Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,801

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184600 Mar 25, 2013
Wat the hell wrote:
Tomorrow is the big day in court. It's the beginning of the end of the gay marriage bans not just in California but Pennsylvania, Texas, Mississippi, Oregon, and all of the states that deny LGBT couples equal rights under the law. Time is up bigots. June 2013. Remember that date.
Arrogance with the deeeeep argument that the opposition is only bigotry.

Just another reason ss couples are not marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#184601 Mar 25, 2013
poopndiek wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO.. Me thinks it is YOU that "dost protest too much"! Just like a lady!
That was the lesbian in me.

Smile.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#184602 Mar 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
for now... if DOMA falls, any challenge to the states that ban them will be easily overturned on constitutional grounds
You are on the wrong side of right and wrong, and certainly on the wrong side of history
You are so confused.

DOMA has already failed in court, and the basis for that decision was the the RIGHT to REGULATE and DEFINE marriage rested with the STATE!!! The SCOTUS upholding that decision would AFFIRM that the STATES have the power to REGULATE and DEFINE marriage. It would do NOTHING to help your argument.

You really should stop pretending that you understand the legal system.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#184603 Mar 25, 2013
endocannabanoid system wrote:
<quoted text>
your hysteria is just silly now.
"to set a course agianst global warming"??
hint: that would be easier if you guys stopped denying that it exists in the first place...
Most all the R's have been suckered into it. They discovered that it's another money grab that the liberals have been using for awhile.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#184604 Mar 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a matter of degree, the far left of the democratic party is a small minority and has no real voice in the party.
Not so with the far right for the Republican party, who are currently vetting every nominee. Rush speaks to them every day, they will only watch Faux news.
3rd party is likely to happen in the next 20 years, the republicans will spin off the Tea Party
But like other 3rd parties I donít expect it will survive.
If you buy this nonsense you really need to get your head checked.

If the "far right" had the clout you claim Romney would have never made it to NH in the Primary.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#184605 Mar 25, 2013
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?

How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?

Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.

So sad.
endocannabanoid system

Anderson, CA

#184606 Mar 25, 2013
akpilot wrote:
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?
How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?
Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.
So sad.
you are right here with, us mr. pursuit of liberty for all...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#184607 Mar 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Even 'just a little bit' of segregation and apartheid is bad. Same sex marriage introduces a new form of segregation to perfectly integrated and diverse male/female marriage.
For the love of pete, Brian, I have never had a conversation with someone that was more exasperating than one with you. I asked you to explain yourself and all you do is repeat the same statements with absolutely no supporting argument. You don't seem capable of elaborating on anything with any degreeof intelligence.

You keep mentioning gender apartheid and segregation look up the definition of things before you use them:

gender apartheid (also called sex apartheid) is economic and social sexual discrimination against women, including strict sex segregation, as well as an "absence of justice for women in much of the non-Western world." Practices deemed instances of gender apartheid include the legal killing of wives for adultery in Syria and Haiti, wife beating in Nigeria, women needing their husband's consent for divorce in Israel, and legal kidnapping and marriage of women in Guatemala and Lebanon. Aspects of the treatment of women under fundamentalist Islam, Christianity, Judaism and Buddhism have also been described as gender apartheid.

segregation: the separation or isolation of a race, class, or ethnic group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social intercourse, by separate educational facilities, or by other discriminatory means

Now, one last time, try explaining just what it is youíre trying to claim instead of just repeating yourself. No group is being isolated. In fact one group is asking for inclusion and people like you insist on the continued isolation of them. If anyone is promoting apartheid it is you.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#184609 Mar 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
More BS gay twirl lies.
The latest science says homosexuality is a epi-marker mistake.
Moreover, the most intimate imitation of natural sex, anal sex, is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. I've posted that fact from a gay friendly medical site many times if someone doesn't have the common sense to know the anus is not a vagina.
Could be just a couple reasons why it's so hard for every culture in all of human history to get...
Snicker.
Listen up, wannabe scientist. You are not smart enough or qualified to translate scientific theory, thatís right I said THEORY, as fact. Not to mention, in all Iíve read about the ďepi-markersĒ(a term made up by you) the word mistake is never mentioned. Scientific research is meant to discover and understand, not judge. Why do you continually misrepresent and twist the research? You continually accuse people of putting a twirl on things, but, youíre the biggest twirler of them all.
Also, Mark Regnerus is a puppet for anti-equality hate groups, not an independent researcher. His research has not been peer reviewed or authenticated. Besides, heís made clear his prejudices toward Gay Americans, so how could he conduct an unbiased study?
Youíre looking for a logical reason for your hate, but, itís your hate that clouds your objectivity. You canít find any logical reason/research that offers any valid argument against full marriage equality for Gay Americans so you twist (and twirl as you so often like to say) the information to support your less than honorable opinion.
The rest of your post is utter nonsense and not worthy of a response.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#184610 Mar 25, 2013
akpilot wrote:
How sad is it that there are generally 6-8 people who have no life, and spend their lonely days trolling the thread to post judge-it's not based on the content of the post, but based on the name attached to the post?
How much sadder would it be if there was only 1 person?
Seriously, look at the judge-its. With near 100% accuracy you will see page after page, 6-8 judge-it's.
So sad.
You sound like a sniveling wimp. Face it, you donít have anything to offer and should just go away. Iím sure this isnít the first time youíve heard this.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#184611 Mar 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmmmmm.......not quite. There's coital sexual intercourse, which is the act referenced regarding consummation of the marital relationship by husband and wife, and can result in conception. Anal intercourse is......well....just a pain in the arse. Remember if sex is a pain in the arse, you're doing it the wrong way.
Sorry VV, couldn't resist.:)
If it's such a pain in the arse, why do heterosexual couples also do it?

And I'm not talking about homosexual and heterosexual intercourse being the same biologically. I'm talking about it being equal from a purely legal standpoint. In the eyes of the law, there is no difference. Neither are illegal. Both are legal. How much more equal can you get?
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#184612 Mar 25, 2013
head satanist wrote:
<quoted text>..........barrack obama george bush jr and sr and tyhe clintons.....all donated money to san francisco over 400 million plus technlogy....for people to get sex changes for free.........us goverment estimated over 400 million people around the world and even san francisco were forced into sex changes.....some of the people have gotten false memory syndrome not remembering that they were the opposite sex ....so if two guys were forced into sex changes and do not know because of people lieing to them every day useing false photographs and memorys these two guys who now look like woman will still be attracted to woman......out of the 400 million forced into sex changes since 2006 99 percent do not have memorys of the sex change...as in drug you up knock you out you wont remember a thing
Because they all have homosexual tendencies.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#184613 Mar 25, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Divorce maintains consent in marriage; if same sex marriage was licensed I believe the left would attack the consent standard next.
Same sex marriage could harm homosexuals with suits of alienation of affection. Imagine what would happen if every homosexual would become liable for financial damages after a casual tryst.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_af...
Same sex marriage is bad because it harms gays.
You keep on coming up with dumber and dumber arguments.
Imagine what would happen if every heterosexual would become liable for financial damages after a casual tryst...
I think that's because you are dumb.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#184615 Mar 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Arrogance with the deeeeep argument that the opposition is only bigotry.
Just another reason ss couples are not marriage.
You "marriage" could never be one, monster.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#184616 Mar 25, 2013
queers can't get married in California

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#184617 Mar 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
That was the lesbian in me.
Smile.
Monster. You are just a monster mutation, there is no lesbian in you, just some tissue with female genes.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#184618 Mar 25, 2013
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#184619 Mar 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Another lie.
If you used my argument, you would use my example. My wife and I fostered over ten children who were restored to their parent(s).
Why is it VV, that you can never argue from the facts? Does that not trouble you inside? Are you that seared? Sad.
So, all foster children are returned to their parents? And all same-gender families are incapable and unfit to provide foster care or an adoptive home? Show me a study... Show me proof...

I argue from facts and the real world. You have fostered 10 or so kids. Big whoop! Give you a a gold star! Same-gender parents foster and adopt thousands of children. And some how they manage to turn out just fine.

Your sole goal is to trash gays and lesbians from every angle. You don't rely on any science. You GRASP at epigenetics. You LIE and say that scientists have found THE answer. Not a single scientist has said with 100% certainty that epigenetics are related to homosexuality. Yet you come on here and LIE repeatedly, trying to convince everyone that they have.

Aren't Christians supposed to avoid lying?

endocannabanoid system

Anderson, CA

#184620 Mar 25, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen up, wannabe scientist. You are not smart enough or qualified to translate scientific theory, thatís right I said THEORY, as fact. Not to mention, in all Iíve read about the ďepi-markersĒ(a term made up by you) the word mistake is never mentioned. Scientific research is meant to discover and understand, not judge. Why do you continually misrepresent and twist the research? You continually accuse people of putting a twirl on things, but, youíre the biggest twirler of them all.
Also, Mark Regnerus is a puppet for anti-equality hate groups, not an independent researcher. His research has not been peer reviewed or authenticated. Besides, heís made clear his prejudices toward Gay Americans, so how could he conduct an unbiased study?
Youíre looking for a logical reason for your hate, but, itís your hate that clouds your objectivity. You canít find any logical reason/research that offers any valid argument against full marriage equality for Gay Americans so you twist (and twirl as you so often like to say) the information to support your less than honorable opinion.
The rest of your post is utter nonsense and not worthy of a response.
in other words.....get on that SSM love train, or be run over by the tide of history!!

momentum is clearly with us...
Judgment Day

Henderson, NV

#184621 Mar 25, 2013
The ad hominems against a very reasonable poster--the absolute filth spewed by idiots--shows you know how good that poster's arguments are.

You're asking to be treated as equals and yet act this way.

I'm almost glad about the massive meningitis plague in NY's homosexual community.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Oroville Tacos (Aug '14) Mar 25 tamikajohnson1959 5
News Suspected gang leader arrested in Reno (Feb '10) Feb '15 fee 29
Review: Grain FED Worm Castings Feb '15 grainfed 2
Letter: Elected officials have to stop PG&E cle... Feb '15 Timothy Siegel 1
News Laser treatment that tackles toenail fungus ava... (Jan '09) Jan '15 SaTaN 166
any girls want to Skype? Jan '15 SaTaN 2
News Funeral today for homicide victims (Jul '08) Jan '15 Ridiculous Website 1 38
Oroville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oroville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]