Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185307 Mar 28, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
It’s about equality fool. You a-wipes are the ones who backed us into a corner. Now we’re fighting back and kicking your ---es and there’s nothing you can do to stop us but whine like a bunch of sniveling wimps. Don’t like it, too bad mo-fo. The tide has turned and it’s raining on you haters. We’re smarter, better educated, organized and pissed off and we won’t stop until we have everything we want and maybe more. And all you can do is sit there and watch and run your toothless ignorant mouth. I suggest you got have another drink and beat your wife, maybe then you’ll feel like a man.
that was really good.

check out the current issue of "time" magazine.

they have an article on wife beaters, laid out JUST like a national geograpic article(im not kidding)

you know?? where they show pictures inside some white trash residence, with pictures of this tattoed red neck ACTUALLY beating his wife!!

a pile of pabst blue riboon in the corner..

Im looking forward to the tolerant future....

and a shortage of hater(as they die off)

and greater understanding of some of the things people need to learn more about before making rash judgements on.

it will be great!!
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185308 Mar 28, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you serious, I know he’s your new man crush and all, but, can’t you see the hypocrisy of his/her/it’s posts? Either he’s lying about being a freak or lying about being a freak. Either way, he’s a liar and a liar. Not to mention, he posts scientific THEORY as fact, and you sheep just eat it up without question. I had a bit of respect for you when you were a bigot just because you were a bigot, but, it’s when you try to glom onto his deceptions that you lose all respectability. Why is it so important to you that you have common unity with your fellow haters?
why do they need unity with their fellow haters??

I think you already nailed it before....

they are getting their sorry a&&es kicked on this issue, like WE knew well they would.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185309 Mar 28, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
But, I have posted them before, and you have ignored them before, as you are doing now. True to form, and, you're a fine one to whine about cheap jabs. Go and tell someone to give their kid a pearl necklace.
I'll take that to mean you know you don't have a good argument against gay marriage, and you are just bigoted against gay people. If you did have a good argument, you post it, after all, Bigfoot, I'm not the only one who can see your posts.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185310 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
how are basic rights a trophy??
are a deluded old man??
You said you hurt your back when you were 15 and now you are an old man? The rights are already in place without marriage. What's funny is how the bong can decide everyone's age here....lol

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185311 Mar 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of silly question, I answer that every time I post.
'Monster mutation' Clearly major genetic mistakes.
If I can admit that, why are you such a sissy about admitting a epi-marker mistaken mark?
Smirk.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
What good are you?
:)

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185312 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
yet 58% of the population WANTS gay marraige.

it is time to wake up OLD man.
Did we vote or did the advocate do a poll? How old am I? are you? You are the idiot that says he has a slip disk at age 15 and has done nothing but smoke pot, hey fool pot won't cure a slip disk, I'm assuming you are 17 now? Because after 2 years if it's not better, you need surgery, or did u wait too long relying on pot to fix it? Now it's fuked for life. dumb you.

The justices’ voting
behavior is largely a product of their own ideological pref-
erences. Not the public opinion

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185313 Mar 28, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
I am just trying to help you look a little more educated than you are Rose.
I know it's a lost cause.
You took an extension class on the Constitution, and think you "educated".
I'm much better educated than you. It's funny, really.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185314 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>
surgery is always the last option....as someone into alternative medicine...
im sure you can understand that one.
if you cant??
then your a crusty old man who is OUTA touch with current trends.
that is obvious with your bigoted stance on gay marriage.
no one has EVER presented a cohearant arguement on why gays shouldnt marry.
A slip disk heals in 2 years or you need surgery. Smoking pot won't cure it fool. How old am I? I'm not old, but I have respect for elder folks. Even gays get old. Is that your best hate speech calling a person you have no idea the age "old"...lol

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185315 Mar 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hunty,
My size indicates that as a MAN--a BIG, 100%, hairy ass, knuckle draggin' MAN--I am NOT ashamed of being referred to as a sissy!
What I find fascinating is your attempts to stir up some shizz between telegraph hemp and me.
You're very dogged aren't you?
I have no beef with T.H.
You're chasing after the wrong cha-cha heels on this one.
SNAP!
You are a sissy because you make a statement then back down when another gay person, a pothead says comparing gay lifestyle to animals is bigot language. Did you make a mistake saying that? Or did another gay man make you back down? no pun intended.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185317 Mar 28, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, I am done with you.
We can continue our conversation when you learn how to present your arguments in complete sentences, with at least the slightest attempt at proper grammar, and perhaps with a little coherence.
Until then, you simply sound like an uneducated fool, and there is no purpose to our discourse.
Well said, Hemp is proof that we need to take a further look into making pot illegal.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185318 Mar 28, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
Equal Right's do not always result in Equal Outcomes.
Equal Right's do? Buzz cut? Afro? Mullet?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#185319 Mar 28, 2013
hemp for telelgraphs wrote:
<quoted text>

then your a crusty old man who is OUTA touch with current trends.
that is obvious with your bigoted stance on gay marriage.
no one has EVER presented a cohearant arguement on why gays shouldnt marry.
Sorry pot head, I have respect for old people. I'm not a bigot like you. Stop drinking the hater aid. does the bong make all that hate come out?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185320 Mar 28, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
But everyone IS treated equally under the law.
Not true.
A man is allowed to marry a woman, but a woman isn't.
A woman is allowed to marry a man, but a man isn't.
akpilot wrote:
Look Rose, people with an actual law degree
Unlike you. LOL!
akpilot wrote:
who's opinion matter's- unlike yours- explained it to you.
"Plaintiffs cite Loving for the proposition that a statute can discriminate even if it treats both classes identically. This misconstrues the Loving analysis because the antimiscegenation statute did not treat blacks and whites identically—it restricted who whites could marry (but did not restrict intermarriage between non-whites) for the purpose of promoting white supremacy. Virginia's antimiscegenation statute was the quintessential example of invidious racial discrimination as it was intended to advantage one race and disadvantage all others, which is why the Supreme Court applied strict scrutiny and struck it down as violating the core interest of the Equal Protection Clause.
In contrast, neither men nor women are disproportionately disadvantaged or burdened by the fact that New York's Domestic Relations Law allows only opposite-sex couples to marry—both genders are treated precisely the same way.
They are now. Gay marriage is allowed in NY. Try to keep up, stupid.
akpilot wrote:
As such, there is no gender [*16]classification triggering intermediate scrutiny.
Nor does the statutory scheme create a classification based on sexual orientation. In this respect, the Domestic Relations Law is facially neutral: individuals who seek marriage licenses are not queried concerning their sexual orientation and are not precluded from marrying if they are not heterosexual. Regardless of sexual orientation, any person can marry a person of the opposite sex. "- Hernandez v Robles
You really should get your GED before you attempt to interpret the law Rose.
I pass gas better educated than you are. You don't have a single earned degree. Admit it.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#185321 Mar 28, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You took an extension class on the Constitution, and think you "educated".
I'm much better educated than you. It's funny, really.
Rose_NoHo.

Yes. I agree. Not mentioning any names, of course, but anyone who "believes" the currently prevailing myth that the founding fathers had anything to do with the Republican's infamous 14th Amendment that did so much damage to the nation when high paid agenda driven Government judges departed from the Constitution to inflict their "Brown" dictate - as well as fostering the preposterous notion of Homosexual "marriage" - should take a beginning course in the Constitution. We dog lovers, though, can take heart knowing that we are next.

Ronald

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#185322 Mar 28, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
This SSM argument isn't about marriage, it's about government benefits. Admit that, and we have some common ground upon which to stand.
Bigfoot, if it were just about government benefits, gay people would just marry someone of the opposite sex. So, it should be clear, even to a dummy like you, that it's not just about government benefits.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185323 Mar 28, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>A slip disk heals in 2 years or you need surgery. Smoking pot won't cure it fool. How old am I? I'm not old, but I have respect for elder folks. Even gays get old. Is that your best hate speech calling a person you have no idea the age "old"...lol
wasnt this thread about gay marraige...??

richardo...just to let you know...

there are a WHOLE slew of things that gay people joined in "UNIONS" dont enjoy the same way married people do....

look them up and get back to me...

you are such a lazy study...
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185324 Mar 29, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Well said, Hemp is proof that we need to take a further look into making pot illegal.
POT is illegal.....if you dont have a doctors recommendation.

it has been decriminalized in some some states, so that you wont get trouble for a small amount.

further criminalizing drugs will not work...prohibition hasnt worked from the start.. the proof is that weed is more popular and availible than ever.....

wait, I thought you wanted marijuana made legal??

because you thought the whole medical thing was a guise for people to get high...??

you lieterally change your opinion according to who you are talking to.

no moring at all!!

amazing!
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185325 Mar 29, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Did we vote or did the advocate do a poll? How old am I? are you? You are the idiot that says he has a slip disk at age 15 and has done nothing but smoke pot, hey fool pot won't cure a slip disk, I'm assuming you are 17 now? Because after 2 years if it's not better, you need surgery, or did u wait too long relying on pot to fix it? Now it's fuked for life. dumb you.
The justices’ voting
behavior is largely a product of their own ideological pref-
erences. Not the public opinion
that is not what most people gathered from the proceeedings...

considering you refuse to listen to them....??

you cant know much about what happened?

so ill tell ya..

all your arguements were literally laughed out of court....

both days.

this has been fun, i thank you for entertaining me by being so bassackwards....

you make me realize how evolved i am comaped to some..

Ps: im watching lincoln right now...

the bigots in the movie who are against the 13th amendment, sound just like you guys do.

regardless of party.....both party were full of bigots.

it is amazing they passed it.
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185326 Mar 29, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose_NoHo.
Yes. I agree. Not mentioning any names, of course, but anyone who "believes" the currently prevailing myth that the founding fathers had anything to do with the Republican's infamous 14th Amendment that did so much damage to the nation when high paid agenda driven Government judges departed from the Constitution to inflict their "Brown" dictate - as well as fostering the preposterous notion of Homosexual "marriage" - should take a beginning course in the Constitution. We dog lovers, though, can take heart knowing that we are next.
Ronald
lunatic fringe??

I know your out there.

your in hiding......and you go to your meetings...
hemp for telelgraphs

Anderson, CA

#185327 Mar 29, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You are a sissy because you make a statement then back down when another gay person, a pothead says comparing gay lifestyle to animals is bigot language. Did you make a mistake saying that? Or did another gay man make you back down? no pun intended.
what else am I supposed to call you when you compare human beings to dogs??

racists do that to black people...

you are no different.

bigot.

fascist.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hate crimes against blacks, Latinos, transgende... 11 hr TerriB1 1
News Super Wal-mart still in progress (Feb '09) Sep 26 BobRoundHole 141
News Trio faces felony charges after 100 cars vandal... Sep 16 Jodi 1
Family Court Corruption (May '12) Sep 14 worriedmom 4
News Gleaners hand out 5,000 pounds of salmom (Nov '10) Sep 8 Michael Joseph 8
News Egbert convicted of second-degree murder (Oct '08) Sep 5 Bob 7
News Victims of apparent triple homicide identified (Jul '08) Aug '16 Itzmealwayz 52

Oroville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oroville Mortgages