Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#201347 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. When it comes to Christians they all sound alike to me.
To me, they all sound the same anymore, regardless of which religion, naked natives dancing around a campfire chanting "Hooga Booga Hooga Booga"
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#201352 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The only joy that KiMare has in his life is harassing homosexuals, it defines his whole entire life. Isn't that pathetic? You think he would want to go out on a date or have some fun, but no, all he can do is sit there all day, every day and think of ways to be mean.
Words like please do not have an effect on KiMare because he is both morally bankrupt and divorced from reality.
isn't that what happens when viagra doesn't work?

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#201355 Jul 10, 2013
CaptainMorgan2015 wrote:
<quoted text>I have often wondered why god, being god would give two shats about us, having sex. Kinda lame if you ask me. Seems like god should be thinking about the next flood or different ways to fluck with us.
It is impossible to make sense out of anything having to do with Christianty; the Christians themselves and their Bible.

For Instance:

Jesus is God:

•(a) "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30);
•(b) "...he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 17:22);
•(c) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God" (John 1"1).

Jesus is NOT God:
•(a) "Why callest me good? There is none good but one, that is God" Matt. 19:17);
•(b) "for my Father is greater than I" (John 14:28);
•(c) "My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me" (John 7:16);
•(d) "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matt. 27:46);
•(e) "Who has gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God" (1 Peter 3:22);

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#201357 Jul 10, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Do you really want someone to sit here and explain each passage you posted? I busted you before for posting a verse and it was actually about you, remember the one about "fools"?
TRANSLATION: I have nothing to deal with any of the contradiction Reverend Alan posted, and I am too much of a hypocrite to admit to this truth, so I'll pretend I have answers but not enough time to post them. Then I will claim I did it before and maybe someone will believe me. Please some one believe me, someone has to believe me.

Translation provided by His Holiness Reverend Alan.

Drink the Draino RicardoFire.
Brucie the gay peacock

Luton, UK

#201358 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
It is impossible to make sense out of anything having to do with Christianty; the Christians themselves and their Bible.
For Instance:
Jesus is God:
•(a) "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30);
•(b) "...he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 17:22);
•(c) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God" (John 1"1).
Jesus is NOT God:
•(a) "Why callest me good? There is none good but one, that is God" Matt. 19:17);
•(b) "for my Father is greater than I" (John 14:28);
•(c) "My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me" (John 7:16);
•(d) "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matt. 27:46);
•(e) "Who has gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God" (1 Peter 3:22);
A shit cultist lectures people about surrealism.

You can't make this stuff up.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#201359 Jul 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. The gay twirl bombastic pontificater is offended because truth and reality can be concisely described with one word.
That's what frustrated People in denial. All their delusion is eposed with a simple description of reality.
At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint in evolutionary mating behavior.
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Children prefer mom and dad.
You need more than therapy. You need God.
That's another simple reality.
You seem to be under the delusional impression that repetition magically creates truth. It doesn't.
Fearless Contrarian

Saint Paul, MN

#201360 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. When it comes to Christians they all sound alike to me.
Would Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. have supported the LGBTQ -rights movement?

Today’s prominent gay rights activists compare the marriage equality struggle with the American civil rights racial equality movement of the mid-twentieth century. But would the most revered American icon of the early civil rights movement, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. have supported a massive push to redefine marriage?

While, it’s impossible to know for sure what side of the fence Martin Luther King would have been on, as an ordained Christian Baptist minister with a doctorate in theology, and former president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, it stands to reason that King would have championed the word of God.

The Judeo-Christian beliefs and principles that inspired and spurred Martin Luther King, Jr. to heroic feats, valor, and selfless sacrifice are now looked upon with derision, and disdain by the very same people who paradoxically honor him on the third Monday of January, and in significant places such as the monumental memorial in Washington, D.C.

In 1964, Martin Luther King, Jr. was asked in “Face the Nation,” whether his organization had ties to communist elements. His response was as follows,“communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism...that I could never accept." (see link below)

King’s uncompromising rejection of “ethical relativism” provides compelling reason to believe he would not have supported a form of marriage that violates God’s will. Now whether King would have taken an active stance against non-traditional marriage is another question.

If King would have actively opposed it, he most likely would have urged his Christian brethren to promote morality, spiritual truth, and religious freedom through courageous and peaceful protest.

Had this beloved American hero lived to see his dream realized, he would have been grateful to God for the significant strides we- as a nation- have made to end racial bigotry, yet appalled by the intense religious bigotry that plagues our country.

Source: <
>

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#201361 Jul 10, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
isn't that what happens when viagra doesn't work?
I just found out that KiMare is a female so that explains why the viagra isn't working, it is her husband who is supposed to be taking it. Can you imagine how stupid she must have felt returning the viagra to the pharmacy and the pharmacist having to explain to her that it is her husband who is supposed to take it not her.

Now if we can get the pharmacist to explain anal sex to her, her husband is supposed to use his dick not his head.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#201363 Jul 10, 2013
CaptainMorgan2015 wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude if Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Don't have it, simple.
What an idiotic gay twirl talking point.

Nothing original you could come up with?

Natural sex is healthy. Gay sex is a harmful, abusive imitation. Clear evidence why SS couples are not the same as marriage.

Just a heads up; marriage has a choice, SS couples don't.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#201364 Jul 10, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
No Joanah, I don't beieve in "Fairy" tales either. What I do believe in is a good wholesome moral society, like before the homo came out of the closet and infected our nation with deadly disease and a very queer and twisted lifestyle.
Homosexuality has as much to do with morality as the moon has to do with starting a car.

Honestly, don't you get tired of publically demonstrating how ridiculously stupid you are Penguin Boy?
Pietro Armando

Schenectady, NY

#201365 Jul 10, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears you have read the bible! I'm real proud of you fruitcake! Real proud.
It was a coloring book style Bible. But he did color, all the colors of the rainbow flag, inside the lines.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#201367 Jul 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
One idiotic, angry gay twirled lie after another.
TRANSLATION: I'm incapable of addressing the individual issues because I made them all up and have nothing to support them.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The highest purpose of marriage is a healthy safe place to raise biological children.
That's your opinion. Most people don't agree with it.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The primary rights and privileges were originally established for mothers and children.
LOL!! The primary rights and privileges were originally established for the men dear. Women were property, not equal participants. You might want to read a little more on the "origin", or at least learn how to use that word properly.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not for two grown men like you and your partner to use and abuse.[/QUOTE}
My husband and I haven't abused anything. We entered into marriage, which, just so you know, has no mandate for the production of a biological child.

[QUOTE who="KiMare"]<quo ted text>
Man up!
That's hilarious coming from you c*nt.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Another statement only a gay would make. Any sane, compassionate person knows children prefer mom and dad.
No dear, only stupid people who hate gay people would have this completely unsupported notion. That's why you can't present any substantial number of children, out of the hundreds of thousands currently available, that are being raised by gay parents that would support your accusation.

Like most of the things you state, you simply made it up.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The rest is too stupid to waste time with.
'
TRANSLATION: I'm incapable of addressing the individual issues because I made them all up and have nothing to support them.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#201368 Jul 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry sonny, no hate, no bigotry, not even any religion. Just simple truth and reality.
Did you keep a straight face while you typed that? I know I sure couldn't keep a straight face when I read it!! What a load of horse shyt! Five lies in such a small amount of space. Wow!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
SS couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage. A sexual defective failure of mating behavior.
Oh, back to the fundie bumper stickers I see. Hey, here's a reminder for you. Mutually sterility is irrelevant to marriage since mutual procreation isn't a requirement. Never has been, never will be. Oh, and procreation isn't a required outcome of f*cking, or mating behavior as you call it. So your defect is imaginary. Just like all your other talking points.

smile bitch.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I set those facts in front of you to deliver you from deadly denial.
You've presented absolutely no facts. You've simply expressed your unfounded opinions and spouted some outright lies.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That is why you scream and squeal like a demon being cast out.
Now, what was that you said in your first sentence about not being religious?!! Geez! "DEMONS BEING CAST OUT"!!! LOL!! That's funny. One can only imagine you believe in such claptrap.

Dear, nothing you say would cause me to scream or squeal. You are really quite insignificant. The only emotional response I have to you is giddiness. Exposing you for the lying, intentionally deceitful, vile hearted c*nt that you are is quite a hoot!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#201369 Jul 10, 2013
CaptainMorgan2015 wrote:
<quoted text> Oh well, religion is dying off.
And it is past time it did, took long enough.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#201370 Jul 10, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
But but, you said God doesn't exist. Do you often wonder about the motivations of something that doesn't exist Jiz?
I hope he is cancelled from his insurance next time he claims "act of god"

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#201372 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
TRANSLATION: I have nothing to deal with any of the contradiction Reverend Alan posted, and I am too much of a hypocrite to admit to this truth, so I'll pretend I have answers but not enough time to post them. Then I will claim I did it before and maybe someone will believe me. Please some one believe me, someone has to believe me.
Translation provided by His Holiness Reverend Alan.
Drink the Draino RicardoFire.
TRANSLATION: I really don't want to sit here and explain each passage you posted? I busted you before for posting a verse and it was actually about you, remember the one about "fools"?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#201374 Jul 10, 2013
CaptainMorgan2015 wrote:
<quoted text>Still falling back on "What about the kids". Look lady, having children has nothing to do with marriage. You don't have to have kids if you are married, and you don't have to be married to have kids. Simple.
The sad thing is not how idiotic your gay claim is, it is the fact that you are willing to throw children under the bus to maintain your facade.

It's not simple, it's diabolical.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#201375 Jul 10, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
It is impossible to make sense out of anything having to do with Christianty; the Christians themselves and their Bible.
For Instance:
Jesus is God:
•(a) "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30);
•(b) "...he that hath seen me hath seen the Father" (John 17:22);
•(c) "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God" (John 1"1).
Jesus is NOT God:
•(a) "Why callest me good? There is none good but one, that is God" Matt. 19:17);
•(b) "for my Father is greater than I" (John 14:28);
•(c) "My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me" (John 7:16);
•(d) "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matt. 27:46);
•(e) "Who has gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God" (1 Peter 3:22);
Hey bro don't worry. Everyone, to varying degrees, struggles in trying to understand the Bible.
There are several factors that sometimes make the Bible hard to understand. First, there is a time and culture difference. Depending on what part of the Bible you are studying, there is between 3400 and 1900 years between when the Bible was written and us today.

Second, there is the fact that the Bible contains different types of literature. The Bible contains history, law, poetry, songs, wisdom literature, prophecy, personal letters, and apocalyptic literature. Historical literature must be interpreted differently from wisdom literature. Poetry cannot be understood in the same way as apocalyptic writings. A personal letter, while having meaning for us today, may not have the exact application to us as it did to the person(s) to whom it was written. Recognizing the fact that the Bible contains different genres is key in avoiding confusion and misunderstanding.

Trying to understand the Bible can sometimes be a difficult task, but with God’s help, it is possible.

Got any more questions I can help you with fake rev?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#201376 Jul 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Natural sex is healthy.
All sex is natural.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay sex is a harmful, abusive imitation.
There is no such thing as "gay sex". Why can't you defend your cause without making stuff up? It's very desperate.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Clear evidence why SS couples are not the same as marriage.
1) You need to look up the word "evidence". Your post makes it obvious you currently don't know how to use it properly.
2) No one has compared SS couples to marriage. No one. Why do you keep deceitfully pretending that someone has done this? If your cause is so just, why do you continue to lie? Marriage is an institution, it is not a comparison to people.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a heads up; marriage has a choice, SS couples don't.
Was that supposed to make sense? Marriage has a choice? Really? An institution is now capable of not only making choices, but also voicing them? What marriage has a choice? Who's marriage has made one of these choices? What if the participants in the marriage don't agree with the choice that the marriage made? Does the marriage consult with the participants or make these choices independently?

Don't forget to smile you ridiculous cur.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#201378 Jul 10, 2013
CaptainMorgan2015 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a heads up; marriage has a choice, SS couples don't.???
Lights on lights off???
Oral sex is unhealty?
Sucking on a sewer pipe is healthy?

Did you really just claim that????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man shot multiple times in Berry Creek a disputea (Dec '16) Jul 14 Rhino 4
News Homeless ousted from camp (Feb '09) Jul 10 TownWitch 93
FYI: Cali residents are entitled to payments wh... Jun '17 Chico Bandito 1
News Early-morning fire destroys Bucks Lake Lodge (Jan '10) Jun '17 Missey 24
News A a safea space to shoot up: Worth a try in Cal... Jun '17 Jane 1
News Pot grow raided in south Oroville (Sep '08) Jun '17 Shilo 178
BECAREFULL tenage GIRLS!!! in MARYSVILLE!!! (Jul '08) May '17 Williamsville 4

Oroville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oroville Mortgages