First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Oh My

Florissant, MO

#41 Mar 19, 2013
Readplease wrote:
<quoted text> Did you read the heading of this forum? N-e-p-o-t-i-s-m. Does that help? Make sure you keep your scared self home on election day please. I for one would really have a great day if you told me you don't vote because it's a waste of time. In closing... Got fu@k yourself.
Another whiner who thinks he can control people by demonstrating his knowledge of obscenities, abusive comments and inane ramblings.

How pathetic!

United States

#42 Mar 19, 2013
Thomas T wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? So someone makes a post referring to "Keith" and there are no posts with the name "Keith" as a heading but we are suppose to know who it is referring to. Why? Is the council president the only person in society named Keith? It would seem logical that anyone wishing to identify someone would use their Christian and their surname and/or position instead of just assuming everyone knew who they were referring to.
Still all that has been said here is accusations. No proof that the job was awarded before it was listed. No proof that the person getting the job is unqualified, No proof about any of the allledged improprieties. So, as has been said people resort to name calling when they cannot back up their allegations.
All you need do is show the documentation to validate your claims. Should be easy enough. Of course if you can't, if all you are capable of doing is resorting to school yard comments it is reasonable to assume you have nothing to verify your gripes.
Thomas T. you are obviously new to Topix. Calling someone out by their full name (especially in a negative manner) gives them the right to report ABUSE subsequently getting those comments removed. If you pay attention take notes and watch the Council meetings, this dialogue would be much easier for you to follow. Of course unless you are really that naÔve or you are attempting to covering up the truth. I bet you are much smarter and are very close to these situations.
another employee

Saint Louis, MO

#43 Apr 19, 2013
Except for item #8 the employee was correct on all counts. It would be easy to prove each item if employees were not afraid of being fired. The H R Director has no qualifications to be the HR Director. You have ranked police officers who should not be ranked according to their own regulations and qualifications. Can these be verified- no because you cannot see their applications for the positions since it is against the law to do so without their permission. If you were not qualified would you want to show qualifications. Concerning the next election if it were a 2 person race the present Mayor would lose. It was pointed out there were more votes against him ( his opponents ) than for him in the last election and he has ticked off alot of people since then.

Florissant, MO

#44 Apr 23, 2013
The only reason #8 became untrue was because the mayor seen THIS topic discussion. Soon after March 8 he changed his opinion and started to discuss with in house directors as to the personís qualifications. In other words the cat was let out of the bag. The mayor and his personal staff monitor Topix. The last thing he wants is his name/position negatively published in the press. He cannot handle that stress. As far as the employees of the city no one would dare divulge who they are on this discussion for fear of retaliation by the mayor. Just look at his past vindictive history. He has an obsessed temper of which he cannot control. When he chooses not to do something like the council special meeting April 15 to discuss the budget he ordered staff to not attend which included him. So how can the council do anything productive without accurate or any information provided? This mayor is a child who is unapproachable and lacks any positive personality. He is afraid to make a decision in fear of looking bad. He is nowhere near a leader and is a terrible manager. He does not know how to speak or discuss issues with his directorís staff or employees. Plain and simple he is weak. He does know how to portray been a big shot authority around his peers. Get into a private discussion with some of the surrounding mayorís such as Black Jack and Ferguson. Ask a question about our mayor and you shall receive a nonverbal response BUT their facial expression will speak volumes. The voters need to get rid of this guy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Overland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Threat Fulfilled?: Farrakhan Said 'We'll Tear T... 5 min dirtclod 4
Obama: Racism, bias in US will take time to tackle 50 min The Failed President 318
Body cameras for cops could be the biggest chan... 56 min Police Crimes 1,505
Michael Brown is NO hero. 1 hr EDDIE 32
Powerful Photos Blast The Media's Portrayal Of ... 3 hr Skorzeny 435
Now cops can start capping a black 3 hr Al azz Sharpton 1
All Politics Is Racial: The tiny north-county h... (May '14) May '14 Jim OMalley 1
Overland Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Overland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Overland News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Overland

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:46 pm PST

Yahoo! Sports 4:46PM
Rookie Beckham leads Giants past Rams 37-27
Bleacher Report 6:10 PM
New York Giants vs. St. Louis Rams: Full Report Card Grades for St. Louis
NBC Sports 6:42 PM
St. Louis Rams lose 37-27 to Giants at home - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 7:22 PM
Giants Show Resiliency, Maturity in Win
Bleacher Report 7:49 PM
How Far Can Steelers' Big Three Carry Them?