Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,179

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186723 Apr 5, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Common ground. You have your moments Big D. Grazie.
<quoted text>
But at what point, does it become pointless, from a societal/state/commonly understood meaning? If marriage is applied to ANY adult personal consensual intimate relationship, it loses its meaning....or perhaps becomes meaningless.
I donít see any point where someone else being able to marry will affect my marriage or what it means to me in any way whatsoever.

I donít feel the need to cross every bridge today, hence I am not actually very interested in all the slippery slope garbage, it is meaningless, so letís stick to the issue at hand Same Sex marriage.

There are in fact 18,000 legally married same sex couples in California right now, over 100,000 nationally ( donít know the actual exact number )

Those couples being able to devote their lives to one another has not in any way harmed my marriage, in fact my wife and I have talked about this, and we think that being inclusive has actually made us feel stronger about marriage in general.

I realize that mentally to you, it has made it weaker, but I donít see that, the issue is in your head, not in reality. Legally ( which is all I look to the government for ) it is no different than it was before.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#186724 Apr 5, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need to know what you do or are, that is not the point. You are free to be whatever. In my example Bono's girlfriend is not transgender, she went from Lesbian to straight without surgery. Some people go both ways, I don't care. Some go many ways, I don't care. Some like 3 or 4 ways, I don't care, but Marriage is between a man and a woman. You have civil relationships.
False gay marriage is legal in 11 states and growing.

Since: Mar 12

Milwaukee

#186725 Apr 5, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Why just 2? Brothers, sisters? where do u draw the line mr morals?
Incest really you went there? You are the ones saying its a man and a woman that's 2 right.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186726 Apr 5, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
Incest really you went there? You are the ones saying its a man and a woman that's 2 right.
That's right. And it's wrong.

Please clue Big D that prop 8 discriminates against poly marriage the same as it does against same sex marriage. Maybe he'll listen to you.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186727 Apr 5, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
Incest really you went there? You are the ones saying its a man and a woman that's 2 right.
When they go to the slippery slope arguments, you have won.

They can no longer bring any valid argument against same sex marriage so they are dipping into imaginary hypotheticals that are not at issue currently to try and scare people.

That only works with the ignorant, their constituency
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186728 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right. And it's wrong.
Please clue Big D that prop 8 discriminates against poly marriage the same as it does against same sex marriage. Maybe he'll listen to you.
Actually no it was the same level of illegal both before and after prop 8, zero effect.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#186729 Apr 5, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So a judge bought it......andddddddd....that means.....?
<quoted text>
Far easy to dismiss my point, than offer an opposing view.
well, since i actually agree with what was presented in court by educated, degreed and licensed attornies, anything i say would be redundant.

...and since a judge who's job it is to know the law and to interpret the law understands and accepts those arguments, that would put credibility and validity to the correlations made. kind of sad that has to be pointed out to you. if you don't accept those correlations, oh well. just your opinion - it just differs from the ones actually making decisions about the law.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186730 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually no it was the same level of illegal both before and after prop 8, zero effect.
If all the other laws against poly were repealed except prop 8, would polygamy be legal?

100% effect.

Prop 8 discriminates against polygamy the same as it does same sex marriage. You know, EQUALLY.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186731 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
When they go to the slippery slope arguments, you have won.
They can no longer bring any valid argument against same sex marriage so they are dipping into imaginary hypotheticals that are not at issue currently to try and scare people.
That only works with the ignorant, their constituency
http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/marriage.pdf
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186732 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If all the other laws against poly were repealed except prop 8, would polygamy be legal?
100% effect.
Prop 8 discriminates against polygamy the same as it does same sex marriage. You know, EQUALLY.
Go repeal all those laws and you will have a case, right now you have squat

Prop 8 has zero effect

Prop 8 had absolutely no effect whatsoever on something that was already illegal.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186733 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If all the other laws against poly were repealed except prop 8, would polygamy be legal?
100% effect.
Prop 8 discriminates against polygamy the same as it does same sex marriage. You know, EQUALLY.
If there was even a hint of a chance that those previous laws could be overturned before prop 8 is overturned it might be worth mentioning in passing, but as it stands... zero chance and not worth even refering to.

This argument will only work with the religious nut jobs that are frightened to death of the slippery slope arguments, nada for anyone else.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186734 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Go repeal all those laws and you will have a case, right now you have squat
Prop 8 has zero effect
Prop 8 had absolutely no effect whatsoever on something that was already illegal.
For the ...x time, I do not want to go out and (follow Big D orders). I simply want to fully explore marriage equality.

If the other laws against polygamy were repealed but Prop 8 was still in force, would polygamy be legal? No? Why not? Prop 8 has "zero effect" on polygamy, right?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186735 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
If there was even a hint of a chance that those previous laws could be overturned before prop 8 is overturned it might be worth mentioning in passing, but as it stands... zero chance and not worth even refering to.
This argument will only work with the religious nut jobs that are frightened to death of the slippery slope arguments, nada for anyone else.
I am not arguing against marriage equality, you are. I am arguing for it. Perhaps you are misunderstanding me, hence your frustration?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#186736 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít see any point where someone else being able to marry will affect my marriage or what it means to me in any way whatsoever.
So then there's no need to bar any consenting adults from entering in a marriage. Plural marriage won't affect you personally in anyway, nor will first cousins, or siblings.
I donít feel the need to cross every bridge today, hence I am not actually very interested in all the slippery slope garbage, it is meaningless, so letís stick to the issue at hand Same Sex marriage.
Its only meaningless because it steals some of the lime light from that sacred secular cow, SSM.

The Mighty Big D has spoken! He does not feel the need to cross that bridge.
There are in fact 18,000 legally married same sex couples in California right now, over 100,000 nationally ( donít know the actual exact number )
There are thousands of polygamists/plural marriage practitioners in the country too.
Those couples being able to devote their lives to one another has not in any way harmed my marriage, in fact my wife and I have talked about this, and we think that being inclusive has actually made us feel stronger about marriage in general.
does the Brown family make you feel stronger too.
I realize that mentally to you, it has made it weaker, but I donít see that, the issue is in your head, not in reality. Legally ( which is all I look to the government for ) it is no different than it was before.
We both know you failed to address the question. At what point does marriage as matter of public policy/common societal understanding and/or norm, become meaningless. Today its SSM, tomorrow poly, after that.....?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186737 Apr 5, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So then there's no need to bar any consenting adults from entering in a marriage. Plural marriage won't affect you personally in anyway, nor will first cousins, or siblings.
<quoted text>
Its only meaningless because it steals some of the lime light from that sacred secular cow, SSM.
The Mighty Big D has spoken! He does not feel the need to cross that bridge.
<quoted text>
There are thousands of polygamists/plural marriage practitioners in the country too.
<quoted text>
does the Brown family make you feel stronger too.
<quoted text>
We both know you failed to address the question. At what point does marriage as matter of public policy/common societal understanding and/or norm, become meaningless. Today its SSM, tomorrow poly, after that.....?
OK you stick with the slippery slope, but I should warn you, it wonít bother anyone other than you people that are already scared to death that same sex couples can marry in 10 states and one district and are recognized in 12 and that number is growing every year.

That argument wont work on anyone else, and your numbers are dwindling as to the folks that argument will work on.

It certainly didnít work with the courts, I donít know who you are trying to convince. That kind of "scary" argument will only work on the fearful and those that already want to dictate to everyone else what they are allowed to do.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#186738 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not arguing against marriage equality, you are. I am arguing for it. Perhaps you are misunderstanding me, hence your frustration?
Oh I donít have an frustration except I keep making the mistake of overestimating your reasoning capacity.

Do I have to explain it to you again? I would vote in favor of Poly marriage, I have not been arguing against it at all, you cannot separate in your pea brain discussion about an issue regarding it and the actual position.

You are like a village idiot with one foot nailed to the floor, running in circles and donít know what to do.

But while you run around in circles, more and more states and nations are recognizing same sex marriage. Hope that makes you happy as you claim it does.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186739 Apr 5, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
....The Mighty Big D has spoken! He does not feel the need to cross that bridge...
Bravo! You have summed up his entire argument against true marriage equality very succinctly.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186740 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
OK you stick with the slippery slope, but I should warn you, it wonít bother anyone other than you people that are already scared to death that same sex couples can marry in 10 states and one district and are recognized in 12 and that number is growing every year.
That argument wont work on anyone else, and your numbers are dwindling as to the folks that argument will work on.
It certainly didnít work with the courts, I donít know who you are trying to convince. That kind of "scary" argument will only work on the fearful and those that already want to dictate to everyone else what they are allowed to do.
No one is scared to death over same sex marriage, drama queen. What are the latest percentages of people who support it? Does that look like Americans being scared to death of it?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186741 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I donít have an frustration except I keep making the mistake of overestimating your reasoning capacity.
Do I have to explain it to you again? I would vote in favor of Poly marriage, I have not been arguing against it at all, you cannot separate in your pea brain discussion about an issue regarding it and the actual position.
You are like a village idiot with one foot nailed to the floor, running in circles and donít know what to do.
But while you run around in circles, more and more states and nations are recognizing same sex marriage. Hope that makes you happy as you claim it does.
Sure you'd vote for those sick fundies "using polygamy to commit their crimes like child molesting and welfare fraud", we believe you Big D!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186742 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I donít have an frustration except I keep making the mistake of overestimating your reasoning capacity.
Do I have to explain it to you again? I would vote in favor of Poly marriage, I have not been arguing against it at all, you cannot separate in your pea brain discussion about an issue regarding it and the actual position.
You are like a village idiot with one foot nailed to the floor, running in circles and donít know what to do.
But while you run around in circles, more and more states and nations are recognizing same sex marriage. Hope that makes you happy as you claim it does.
It's like someone saying oh hell yeah, I support SSM even though homosexuals will use it to commit their crimes of welfare fraud and child molestation. Look in the news there was a case of it in Utah.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Laser treatment that tackles toenail fungus ava... (Jan '09) Dec 12 Gary Puntman 165
Police Shooting on April 28 / victim Victor Col... (May '14) Dec 6 Retired Law 2
School Closings: Port Huron, Marysville (Feb '08) Nov 25 hpallett 11
Men injured in Oroville shooting Nov 24 deborahughes 1
Oroville super Walmart project appeals consider... (Dec '10) Nov '14 mikmax 73
Historic Bridge Part of the Virginia Turnpike T... (Apr '14) Nov '14 American Gentlema... 2
Butte vows to defy unfunded mandates: Superviso... (Feb '09) Nov '14 backyard223 22
Oroville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oroville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Oroville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oroville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:21 am PST