anybody else get a letter from ob/gyn...

anybody else get a letter from ob/gyn (m.g.) wanting support?

Posted in the Owingsville Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
BABY ON BOARD

Olive Hill, KY

#1 Aug 29, 2007
I have been seeing an OB/ GYN in Lexington for about 5 years now. The other day I received a letter from his office saying that he has a court date coming up in a couple of weeks and that they are asking his patients to be there to support him. Has anyone else around here received this letter?
NO WAY HO ZAY

Olive Hill, KY

#2 Aug 29, 2007
yeah, i got one. i don't go to that moron anymore and would never dream of supporting his greedy a**. Whatever he did wrong that he needs support for, he deserves!!!!!
BABY ON BOARD

Owingsville, KY

#4 Sep 5, 2007
I read in the Lex. Herald where he was sanctioned by the judge for attempt to coerce the jury. That is not good, so now the trial is rescheduled. From what I understand they should just castrate him like he does all these women (his # is 136 per year and the NATIONAL average is 15!!!).
Emma

Owingsville, KY

#5 Sep 5, 2007
To all you ladies that this sick man has castrated you by taking out your healthy uteri and ovaries, I am praying for you. I can not even imagine what you have nor what you are going through. Obviously this man stole something very intimate from you. You will never be able to get that back but just know that on Judgement Day God will punish greedy people like that. In the meantime, God Bless you.
Truth

Morehead, KY

#6 Sep 5, 2007
If the parts he put UK on were left in my body, it would be a different story, but they weren't, they were sent to the lab for testing. As far as I am concerned, he could have written the Gettysburg Address on mine female organs, as long as they were not left in my body.

He is a good Christian man, and I know that he has made a few mistakes, he is human. I have been going to him for many, many years, and have not had a bad experience, and he has done several MAJOR surgeries on me. I too got the tape of my surgery, I saw the UK plainly on the part of my body that he took out, but it didn't phase me, it went to the lab to make sure I didn't have cancer, it wasn't in my body. Even if it were, who would see it? No one.
meme

Owingsville, KY

#7 Sep 5, 2007
Didn't he grow up here in Bath Co.? Ha, just goes to show that your sins WILL find you out. I bet he is buddies with some of our rule breakers.
Truth

Morehead, KY

#8 Sep 5, 2007
I do think that he has too many patients though, that could be part of the problem.
meme

Owingsville, KY

#9 Sep 6, 2007
In response To him putting UK on the uterus-that is not why he is being sued. He is being sued because he lied and told women they had (whatever disease) and removed healthy uteri, cervixes, and most importantly-ovaries. This is a pretty serious matter. It may not have "phased" you about him branding you with his alma mater but i bet it would phase you if you foound out he lied to you and misinformed you snd that you had perfectly healthy organs removed!
Truth

Morehead, KY

#10 Sep 6, 2007
Yes, that is a different story. I completely understand that. I didn't realize that is why he was being sued. I'm sorry that anyone had to go through that.
meme wrote:
In response To him putting UK on the uterus-that is not why he is being sued. He is being sued because he lied and told women they had (whatever disease) and removed healthy uteri, cervixes, and most importantly-ovaries. This is a pretty serious matter. It may not have "phased" you about him branding you with his alma mater but i bet it would phase you if you foound out he lied to you and misinformed you snd that you had perfectly healthy organs removed!
bonzo66

AOL

#11 Sep 6, 2007
To all you morons that only think you know what you're talking about:
1. Yes, he is from Bath Co.(graduated in '69)
2. The reason he burned the "UK" on the infected uterus was to mark where he started so he could make sure he completely cut around the organ before removing it through the vagina. If he was doing something wrong, why did he video tape the procedure and give it to his patients after the proceduire?
3. The lawsuit is all about money. If you don't believe me, why did these people hire the modern day pariah, the Becker law office? This firm is predatory in every way.
4. I've know Dr. Guiler since high school and can tell you he is as honest and ethical as anyone in the business.
5. Dr. Guiler has the best Ob-Gyn practice in this area, which is why the Becker people went after him. Becker likes deep pockets.
Truth

Morehead, KY

#12 Sep 6, 2007
That's exactly how I see it.
bonzo66 wrote:
To all you morons that only think you know what you're talking about:
1. Yes, he is from Bath Co.(graduated in '69)
2. The reason he burned the "UK" on the infected uterus was to mark where he started so he could make sure he completely cut around the organ before removing it through the vagina. If he was doing something wrong, why did he video tape the procedure and give it to his patients after the proceduire?
3. The lawsuit is all about money. If you don't believe me, why did these people hire the modern day pariah, the Becker law office? This firm is predatory in every way.
4. I've know Dr. Guiler since high school and can tell you he is as honest and ethical as anyone in the business.
5. Dr. Guiler has the best Ob-Gyn practice in this area, which is why the Becker people went after him. Becker likes deep pockets.
Sweet Niblets

Owingsville, KY

#13 Sep 7, 2007
No, you are the moron! Who cares about the UK branding?
1) Yes, it was unethical and at the time for every 1 doctor he had say that this procedure was acceptable, there were 2 doctors saying it was not acceptable and that they never had to use a "line of reference".
2)The law suit is not anything about the UK branding, which the uterus was not infected dip shit, it was healthy.
3)These people are not using the Becker Law office, nice try, they do the car wrecks and hurt on the job. They have Pillersdorf, Heistand and Popplewell if you must know.
4)Once again, it is not about the UK thing, it is about him coercing women into having hysterectomies by telling them that they have horrible fibroids, endometriosis,ect. When in reality, he is removing healthy organs from very young women, many of which were not finished having children. He averages ~140 hysts a year while the national average for doctors equivilant to his training and hospital priviliges is only 15. So, he is about 120 over quota.
Organ Donor

Owingsville, KY

#14 Sep 7, 2007
He's a Christian?
He's a caring man?
Oh yeah, is that why he was screwing his nurse several years ago while he was still married to his wife?
Is that why he continued to carry on the extramarital affair with his nurse for quiet a while?
Is that why his "nurse" finally convinced him to leave his wife and kides?
Is that why he lies to women about needing surgeries?
Is that why having babies don't cost anywhere near what surgeries cost.
Oh, is that why he, his wife and employees sent letters out trying to get people to picket the courthouse?

ARE THESE CHRISTIAN VALUES-I HOPE NOT
Sweet Niblets

Owingsville, KY

#15 Sep 7, 2007
Oh, it has NOTHING to do with money. The women suing him do not need his money to live. The man actually belongs in criminal court but that is impossible so for now punishing him by hurting his pockets will partially serve justice. I love all the $ he's already lost just paying his attorney ($100,000)
kentucky girl fer shore

Morehead, KY

#16 Sep 7, 2007
wonder whose doing who?quit nosing in peoples sex lives.
Sweet Niblets

Owingsville, KY

#17 Sep 7, 2007
I could care less who the freak sleeps with except that he claims to practice a "christian demeanor", GAG!!!!
bonzo66

AOL

#19 Sep 7, 2007
1. Every predatory lawyer can find another doctor or even two that are willing to testify to the contrary in court; for a fee of course.
2. The issue of whether the organ was infected or diseased is a matter of testing by a qualified labortory. No doctor in his right mind would proceed without such backup. Guiler is not stupid
3. The Herald-Leader reported that the Becker Law Office orignated this lawsuit. Since such firms normally try and force a settlement out of court, I'd be willing to bet they've contracted out the trial to the firm you've mentioned.
4. Any woman being recommended to have a hysterectomy should seek a second opinion to confirm the original findings. This is standard medical practice and one that my wife went through in deciding to proceed.

Finally, the numbers you refer to are irrevelent. A lot of doctors doing OB/GYN have switched to other specialities in recent years, primarily because of liability issues from predatory lawyers. This has left a few doctors like Dr. Guiler that are willing to perform necessary women's services as have been previously mentioned. I've never seen any "quota" that you stated and would conclude this is something the trial bar has made up as an argument for the plaintiffs.
Sweet Niblets wrote:
No, you are the moron! Who cares about the UK branding?
1) Yes, it was unethical and at the time for every 1 doctor he had say that this procedure was acceptable, there were 2 doctors saying it was not acceptable and that they never had to use a "line of reference".
2)The law suit is not anything about the UK branding, which the uterus was not infected dip shit, it was healthy.
3)These people are not using the Becker Law office, nice try, they do the car wrecks and hurt on the job. They have Pillersdorf, Heistand and Popplewell if you must know.
4)Once again, it is not about the UK thing, it is about him coercing women into having hysterectomies by telling them that they have horrible fibroids, endometriosis,ect. When in reality, he is removing healthy organs from very young women, many of which were not finished having children. He averages ~140 hysts a year while the national average for doctors equivilant to his training and hospital priviliges is only 15. So, he is about 120 over quota.
who cares

United States

#20 Sep 10, 2007
Sweet Niblets wrote:
No, you are the moron! Who cares about the UK branding?
1) Yes, it was unethical and at the time for every 1 doctor he had say that this procedure was acceptable, there were 2 doctors saying it was not acceptable and that they never had to use a "line of reference".
2)The law suit is not anything about the UK branding, which the uterus was not infected dip shit, it was healthy.
3)These people are not using the Becker Law office, nice try, they do the car wrecks and hurt on the job. They have Pillersdorf, Heistand and Popplewell if you must know.
4)Once again, it is not about the UK thing, it is about him coercing women into having hysterectomies by telling them that they have horrible fibroids, endometriosis,ect. When in reality, he is removing healthy organs from very young women, many of which were not finished having children. He averages ~140 hysts a year while the national average for doctors equivilant to his training and hospital priviliges is only 15. So, he is about 120 over quota.
You sure are awfully familiar with the case. Are you one of the gold diggers in Guiler's pocket? Why don't you get off your butt and get a job and quit letting your husband work his butt off supporting you!!
mt sterling

Jackson, KY

#21 Sep 10, 2007
i went to dr guiler for 15 years, he did my hysterecomy on me and i think these people are just after his money
Oragan Donor

Olive Hill, KY

#22 Sep 11, 2007
"Dear Who Cares"
Thanks for your input, but I DO work, my husband does not support me, and I am not part of this lawsuit, I just happen to care alot about a person who this doctor has castrated and removed perfectly healthy organs from! I have seen all of her records. The pathology report from the hospital shows "NO endometriosis, NO cancerous tissue, NO fibroids, ovaries and uterus pink and within normal range, NO remarkable findings!!

Nobody wants this mans money!! I believe that if my friend had a choice she would rather have him castrated just like he did her and see how it affects the rest of his life.

You people are weird, you want to jump and sue the first person who hurts your feelings on forums such as this but when someone is actually told they need a hysterectomy, signs the papers to have ONLY their utereus removed b/c they know the ramifications of ovary removal, then wake up to the devastation of learning they were removed AGAINST their consent, and attempt to pursue action against such action, then you wig out....makes alot of sense, sue b/c you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar and people are discussing it....but don't take action against someone who removes your organs against your consent....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Owingsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hunt Brothers 11 hr Cardboard topping 2
News Three arrested at meth lab in Bath County (Feb '12) 18 hr cathy 26
stumpy loves beer 20 hr not stumpy 3
joe mccarty and bath salt 20 hr cracker 1
Toys for Tots Question (Dec '12) Fri Nanabanana94 60
i want stumpy to eat mud Thu G Gordon Flash Ti... 2
stump got a arm pit Thu not stumpy 4

Owingsville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Owingsville Mortgages