also by your reasoning? Be sure the Father gets a copy of those computerized generated photos of his Baby.

If the father wants the child, the mother should not be allowed to have an abortion.

[Ink]

Big Hoss wrote:

<quoted text>
Or maybe she could be sent home with a picture of the cardboard box shed live in when her child was 3, the camper trailer she could live in by 5, and the efficiency apartment at 10.
A woman having a child isnt always the little dreamboat lifestyle that PLers insist it is.

No one gets a guaranteed perfect life but all of us have had a chance to make one for ourselves. I'm glad no one decided for me before I was born.

[Ink]

Sins of the Parents wrote:

<quoted text>Why is it always the Mother that has to live with the Sin of Abortion? It took two to make that Fetus. If the husband or boyfriend didn't man up for their baby shouldnt he have to live with the consequence of that choice also? Didn't the Father have a hand in killing that baby also by your reasoning? Be sure the Father gets a copy of those computerized generated photos of his Baby.

If he wanted her to abort, I agree. Women are making it real easy for men to be completely irresponsible. The women says, it's their body and they will decide and the men say okey dokey.

[WeTheSheeple]

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why not let the child be adopted?

So how many have you adopted? 10, 20, 30??

OMG, have you been in a animal shelter recently? If people aren't willing to adopt enough cats or dogs to close the shelters, HOW on earth do you think they're going take on the financial costs of adopting all the unwanted children??

The answer to both problems is the same- mass sterilization.

[WeTheSheeple]

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
If the father wants the child, the mother should not be allowed to have an abortion.

ONLY if the father agrees to carry the child in his womb for 9 months! Oh wait, the average man doesn't HAVE a womb? All he did was donate some sperm that would have otherwise ended up on the sheets or in the trashcan? Maybe he should have thought about that before spewing indiscriminately all over anything that spreads it's legs for him.

[WeTheSheeple]

mlc9852 wrote:

<quoted text>
No one said it's always a blessing, but it's a life. A human life. If a child becomes a burden, can we murder it?

Yes you can. You'll probably go to jail or the "gallows", but you most certainly CAN murder your child. In fact, MANY have done so time & time again, yet are STILL allowed to continue breeding.

[WeTheSheeple]

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
If he wanted her to abort, I agree. Women are making it real easy for men to be completely irresponsible. The women says, it's their body and they will decide and the men say okey dokey.

You're right. We should force them to get married and have that baby. Then we'll have to act REALLY suprised when the mother or father end up killing that kid later and then get divorced.

Excellent plan!

[mlc9852]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes you can. You'll probably go to jail or the "gallows", but you most certainly CAN murder your child. In fact, MANY have done so time & time again, yet are STILL allowed to continue breeding.

So you agree that it is wrong to kill your child?

[BHOsux]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

Actually the best way to stop abortion would be to sterilize all the women! Problem solved.

Better yet, vasectomies for all men. With no anesthesia.