'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 239439 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144090 Jan 11, 2014
RayOne wrote:
OBAMA is the pResident On Board.
YES he is. Elected not ONCE, but TWICE by the MAJORITY. Suck it up crybaby.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#144091 Jan 11, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
Unemployment under Bush 4.6, and under Obama 11.6. Rookies should not play in the majors.
Unemployment when flubs was run out of DC...7%. LMAO.
republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144092 Jan 11, 2014
Ted Cruz is Angry that President Obama Isn’t Arresting Colorado Pot Smokers – Seriously

Hard-right conservatives love to talk about states’ rights and quote the 10th Amendment, which reads as follows:“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Every single chance they get, out comes the 10th Amendment – when it comes to anything from the Affordable Care Act to even the Common Core States Standards Initiative. Yes, even setting a common educational standard for kids is an egregious act of overreach by the federal government which must be fought at all costs in their minds. After all, any time the federal government tells a state they can’t restrict the rights of someone to vote or that they can’t racially profile people, here comes every expert on the United States Constitution to talk on Fox News about activist judges and federal overreach.

So you’d think that when Colorado decides to do something as long overdue as legalizing marijuana, these same cheerleaders of states’ rights and minimal federal government would respect that decision, right? Wrong. Senator Ted Cruz criticized President Obama for not imprisoning people in Colorado for using cannabis because, while it is perfectly legal for adults over 21 there, it’s still illegal under federal law.

Therefore, since it involves one of the three things the Tea Party seem to hates the most (sex, drugs and Obama), obviously the Department of Justice had better get to treading on the state of Colorado’s rights right away. Seriously, here’s what he had to say:

Cruz said the Obama administration should continue imprisoning people for using marijuana until federal law is changed.

“You can go to Congress, you can get a conversation, you could get Democrats and Republicans who would say,‘We ought to change our drug policy in some way,’ and you could have a real conversation, you could have hearings, you could look at the problem, you could discuss commonsense changes that maybe should happen or shouldn’t happen. This president didn’t do that. He just said,‘The laws say one thing’— and mind you these are criminal laws, these are laws that say if you do ‘X, Y, and Z’ you will go to prison. The president announced,‘No, you won’t.’”(Source)

Ah the GOP. The party of limited government – except when they want it all up in your ovaries, your bedroom and your local marijuana dispensary. You gotta love the hypocrisy.

At least we know Senator Cruz just alienated another segment of the voting public ahead of the 2016 election. It just never ceases to amaze me how blatantly hypocritical these “small government conservatives” can be when it suits them.

http://www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-i...

HAHA, what an idiot. Such hypocrites.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#144093 Jan 11, 2014
They are all DeceptiCONS.....Big Money rules the world...F'em all! Time for the Big Gangs to desintigrate before World War III, and Obama will do all he can to keep us free Americans from our guns and AMMO....It's happening right under everyone's nose but we are to stupid to see it...NWO...New World Order.......Remember

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#144094 Jan 11, 2014
republiCONS wrote:
<quoted text>
YES he is. Elected not ONCE, but TWICE by the MAJORITY. Suck it up crybaby.
RIP GOP
DITCH MITCH
You mean...Got elected twice by the electoral college...lol..which is another form of control.
republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144095 Jan 11, 2014
Tea Party Seeks To Replace House Leader Eric Cantor With Even More Extreme Candidate

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is often seen as the real hand of power among House Republicans in Congress. If it’s a choice between Cantor and Speaker John Boehner, the Tea Party caucus would rather follow Cantor. That may be true in the House, but the Tea Party itself would love nothing more than to replace Eric Cantor in 2014.
The Tea Party intends to challenge Eric Cantor in a primary with their strongest candidate yet.

Apparently, Eric Cantor isn’t an insane enough of a conservative for the Tea Party. That why they intend to run a candidate against him in a primary this year in Virginia. David Brat, an economics professor at Randolph-Macon College, seeks to unseat the long-time Virginia congressman.

“I want to be Eric Cantor’s term-limit,” Brat told the National Review. Adding weight to his candidacy, Brat has been meeting with some “big as they get” right-wing groups about supporting his campaign financially. If he manages to get such funding, Brat could be the biggest threat to Cantor’s career yet.“I think it’s safe to say it will definitely rattle some cages when it comes out,” Brat says of the potential donors. But why do the Tea Party and David Brat want to kick Cantor out of the House?

Even though Republicans shut down the government and threatened a debt ceiling default in October, they still failed to repeal the landmark healthcare law. They failed because Americans overwhelmingly turned against the GOP, causing the party’s popularity to drop to historic lows. Ultimately, sane Republicans like Cantor decided that repealing Obamacare wasn’t worth sacrificing economic security of America. Unlike Cantor, Brat intends to “move the ball down the field” on that front, meaning he’d probably be one of the extreme few who would continue the shutdown and let the US Government default on the debt. As an economics professor, you’d think Brat would know that default is a bad thing for the economy. But that’s not all.

Brat also opposes the recent compromise budget drawn up by Democratic Senator Patty Murray and Republican Rep. Paul Ryan. In addition, Brat is farther to the right on immigration issues as well.
Americans hate the Tea Party and extreme right-wing candidates rarely win general elections.

As horrible as Republicans are doing in the polls, the Tea Party is doing so much worse. At the peak of the shutdown, only 21 percent of Americans had a positive view of the Tea Party. Tea Party favorability also reached record lows in a Dec. 2013 Gallup Poll. Even one-third of conservatives don’t like them.

Given those numbers, and the fact that Brat is even more extreme than Cantor, if he were to win his primary challenge, Democrats would have a better chance of taking back Cantor’s seat. Thus, Democrats would gain one more seat toward the ultimate goal of taking back the House. As the Tea Party continues to take the GOP further to the extreme right-wing and takes out saner Republicans in the process, Democrats will face less difficulty in general elections. After all, America wants a candidate who isn’t extreme, one that is willing to cross the aisle and find compromise. The Tea Party has absolutely no interest in doing that. Their only goal is unconditional surrender or mass destruction. Very few Americans will support that kind of vision. In the end, the Tea Party could end up being the best player on the Democrat’s team. And Eric Cantor could be the biggest Republican player to be knocked out of the game before it even starts.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/01/11/tea-p...

Love it when they eat their own.

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH
republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144096 Jan 11, 2014
For 5 years you have been told Obama is gonna knock on your door
and take your guns.

And for 5 years gun manufacturers have enjoyed record profits

How does it feel to be played for suckers?

haha, Still lying about the gun grab. Dumbasses

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#144097 Jan 11, 2014
You people are Bookworms who think you make a difference..You're just arguing about lies and distrust trying to beef up both of your Gang like parties reputations..When really you're to stupid to realize the downward spiral this country faces if we continue on this Ridiculous ride...It's happening...NWO...Remember my words.
just watching

Flint, MI

#144098 Jan 11, 2014
republiCONS wrote:
<quoted text>
YES he is. Elected not ONCE, but TWICE by the MAJORITY. Suck it up crybaby.
RIP GOP
DITCH MITCH
the MAJORITY? LOLOLOL, 28% of the voters in this country is the MAJORITY?

LOLOL,
just watching

Flint, MI

#144100 Jan 11, 2014
LI0NSDEN wrote:
You people are Bookworms who think you make a difference..You're just arguing about lies and distrust trying to beef up both of your Gang like parties reputations..When really you're to stupid to realize the downward spiral this country faces if we continue on this Ridiculous ride...It's happening...NWO...Remember my words.
you are correct! downward spiral and out of control, sudden stop at the bottom, plenty of blame to go around,

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#144102 Jan 11, 2014
Do Not call a Marxist, a Fascist Yet.

Level 1

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#144103 Jan 11, 2014
republiCONS wrote:
For 5 years you have been told Obama is gonna knock on your door
and take your guns.
And for 5 years gun manufacturers have enjoyed record profits
How does it feel to be played for suckers?
haha, Still lying about the gun grab. Dumbasses
RIP GOP
DITCH MITCH
If what you say is true; that makes "Anti-Gun" Democrats the "insider" for all gun manufacturers! After all is said and done they continue to shout and scream for MORE GUN CONTROL! Colorado ousted some very vocal gun control advocates recently in recall elections. Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein along with Chuck Schumer must be in the hip pocket for gun companies!
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#144104 Jan 11, 2014
Democrat Terry McAuliffe sworn in as Virginia governor.

teahadist ken cuccinelli, is somewhere selling pencils. LMAO.
republiCONS

Elizabethtown, KY

#144105 Jan 11, 2014
LI0NSDEN wrote:
<quoted text>You mean...Got elected twice by the electoral college...lol..which is another form of control.
hahaha pathetic loser lemmings. At least he didn't have to have his brother and his republiCON appointed Supreme Court to steal the election now did he little kitty? Chads, anyone? hahahaha

Obama’s Margin of Victory is Now Bigger than Both of George W. Bush’s Wins

As of now, President Obama’s popular margin of victory is bigger than both of George W. Bush’s election wins in 2000 and 2004.

According to the numbers compiled by David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report, President Obama now leads Mitt Romney 50.81%-47.48% in the popular vote. President Obama’s popular vote margin is now bigger than both of the last two successful Republican presidential elections. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the popular vote to Al Gore, 48.38%-47.87%. In 2004, George W. Bush defeated John Kerry in the popular vote, 50.73%-48.27%. Obama is currently posting the biggest margin of victory since Bill Clinton beat Bob Dole, 49.24%-40.71% in 1996.

What was supposed to be a nail biter of an election turned out to be only the 13th closest election in US history. Obama’s margin of victory was bigger than four other modern era (since 1952) winning candidates. George W. Bush (2000 & 2004), Jimmy Carter (1976), and Richard Nixon (1968) all had smaller margins of victory than Obama did.

http://www.politicususa.com/2012/11/26/obamas...

Poor pathetic loser lemmings. hahaha

RIP GOP

DITCH MITCH

Level 1

Since: May 11

Glasgow, UK

#144106 Jan 11, 2014
just watching wrote:
<quoted text>
I challenge any libtard on this forum to explain how the Clintons and Obamas got their millions, and who are they trying to stop from getting the same,
you two faced libtards on here deserve everything you get, high unemployment, high taxes and the economic downturn that the Wall St. economists claim we are primed for,
http://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-t...

you didn't look very far

Level 2

Since: Oct 09

.

#144107 Jan 11, 2014
Reid:" We’re amenable to GOP unemployment amendments"

Republicans have introduced more than 20 amendments with suggestions on how to pay for a short-term extension to federal unemployment benefits that expired Dec. 28. Ideas range from ending tax fraud by illegal immigrants claiming a child tax credit to not allowing people to collect disability and unemployment benefits at the same time

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/...
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#144108 Jan 11, 2014
Ari son of Anarchy wrote:
Reid:" We’re amenable to GOP unemployment amendments"
Republicans have introduced more than 20 amendments with suggestions on how to pay for a short-term extension to federal unemployment benefits that expired Dec. 28. Ideas range from ending tax fraud by illegal immigrants claiming a child tax credit to not allowing people to collect disability and unemployment benefits at the same time
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/...
When are they going to introduce a bill to end corporate welfare? That will pay for long term unemployment. LMAO.
conservative crapola

“Hicksville Hootenanny”

Since: Sep 13

Kornfield Kounty

#144110 Jan 11, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
There is not such thing as corporate welfare, that is a made up word by liberals
Do you prefer 'stealing from taxpayers'? That's a notion that teahadist likes to purport, all the time. LMAO.

Level 2

Since: Oct 09

.

#144112 Jan 11, 2014
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
When are they going to introduce a bill to end corporate welfare? That will pay for long term unemployment. LMAO.
Corporations are NOT people, corporations are made up of people...just trying to earn a living.

"If it is in the public interest to maintain an industry, it is clearly not in the public interest by the impact of regulatory authority to destroy its otherwise viable way of life"
John F. Kennedy - Special Message to the Congress on Regulatory Agencies-, April 13, 1961

Liberal/Progressivism has become a revisor of economic history to the point of dumbing down America!
Brad

Bolton, CT

#144113 Jan 11, 2014
SevenTee wrote:
<quoted text>
There is not such thing as corporate welfare, that is a made up word by liberals
Its right up there with,"polar vortex."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Owensboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Patrick Wilson aka project (Mar '12) 6 min iNeedHim 17
Brooke Moss 24 min Al Gorks mom 17
Heather Howard 36 min truth 4
Ed dowdy 1 hr Real hubby 7
Larrywayne Husk 1 hr karen 13
Tiffany Johnson 1 hr Real hubby 5
Apology 1 hr Real hubby 2

Owensboro Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Owensboro Mortgages