Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201480 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202929 Jul 16, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
There seem to be 4 camps
Those that want it for religious reasons
Those that want it for a way to collect extra government support checks
Those that want it as an excuse to molest children
Those that could care less about it but bring it up on forums that are about same sex marriage as a diversion.
None of those 4 reasons bode well for the idea, when folks get past those 4 reasons, then something might happen, but as long as those are the 4 camps, it will go nowhere.
The same stuff the bigots used against SSM. Different form of marriage, same (really worse) bigoted ad hominem attacks. I'm real proud of you bigot!(and hypocrite).
Poof

Madison, WI

#202930 Jul 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Religion has no place in a discussion of marriage equality Jizzy. Get your mind off of that. Take it to the fundie threads.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/06/on-what-...
http://www.gaypolygamist.com/
During the first fights over same sex marriage, the bible and religion where used as a way of denying marriage to gays and lesbians. In this nation we don't make laws based on religion. If the people whom want polygamy are doing so based on religion, the answer is no. Just as it was for denying same sex marriage. It works both ways. The question of polygamy was answered long ago.

Research Service 2
Christianity.6 These bodies of religious law may play as relevant a role in certain legal actions as
sharia might play in others.
In the United States, these religious laws have no legally binding effect on U.S. citizens because
religious laws cannot be adopted by federal, state, or local governments under the First
Amendment. Rather, individuals who identify with a particular religious group may voluntarily
subject themselves to such religious laws by their association with the community.7 For example,
if a particular religious sect or denomination requires its members to dress modestly, and an
individual who is a member of that particular group does not comply with the dress code, that
individual would be in violation of that groupís religious law. The individualís belief in the
religionís precepts would guide his or her individual actions, with any sanction for noncompliance
generally remaining a private matter between the individual and the religious group.
The individual would not be subject to any penalty by the government because the government
does not enforce such a dress code. Interestingly, this distinction between religious and secular
laws can become complicated when an action might be governed by both religious law and
secular law. For example, many religious denominationsí beliefs prohibit murder under their
religious code. Both federal and state laws also prohibit murder. Thus, an individual who
commits murder would be in violation of both a religious law and a secular law and may be
sanctioned by the religious group, the government, or both.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41824.pdf
Polyp Cam

Luton, UK

#202931 Jul 16, 2013
Joanie Rage Stain is covering the earth like Sherwin Williams!

Pull the trigger, Joanie. Turns out that Trayvon didn't accept you after all.
Poof

Madison, WI

#202932 Jul 16, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
There seem to be 4 camps
Those that want it for religious reasons
Those that want it for a way to collect extra government support checks
Those that want it as an excuse to molest children
Those that could care less about it but bring it up on forums that are about same sex marriage as a diversion.
None of those 4 reasons bode well for the idea, when folks get past those 4 reasons, then something might happen, but as long as those are the 4 camps, it will go nowhere.
Religious reasons will not hold water

Welfare, that I can see, as I have found many examples of abuse.

Child abuse, see above statement. Muslims marry as young as 9 years of age. Warren Jeffs, 12 years of age.

The last, well dats our Frankie
Poof

Madison, WI

#202933 Jul 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
The same stuff the bigots used against SSM. Different form of marriage, same (really worse) bigoted ad hominem attacks. I'm real proud of you bigot!(and hypocrite).
Really? Can you find some examples of same sex marriage that meet the 4 reasons Big D listed?
Poof

Madison, WI

#202934 Jul 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not allowed to have a registered profile. I'm not as equal as you are. That's why icehole.
Good that you asked though. Remember! There are no stupid posts. Only stupid dumbass moronic posters like yourself.
ROFLMAO, Frankie are you a 3rd class asshat???

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#202935 Jul 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I said nothing about how it is accomplished,
Actually you did. You said it required a heterosexual couple. Do you need the post number again where you made that stupid claim? Why must you lie so if your cause is so just?!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
but you have no children without female.
No? Really?!!!! OMGosh everyone, did you all know that a female is required in order for childbirth to occur? Quick, someone needs to get this information into the news!!!! Hurry!!! This is very important!!!!!

You also can't have a c*nt without a female. Thank you for demonstrating that so effectively with your ineffective and childish condescension.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
However you staged it, you have deprived two children of a parent and a gender model for your fantasy at their detriment.
Wow! Now there's some made up fantasy!! Sorry bitch, but I'll take my children's word on the matter of that of a bitter cur like yourself! Smile.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I make it my business to protect children.
LOL!! No dear, you make it your business to lie, spread gossip, initiate discord and be a busy bodied bitch. There's quite a difference between that and protecting children from imaginary scenarios that you make up in your anal sex obsessed head.

My children neither need, nor want, your "protection". Neither do any other children of decent families.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What you did was diabolically criminal.
And yet I'm not behind bars, I've not been committed of anything criminal, my children are both great, and your still a bitter c*nt!

Smile.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I just read about a child calling one of his two 'daddies' mom in a heartbreaking attempt to fill a void.
I just read that you completely make shyt up. Share this with the sheeple dear, no one else is buying your bullshyt.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For the sake of your child, wake up before its too late!
LOL!!! You get more pathetic everyday. if they had a contest for the most cowardly loser on Topix it would come down to you and Brian_G. You reek of desperation and skank.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#202936 Jul 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! An arbitrary judgement of 'wrong'. That the defense of a mature person...
Sorry queen, at this point, my points stand.
Based on your reasoning, the government has removed children in all homes they are at risk in. Really
As to the studies used to excuse depriving a child of one parent gender and placing them in the riskiest default setting, they are the ones debunked as deceptive and unscientific. The one gays slander has been vindicated. Moreover, it simply validates what countless studies have validated for default families.
Example: Children in a home absent a father are FIVE times more likely to get in trouble with the law. You suggest being a lesbian eradicates that danger. The claim would be hilariously stupid if the victim wasn't a child.
You base your opinion on deceitful ignorant bigotry.
I think you make my point for me in your sentences, "Based on your reasoning, the government has removed children in all homes they are at risk in. Really" and "Children in a home absent a father are FIVE times more likely to get in trouble with the law."

Children are allowed to be raised in homes that may not fit what YOU, personally, believe are inappropriate for them.

Courts and jurisdictions have determined that in spite of these "studies", they cannot be used as blanket indicators for how a child will turn out--what kind of home life he or she will experience.

Tens of thousands of LGBT people provide excellent homes for kids. Just as millions of homes headed by straight people provide horrific places to raise children.

Your statistics and studies are basically worthless when it comes to the real world.

Courts, lawmakers, human service agencies, and private adoption firms evaluate the appropriateness of parents and homes on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

You spew stupidity each time you come here. You deal in abstracts and not reality.

Good luck with that...
laughing man

Luton, UK

#202938 Jul 16, 2013
Polyp Cam wrote:
Joanie Rage Stain is covering the earth like Sherwin Williams!
Pull the trigger, Joanie. Turns out that Trayvon didn't accept you after all.
19 minutes and only ONE frikin' measly little negative smilie?

Is The Stain© on life support?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202939 Jul 16, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO, Frankie are you a 3rd class asshat???
According to a master asshat like you, yes. I am third class. But according to any other standards, I'm not an asshat at all.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#202940 Jul 16, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait for it. This is the bigot's way of setting up a completely mis-representation of what was previous stated. Another example of this tired fundie routine is, "so what you are really saying...".
This allows the fundie to then go off on a tirade based upon something that they made up rather than what was actually stated.
<quoted text>
Actually anyone with half an IQ would realize that it would have to be "of my spouse". The fact that you are confused and think it could be either "me" or "him" shows how ridiculously stupid you are.
<quoted text>
If she was a surrogate, it wasn't her child now was it pumpkin? Honestly, don't you get tired of showing off how stupid you are?
<quoted text>
No dear, we're a full family. Not a damn thing you can do about it. Well, other than childishly post like you are doing. Your pathetic attempts to goad demonstrate your true character. You're a complete c*nt who doesn't mind showing off that fact.
Smile dear.
<quoted text>
I'm sure the children already understand, since they were told and are now practically adults. But please, don't let facts get in the way of continuing your sanctimonious condescension! Watching fundamentalist Christians show off how truly vile they are makes me giddy!!
<quoted text>
Well, being the busy bodied fundie that you are, you do tend to find the stupidest things to be interesting. It's like watching a turkey get excited over something shiny.
<quoted text>
No hon, I realize that c*nts like yourself find it reprehensible. I don't concern myself with what c*nts think.
But thank you hon, for demonstrating to anyone reading this thread what vile people fundamentalist Christians are. Bigots for Jesus!! Smile be-atch!
You know, Kimare pretended to be a preacher for many years. But I have never seen him represent Christianity in the 3 or so years I've observed his posts.

He has done everything in his power to create hatred and fear of God's children--His creation.

Don't get into a pissing contest with a skunk. There is no winning. It's better to just walk away and let him piss himself.

I know a little about his history. You have a better life than Kimare will EVER have.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202941 Jul 16, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>During the first fights over same sex marriage, the bible and religion where used as a way of denying marriage to gays and lesbians. In this nation we don't make laws based on religion. If the people whom want polygamy are doing so based on religion, the answer is no. Just as it was for denying same sex marriage. It works both ways. The question of polygamy was answered long ago.
Research Service 2
Christianity.6 These bodies of religious law may play as relevant a role in certain legal actions as
sharia might play in others.
In the United States, these religious laws have no legally binding effect on U.S. citizens because
religious laws cannot be adopted by federal, state, or local governments under the First
Amendment. Rather, individuals who identify with a particular religious group may voluntarily
subject themselves to such religious laws by their association with the community.7 For example,
if a particular religious sect or denomination requires its members to dress modestly, and an
individual who is a member of that particular group does not comply with the dress code, that
individual would be in violation of that groupís religious law. The individualís belief in the
religionís precepts would guide his or her individual actions, with any sanction for noncompliance
generally remaining a private matter between the individual and the religious group.
The individual would not be subject to any penalty by the government because the government
does not enforce such a dress code. Interestingly, this distinction between religious and secular
laws can become complicated when an action might be governed by both religious law and
secular law. For example, many religious denominationsí beliefs prohibit murder under their
religious code. Both federal and state laws also prohibit murder. Thus, an individual who
commits murder would be in violation of both a religious law and a secular law and may be
sanctioned by the religious group, the government, or both.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41824.pdf
Take it to the fundie threads, fundie.

What reason do you have to deny three consenting atheist women marriage?

Religion has little relevance in a discussion of marriage equality, Jizzy, remember? Duh.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202942 Jul 16, 2013
Polyp Cam wrote:
Joanie Rage Stain is covering the earth like Sherwin Williams!
Pull the trigger, Joanie. Turns out that Trayvon didn't accept you after all.
Trayvon would have beat on Jonah1 just as surely as he did on any other crazyass cracka.

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#202943 Jul 16, 2013
There was a ban ?!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202944 Jul 16, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious reasons will not hold water
Welfare, that I can see, as I have found many examples of abuse.
Child abuse, see above statement. Muslims marry as young as 9 years of age. Warren Jeffs, 12 years of age.
The last, well dats our Frankie
You are forgetting about equality.

There are perfectly good laws on the books for all the crimes you ignorantly fear about polygamy. Prosecute the crime, not the criminal's marriage. Do we prosecute a same sex marriage if one of it's members commits a crime?

The reason you perceive welfare abuse is the fault of polygamy being illegal, not polygamy itself. Only one wife is allowed, any others are considered single mothers by the government, thus entitled to welfare. It's the government that creates the problem you whine about. Take it up with them.

When we are talking about marriage it's understood I am talking about adults and not children marrying, OK Jizzy? Just like I don't criticize a same sex marriage for any crimes against children, you shouldn't do it to polygamy. Equality. Remember?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#202945 Jul 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I make it my business to protect children.
LOL!!! You know who else makes it their business to protect children you old biddy?

American Academy of Pediatrics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
American Psychoanalytic Association
National Association of Social Workers
Child Welfare League of America
North American Council on Adoptable Children
Canadian Psychological Association

These EXPERTS all agree that children raised by sexual minority parents with those raised by otherwise comparable heterosexual parents have not found any differences in mental health or social adjustment.

These EXPERTS have stated that differences have not been found in parenting ability between lesbian mothers and heterosexual mothers.

These EXPERTS have stated that gay fathers are fewer in number but aren't any less fit or able as parents than heterosexual men.

So lets see. We have the actual peer reviewed research and testimonials from ten organizations specializing in the health and welfare of children, or we have the made up bunk of a fundamentalist Christian c*nt who has proven repeatedly to be intentionally deceitful, a liar, and a sanctimonious bitch. I wonder which side is right??!!!!!

Smile cur.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202946 Jul 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo1 wrote:
<quoted text>Don't make me report you. Stop using MY Name. Even the bums on 42 2nd street don't get away with that crap. Try selling oranges I bet you can make twenty bucks a day doing it. That buys a lot of crappy wine. Now get a job you dead beat, and stop sucking the teat of the Government.
Where did you get the oranges? Bet you stole them.

Don't need to work sonny. No need to worry about me, I'm more than fine in that regard. Made something of my life when I was young and able. Enjoying the riches now. Speaking of making money. get off Topix and GET A JOB you MOOCHER!
Enrico Salvatore Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202947 Jul 16, 2013
I know where Jizzy's been. 42nd Street. That's where he's been.
Enrico Salvatore Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202949 Jul 16, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>ROFLMAO, Frankie are you a 3rd class asshat???
You know, with proper management, you could be takin' home fifty, maybe a hundred dollars a day, easy.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202952 Jul 16, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!!!
YUK!YUK!YUK! HAR!HAR!HAR! So funny!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bags dumped beside Palermo road hold waste from... (Apr '09) May 13 Rhino 10
News Six teens arrested for homicide, robbery in hom... (Feb '10) May 6 Robert 80
Sheriff`s Race In Yuba County Apr '18 Roudy 1
News Two wounded in shooting at south side of OrovilleA (May '09) Apr '18 Mechelle williams 13
Anyone see Marvin Markle lose his sh*t yesterday? (Feb '12) Mar '18 myopinion 101
News PG&E plans low-level flights this week over But... Mar '18 Mann Avenue 1
News Egbert convicted of second-degree murder (Oct '08) Mar '18 a disgusted class... 8

Oroville Jobs

Personal Finance

Oroville Mortgages