1. I am going to assume that "hemp" is the cause of your rambling post.<quoted text> ... We wouldn't have to drill one more well in 10 years if we put hemp back into production. And your man is opposed to it. Yet he supports solar and wind that has been proven to not be cost affective. Remember when they said putting robots to use will lower the cost. What happened? Cost went up and people lost there jobs....
2. Solar and wind power have been proved to be cost effective.
3. Robots in fact did lower the cost of production, particularly personnel costs.
I suggest that you attempt to be allowed to join an agricultural society, such as the Amish, although I doubt that you would be welcomed.