You said my commentary about marriage was all opinion.<quoted text>I already gave you one. The fact it can be argued MLK would be for gay marriage given by the feedback of his widow but you did not answer to it. I still don't really know your stance given you gave two separate views on that subject and have yet to clarify which side of the fence you are on.
Your labeling of gay couples as being "mutually sterile" is your opinion as well apparently. No facts. Just opinion.
The idea a heterosexual union in terms of marriage being "miraculous" is no more than a statement of opinion. I would think a miracle would be someone shedding themselves of terminal cancer and living to 99 but if you want to hold an opinion that all heterosexual marriages are 'miraculous' by all means do so but stop being so ignorant as to think the reflects any factual information.
We could go on. You don't have facts to bolster your opinions so therefore they remain as just that - opinions.
Now here's a fact. Thousands of gays have been married. An increasing number of states are allowing gays to marry year by year.
Now you are back tracking.
Can't back up your opinion?