Little-known law aids bat-bite victim | The Columbus Dispatch
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Columbus Dispatch.
#1 Jan 15, 2010
yeahh for bat laws!! now what can we do about morons driving with cell phones??
#2 Feb 13, 2010
Now, I don't want to get off on a rant here, but given our scant attention to
victims' rights, sometimes they're better off if the criminal is never caught
in the first place. At least that way they only get fucked around once.
Maybe the problem is, we're a culture already saturated with victimization.
We're all so loud, shrill, and adept at playing the victim in inconsequential
situations that an actual bonafide victim stands about as much a chance of
being noticed as an unemployed guy with a laptop and a goatee at a Starbucks.
The sheer volume of cases presently deluging the courts pretty much guarantees
that no matter how heinous the crime, its victims are faceless entities, mere
numbers on a court docket who are accorded all the dignity of a ring girl at a
The entire legal system is bent on ensuring the rights of the accused. Victims
couldn't wield any less power if they were the California electrical grid. The
disparity between the victim's and the criminal's rights is most obvious when
it comes to representation. Criminals who can't afford a lawyer get one
appointed to them by the court, while victims who cant afford one are relegated
to hiring the cycloptic paralegal who advertises during "Mama's Family."
In order to avoid creating vigilantes, society takes the right of retribution
for a crime away from the victim and makes it a matter for "the people." Of
course, in America this means the solemn burden of justice is in the hands of
the same "people" who created the Chia Pet, order the "Backyard Wrestling"
tapes, and have demanded 7 distinct flavors of Corn-Nuts.
Come on, there's gotta be a way to protect the rights of victims as well as the
accused. For example, victims should have a right to know when the animal who
attacked them is going to get out of jail. They shouldn't have to read about it
in the papers, or find out their assailant took tax-payer-financed computer
courses in prison and has just been hired as their boss.
And how about white collar criminals who bilk people out of their life savings
and are then given a slap on the wrist-sentenced to house arrest? The solution
is simple: Sentence them to house arrest in their victim's house. Trust me,
they'll be beggin' for prison.
#3 Feb 13, 2010
As for paying restitution... Well, many criminals don't have any money. What
they do have is unlimited time and limited space. I think they should have to
spend their entire sentence pedaling a stationary bike in their cell that
generates electricity and sends it to the homes of their victims. Take a big
chunk out of those monthly utility bills.
And I can't believe that there is any argument against rules requiring
convicted child molesters to announce their presence in neighborhoods. Hey,
fuck that. I think they should have to wear bells on their shoes and a bright
yellow windbreaker that says, "I am a convicted child molester" on the back.
But I do have a solution that should make everybody happy: Let's force paroled
child molesters to live in the same neighborhoods where all the ACLU attorneys
In the case of physical assault, the victim should have the right to choose his
assailant's cellmate. If done properly, this one easy step could serve the dual
purpose of making the victim feel empowered, and the criminal feel victimized.
Or, at the very least, sore.
In our increasingly vengeful society, guaranteeing crime victims their rights
is not just desirable. It's essential. It channels that need for vengeance away
from chaos and into socially acceptable expression. But if we continue to push
victims around, they may one day feel as if they have no choice but to take
back their rights in the only way they've seen work: by becoming defendants
Yes, we are all innocent until proven guilty, but when a self-confessed monster
like Timothy McVeigh can stall his execution because of a few misplaced boxes
of documents that only show how much more guilty he is, we need to hustle his
ass up onto that gurney faster than the time it will take for his scumbag
lawyers to sign their upcoming book deal.
I endorse the execution of McVeigh. But every now and then I feel a pang of
guilt, thinking, "Could he suffer more?" In my fantasy, we get a Port-A-John
that's brimming with shit, lock him in it, and put the whole thing on a pickup
truck driving slowly cross-country on badly paved roads.
Some anti-death penalty advocates say that McVeigh's execution won't bring
closure to the survivors of the bombing. Maybe not, but it will bring closure
to McVeigh's eyes, and frankly, that's all I need right now.
Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
#4 Feb 13, 2010
Add your comments below
|Delaware Gazette newspapter||Jan 4||Intrigued||1|
|Tonya Barton (Nov '15)||Jan 2||Tobias Kitchen||9|
|Neighbors Names of Flemings||Dec 31||Quite the sad story||1|
|Some central Ohioans fear for relatives left in...||Dec 31||Oliver Cantterberry||4|
|Ohio colleges, universities: Protect immigrant ...||Dec 23||They cannot kill ...||16|
|Delaware General Health District - Obesity||Dec 19||tubby tobey||4|
|Brian Barnes Co. Inc is Incompetent and is dish... (Nov '13)||Dec 18||Truth about Barnes||3|
Find what you want!
Search Ostrander Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC