What I don't comprehend is your continued misreading of my position.<quoted text>
again I donít need to read any further, you still donít comprehend
I did not say it would.and annulment requires one of the married couple to desire an annulment, it is NOT something the state will step in against their wishes and terminate the marriage.
Perhaps if you looked past your own inflated ego, you'd see I never stated it was a requirement for a marriage license. It is however part of marital jurisprudence. As I pointed out several post ago, which you ignored.You still have not been able to separate it in your tiny little mind so we will go over it again
Consummation is not any kind of requirement for a marriage, not in any conceivable from, even fundamentalist Churches have performed marriage ceremonies for veterans that could not consummate the marriage, let alone the legal aspect that it is not in any way any kind of requirement for a marriage license.
Have you got that yet? or do we need to go over it again
Do u understand I never said it was. Probably not, you'll more than likely continue to pontificate about the secular sacred cow know as same sex marriage.No reason for a divorce or annulment is used to deny a couple that requests a marriage license.... do you have that now?
The All Wise and Powerful Big D has spoken, all hail the Big D. Ignore the man behind the curtain.We can go over this dead argument as many times as you like
Procreation is a dead argument, consummation is a dead argumentÖ do you have it yet?
The bottom line is that SSM is, again, the secular sacred cow, of the left, and there's no possible argument against it, for everyone who opposes it, including those self hating traitor gays, are homophobes, bigots, and anti gays. Your continued pontificating on the matter only proves that.
I see no compelling reason for it. However different situations, different solutions. Several states, and countries have acknowledged this, and same sex couples, by granting them civil unions. Your turn, let's see if you respond with what I think you will, but I give you the benefit of the doubt.