Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,317

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180998 Feb 23, 2013
Oh, and save your breath with the yawn.

I already know you have no logical rebuttal.

Snicker.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#180999 Feb 23, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Wouldn't dream of it.
Because here is the proof that you are the liar. Please read this cut-n-paste of the entire exchange between you and akpilot, and witness the fact that nowhere in these exchanges has he posted that he doesn't know what that 4th grade nonsense means. He has posted that there is a difference between knowing what it means and using it.
Please read:
" Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Not my fault you are ignorant.
But you could try using a search engine.
IKYABWAI
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php ...
Urban dictionary? And you are calling me ignorant?
Thanks for the laugh.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are ignorant.
You don't even know what IKYABWAI means.
LOLSER.
Do you know what that means?
Knowing what it means is a far cry from actually using it.
If you are trying to make a case for your famed high level of education, you are doing a piss poor job of it.
Seriously, citing the Urban Dictionary? Put down the pipe Rose and join the rest of us in reality.
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Knowing what it means is a far cry from actually using it.
If you are trying to make a case for your famed high level of education, you are doing a piss poor job of it.
Seriously, citing the Urban Dictionary? Put down the pipe Rose and join the rest of us in reality.
You didn't know what it meant.
Why else would you have said anything about Urban Dictionary? LOL!
Must suck to be you. "
Thank you for being so easy to prove as the liar. Spin away. I already expect you to attempt to twist this into some bullshit. Save yourself some wasted time and simply admit that you got caught like a rat in a trap of your own making. Dumb-ass. And liar.
What are you claiming I said that was a lie, ugly? Do you even know who said what? The Urban Dictionary is a good source to use for finding the meanings of acronyms used on the internet.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181000 Feb 23, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No. It won't. Huh...."Urban Dictionary"....How ethnic. I prefer the "Websters Dictionary", and proper English, myself.
LOL. The Urban Dictionary isn't ethnic, ugly.

Thanks for the good hardy laugh! http://www.urbandictionary.com/

It's accurate, too. Look up "Rose"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
"A girl usually Hot and has a great personality"
"The most beautiful girl ever."

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181001 Feb 23, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Tis you who cannot twist this. He was answering that 4th grade nonsense with the correct answer. You DID ask, didn't you ? "IKYABWAI" is the question, and "incoherent" was the answer. No twist-ability to that. Straight answer to a silly question. Don't embarrass yourself any more than you already have.
Do you know what "incoherent" means? It indicates he didn't understand what I said. He thought what I said was incoherent. So, I explained it to him, ugly.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181002 Feb 23, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Putting pubic hair on Chongos head was a nice touch, eh ?
:-D
And you're a racist, too. Well, we've known that for some time.

Why do you lie about being a Wiccan?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181003 Feb 23, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I know who this runt is, it's that "TooManyLaws" schmuck that got himself banned for making threats. That piece of trailer trash that needs 3 hillbillies with guns to face down 1 ex-frog-man...
You got banned for not taking that pic of your ugly mug back down!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181004 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Falling back on old meaningless points, again? Who said heterosexuality was no longer relevant to marriage? No one. And what does heterosexuality have to do with monogamy?
You did. And I agree. Heterosexuality is no longer relevant to marriage in many states. Therefore, why should monogamy be still relevant?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181005 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Who?
Justin Michael for one.

http://poly-nyc.com/
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181006 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>You just proved my point.
You don't seem to have a point. Beyond angry ad hominem. Same as always.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181007 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
hahahahahahah
Meaningless post includes insane laugh proves you're at a loss for a cogent argument once again.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181008 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text> Do you even read what you write, or are you just desperate for laughs and attention? What exactly would be the benefit of trying to fool a psychiatrist?
Meaning less angry ad hominem post as always.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181009 Feb 23, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
Why? You didn't. LOL!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181010 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo is just a troll. He's really against gay marriage. That's clear. He babbles about polygamy, but that's just to flood the forum, because he doesn't have a rational argument against gay marriage. He is so dumb, that when I use the term "red herring", he says I'm talking about a fish!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181011 Feb 23, 2013
Marriage. There is no one right way.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181013 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being.
Oh, lord. What crap.

Anyway, the only issue here is marriage as a legal contract. All US citizens should have equal protection under the law, regardless of genes. Seems to me you'd be in favor of that.
KiMare wrote:
In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Oh, puke.

Hallmark called, they want their sentimental nonsense back...
KiMare wrote:
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
What about you? You have a set of female and male genes.
Should you be allowed to marry? If so, why?

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181014 Feb 23, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Frankie Rizzo is just a troll. He's really against gay marriage. That's clear. He babbles about polygamy, but that's just to flood the forum, because he doesn't have a rational argument against gay marriage. He is so dumb, that when I use the term "red herring", he says I'm talking about a fish!
Says the most angry and off topic little ad hominem troll on this thread.

Is that your best argument? Priceless!

P.S. Why are you a hypocrite?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181015 Feb 23, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Frankie Rizzo is just a troll. He's really against gay marriage. That's clear. He babbles about polygamy, but that's just to flood the forum, because he doesn't have a rational argument against gay marriage. He is so dumb, that when I use the term "red herring", he says I'm talking about a fish!
Polygamy is marriage. Worthy of the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage.

If that bothers you, you'll have to do better than calling it a red herring. I know you think it's very cute and witty, but it's not. It's stupid. It won't fly in court.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181016 Feb 23, 2013
Both communities (gay and poly) are concerned with love, and forming lasting relationships, and with our own liberation."
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181017 Feb 23, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
...Anyway, the only issue here is marriage as a legal contract. All US citizens should have equal protection under the law, regardless of genes. Seems to me you'd be in favor of that....
Yes all U.S. citizens shall have equal protection. Where does it say "except polygamists"?

When polygamy is legalized it will be via the same path same sex marriage is. Glad that makes you angry, hypocrite.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181018 Feb 23, 2013
"I'd encourage people to keep an open mind," he asserted, "it wasn't too long ago that gay relationships were completely ostracized.

Justin Michael said.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oroville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Laser treatment that tackles toenail fungus ava... (Jan '09) Jan 20 SaTaN 166
any girls want to Skype? Jan 20 SaTaN 2
Review: Grain FED Worm Castings Jan 20 Joeknows 1
Funeral today for homicide victims (Jul '08) Jan 12 Ridiculous Website 1 38
: Homes near Palermo evacuated as fire burns st... (Jun '08) Jan 5 Joan Rios 20
Men injured in Oroville shooting Jan 3 trizteza 2
Police Shooting on April 28 / victim Victor Col... (May '14) Jan 1 WeCopWatch 3
Oroville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oroville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:26 am PST