Does anyone actually support Obama as...
Mr Tin

Owensboro, KY

#128 Jan 26, 2013
big package wrote:
<quoted text>
They can't see past the brims of those oversized tinfoil hats.
Tinfoil hats are never oversized. Their purpose is to stop electromagnetic waves of various wavelengths. Their size has to be exactly right, to tune the exact wavelengths, and avoid problems with standing waves and hot spots. Hot spots can be a deceptive method of causing the unsuspecting victim to remove the hat and get the head wet.
john

Owensboro, KY

#129 Jan 26, 2013
Are the questions I'm asking too hard?

Or can you admit that I'm right? We all voted for something different and got the same old sh*t.
We've been swindled. And you worship your president like a king.
john

Owensboro, KY

#130 Jan 26, 2013
Liberal Wisenheimer wrote:
<quoted text>
What makes you believe we're not against those things now?
We're still in various ongoing skirmishes in the middle East, Obama still stands in the way of personal freedoms in regards to what one puts in his own body, Guatanamo Bay is still open, NDAA 2012 and 2013, the hundreds of children killed by Obama's illegal drone campaign. We're currently arming extremist groups in Syria.
I could keep going. If you all were truly against these things, Obama's approval rating wouldn't be as high as it were now.

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#131 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
No, he's a right-wing totalitarian just like George W. Bush. He's a democrat during campaign season, but a republican the rest of the time.
He only won the nomination because The Republican nominee was a Mormon extremist who was even more blood-thirsty.
Remember how you so-called liberals were against the drug war, against foreign occupation, against needless violence and brutality when W. was in office? What happened to that?
wtf is this mess now? Brilliant argument there. Is it just me or can I actually see the spit flying out of your mouth?

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#132 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
<quoted text>
We're still in various ongoing skirmishes in the middle East, Obama still stands in the way of personal freedoms in regards to what one puts in his own body, Guatanamo Bay is still open, NDAA 2012 and 2013, the hundreds of children killed by Obama's illegal drone campaign. We're currently arming extremist groups in Syria.
I could keep going. If you all were truly against these things, Obama's approval rating wouldn't be as high as it were now.
Yeah man!!! You're exactly right... Obama's death team targets Muslim children for drone assassinations. Please close your ignorant mouth hole.

Personal freedoms huh? So YOU should be able to decide what you put into YOUR body, but God damn don't ever let one of dem womens think about getting an abortion? We're gonna make that illegal right? Maybe we should beat them too, just so they know how serious you are. SO totally typical. YOU want all the freedom in the world. 100%, unequivocal, but don't dare let anyone else ask for the same consideration.

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#133 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
<quoted text>
We're still in various ongoing skirmishes in the middle East, Obama still stands in the way of personal freedoms in regards to what one puts in his own body, Guatanamo Bay is still open, NDAA 2012 and 2013, the hundreds of children killed by Obama's illegal drone campaign. We're currently arming extremist groups in Syria.
I could keep going. If you all were truly against these things, Obama's approval rating wouldn't be as high as it were now.
Yeah and if you were forced to use ACTUAL facts, you'd have NO argument at all. Who told you we're arming extremists in Syria? I think I MIGHT know a bit more about what's going on there right now than you do? You have some contact in the NSA I don't know about? Sister in the Special Forces?

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#134 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
Someone, please tell me what's so vastly different about George W. Bush's time in office and Barrack Obama's time in office?
You all have lost your backbone. You used to stand for something.
And it's quite sad...
You're right. I have no backbone. I've NEVER stood for anything. I only believe (no matter how nonsensical) what I'm fed.

Oh sorry, that's you. Have you EVER served your fellow man in ANY capacity? Anywhere, at any time? Ever? Did something bigger than yourself? Ever?

Yeah, you're right.

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#135 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
Are the questions I'm asking too hard?
Or can you admit that I'm right? We all voted for something different and got the same old sh*t.
We've been swindled. And you worship your president like a king.
Who is this "we all"? You mean YOU did. And didn't win. TOO f'n bad douche. It's just sour grapes. You love the term 'whiny liberal'. You seem pretty damn whiny right now. You want different SO desperately? SO totally dissatisfied with OUR country? Leave. Kill yourself. I promise we won't try to stop you. You want your personal freedom so bad? There you go.
summitcoalminer

Richmond, KY

#136 Jan 26, 2013
john wrote:
No, he's a right-wing totalitarian just like George W. Bush. He's a democrat during campaign season, but a republican the rest of the time.
He only won the nomination because The Republican nominee was a Mormon extremist who was even more blood-thirsty.
Remember how you so-called liberals were against the drug war, against foreign occupation, against needless violence and brutality when W. was in office? What happened to that?
John, I don't think the war on drugs has ever waned since Reagan started it in the 80's. The drawdown has happened,we are out of iraq and down 39% in afganistan and to be totally withdrawn by 2015. And if you've not noticed we got Bin Laden and the surgical use of drone strikes has risen as to not put our soldiers or civilians in harms way. I don't see your. point

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#137 Jan 26, 2013
summitcoalminer wrote:
<quoted text>
John, I don't see your. point
You either? It's seems to just be random, wild talking points neither linked to any actual policy or even factual in some cases.
curious

United States

#138 Jan 26, 2013
TheRealOldSchool wrote:
<quoted text>They control more and more wealth because we allow the poor to continue to receive more and more handouts. When we increase the amount of what they get for free, what is their incentive to work? What is their incentive to become better? When we have a president who promises to give them more than they already have, what creates a drive to be better?
The people at the top whose share of the wealth continues to rapidly expand could help out by paying their employees a fair share of the profits they've helped to create, and that couldn't have been created without their labor. Yes, everyone should work, but work should pay a living wage. When you can work full time for one of the largest, most profitable corporations in the world (Walmart) and still be eligible for government benefits, it tells a story about the failure of corporate America to do its share. I disagree with the validity of the point you're making in regard to people choosing welfare over work (yes, there will always be some who game the system), but I believe that the vast majority of people prefer to earn their keep fairly. It's a said fact that a family of four in America can have two full-time wage earners and still live in poverty, and at the same time their employers are making record profits and paying historically low tax levels.
Nick

Owensboro, KY

#139 Jan 27, 2013
Big package, How many references have you made to beating women, disliking black people, and how many names have you resorted to calling during your time posting. Yet claim everyone else is the one who believes these things, and if my memory serves me correct no one else has made such a statement
Once again, Government should not be so large they decide if you wear a helmet, a seat belt, or what food you can consume, even down to who has permission to build on their own property, that they bought and pay taxes on every year. Why is it any of the governments business whether I put a porch or shed in the country? Renovations...ect. Or even if I want to build a home for a family member on my property, that I own in full? I earned that. They need to approve or deny it, then tax you on your costs.
That, is excessive government control. And we look right past it, accept it. I don't think government would need near as much money from us, if they weren't sticking their nose where is doesn't belong or need to be. Feds put an end to an amish man selling unpasteurized milk. Shouldn't it be our choice if we want natural foods or not? Where does the government draw the line in interfering with our lives? Most of my family in America have been farmers in the past. If it weren't for growing their own food, and working hard, WE may not have been here today. Not sure if this link will be clickable
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/apr/...
MattM

Hopkinsville, KY

#140 Jan 27, 2013
I support him with reservations. I think he is doing a great job under the circumstances.

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#141 Jan 27, 2013
Nick wrote:
Big package, How many references have you made to beating women, disliking black people, and how many names have you resorted to calling during your time posting. Yet claim everyone else is the one who believes these things, and if my memory serves me correct no one else has made such a statement
Once again, Government should not be so large they decide if you wear a helmet, a seat belt, or what food you can consume, even down to who has permission to build on their own property, that they bought and pay taxes on every year. Why is it any of the governments business whether I put a porch or shed in the country? Renovations...ect. Or even if I want to build a home for a family member on my property, that I own in full? I earned that. They need to approve or deny it, then tax you on your costs.
That, is excessive government control. And we look right past it, accept it. I don't think government would need near as much money from us, if they weren't sticking their nose where is doesn't belong or need to be. Feds put an end to an amish man selling unpasteurized milk. Shouldn't it be our choice if we want natural foods or not? Where does the government draw the line in interfering with our lives? Most of my family in America have been farmers in the past. If it weren't for growing their own food, and working hard, WE may not have been here today. Not sure if this link will be clickable
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/apr/...
You're really not worth arguing with anymore. I can think of a myriad of reasons when you'd cry like a bitch for the government to do something to save you. You only want NO government intervention when it benefits you. Suppose a big corporation bought the land adjacent to your family dairy farm and decided that would be the perfect place for a toxic waste dump? SO they put up a 20 foot fence and started dumping every type of foul, poison right on the ground. I'm positive you wouldn't be so in favor laissez faire government policies then.

Yes, I believe 'you', personally or party, are by policy if not practice anti-women, anti-minority, anti-equality. The extreme right is the party of the old, rich , white male. Period. All others are subservient and treated as such. It actually physically sickens me to watch some of the buffoons they parade out on Fox talk down to me as if they're somehow superior. In what way? Because their great granddad was successful? They and their policies are on the wrong side of both history and demographics. As much as YOU wish it was 1906, it's NOT. And it's not going back either. Without MAJOR changes in players and policy, the Republican party will become more and more polarizing and irreverent. It's identical to the anti-Marijuana madness. Every old white male that dies further weakens support for those old, failed policies. Young people don't believe the lies anymore. I'm not a minority lover and have NEVER felt they deserved preferential treatment. I have however met many that I would much rather associate with that some 'whites'. I will not answer or reply to anything else you say, no matter how asinine. Enjoy your country while I continue to ruin it on you.
jadksn

Owensboro, KY

#142 Jan 27, 2013
big package wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah man!!! You're exactly right... Obama's death team targets Muslim children for drone assassinations. Please close your ignorant mouth hole.
Personal freedoms huh? So YOU should be able to decide what you put into YOUR body, but God damn don't ever let one of dem womens think about getting an abortion? We're gonna make that illegal right? Maybe we should beat them too, just so they know how serious you are. SO totally typical. YOU want all the freedom in the world. 100%, unequivocal, but don't dare let anyone else ask for the same consideration.
Our drone strikes aren't as surgical as you think.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/15340/drone...
Some studies say that for every 50 citizens killed by our "surgical strikes" one actual combatant is killed in Pakistan. That's tyranny.

And I don't know why you think that opposing a tyrant automatically makes me a woman hating, homosexual beating, minority hating republican. I believe in freedom and liberty, something neither candidate were willing to give me. Women should have the right to terminate unwanted pregnancies for whatever reason. Just as I should have the right to ingest anything I desire. Common sense.
jadksn

Owensboro, KY

#143 Jan 27, 2013
big package wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah and if you were forced to use ACTUAL facts, you'd have NO argument at all. Who told you we're arming extremists in Syria? I think I MIGHT know a bit more about what's going on there right now than you do? You have some contact in the NSA I don't know about? Sister in the Special Forces?
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/01/us/syria-rebels...
Here you go. ACTUAL facts.
You'd know this elementary stuff about your own country if you had the patience to read every once in awhile.

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Tucker, GA

#144 Jan 27, 2013
big package wrote:
<quoted text>You're really not worth arguing with anymore. I can think of a myriad of reasons when you'd cry like a bitch for the government to do something to save you. You only want NO government intervention when it benefits you. Suppose a big corporation bought the land adjacent to your family dairy farm and decided that would be the perfect place for a toxic waste dump? SO they put up a 20 foot fence and started dumping every type of foul, poison right on the ground. I'm positive you wouldn't be so in favor laissez faire government policies then.

Yes, I believe 'you', personally or party, are by policy if not practice anti-women, anti-minority, anti-equality. The extreme right is the party of the old, rich , white male. Period. All others are subservient and treated as such. It actually physically sickens me to watch some of the buffoons they parade out on Fox talk down to me as if they're somehow superior. In what way? Because their great granddad was successful? They and their policies are on the wrong side of both history and demographics. As much as YOU wish it was 1906, it's NOT. And it's not going back either. Without MAJOR changes in players and policy, the Republican party will become more and more polarizing and irreverent. It's identical to the anti-Marijuana madness. Every old white male that dies further weakens support for those old, failed policies. Young people don't believe the lies anymore. I'm not a minority lover and have NEVER felt they deserved preferential treatment. I have however met many that I would much rather associate with that some 'whites'. I will not answer or reply to anything else you say, no matter how asinine. Enjoy your country while I continue to ruin it on you.
Why do you keep bring race and sex into the conversation?

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Tucker, GA

#145 Jan 27, 2013
big package wrote:
<quoted text>You're really not worth arguing with anymore. I can think of a myriad of reasons when you'd cry like a bitch for the government to do something to save you. You only want NO government intervention when it benefits you. Suppose a big corporation bought the land adjacent to your family dairy farm and decided that would be the perfect place for a toxic waste dump? SO they put up a 20 foot fence and started dumping every type of foul, poison right on the ground. I'm positive you wouldn't be so in favor laissez faire government policies then.

Yes, I believe 'you', personally or party, are by policy if not practice anti-women, anti-minority, anti-equality. The extreme right is the party of the old, rich , white male. Period. All others are subservient and treated as such. It actually physically sickens me to watch some of the buffoons they parade out on Fox talk down to me as if they're somehow superior. In what way? Because their great granddad was successful? They and their policies are on the wrong side of both history and demographics. As much as YOU wish it was 1906, it's NOT. And it's not going back either. Without MAJOR changes in players and policy, the Republican party will become more and more polarizing and irreverent. It's identical to the anti-Marijuana madness. Every old white male that dies further weakens support for those old, failed policies. Young people don't believe the lies anymore. I'm not a minority lover and have NEVER felt they deserved preferential treatment. I have however met many that I would much rather associate with that some 'whites'. I will not answer or reply to anything else you say, no matter how asinine. Enjoy your country while I continue to ruin it on you.
This preconceived thought that you have of conservatives fearing minorities or women couldn't be any further off and just echoes the words of the far left and the media that wishes to group every conservative in the same category.
jadksn

Owensboro, KY

#146 Jan 27, 2013
TheRealOldSchool wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you keep bring race and sex into the conversation?
It's his only argument. Whenever you don't have facts to back up your position, just call the other person a sexist or a racist loud enough and you win.

“I'm almost awesome”

Level 5

Since: Dec 12

jersey city

#147 Jan 27, 2013
jadksn wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/01/us/syria-rebels...
Here you go. ACTUAL facts.
You'd know this elementary stuff about your own country if you had the patience to read every once in awhile.
That's what you're using as 'facts'? Some unnamed source in Washington? Hinting that Obama might have signed some secret directive? At some time in the past? Where is ONE verifiable fact?

You want some ACTUAL facts, with ACTUAL names and ACTUAL quotes heard on TV live by millions of people?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Women

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Owensboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Shell Gas Station on Frederica 4 min The REAL Teacher 5
What? No riots? 6 min The REAL Teacher 7
Are there any decent looking girls in OB 8 min The REAL Teacher 8
Independence Bank 31 min DongMan 10
find.. 46 min nickea 5
wife needs reality check 50 min YepYepYep 6
influenced wife. 51 min YepYepYep 6

Owensboro Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Owensboro Mortgages