grunds: does days & rambler have the goods to convict

WAS sanka wrote:

<quoted text>
The reason it says people who visited this page also visited...
Is because every hour of every F*CKING day for the last YEAR you have visited those pages after visiting the first one.
WHY?
Because you are crazy
nutz
coo coo
deranged
insane
paranoid
A
N
D
an unpleasant liar

Rambler wrote:

To the question if Richard Grund is an exorcist or not.....and how exactly he "disciples" his minions.
A Literal War
Posted by Michael Kelley on February 10, 2011 at 4:42 PM
The Church is called to stand against Satan and his forces of darkness. We are called to "demolish strongholds" and "take every thought captive to the obedience of Christ." (2 Corinthians 10:3-5). However, we in the Church tend to forget about the demonic aspect of strongholds in our lives. We tend to acknowledge things as being from Satan figuratively instead of literally.
We have to remember that this war we are in is literal, not figurative. The Fallen One and his forces are literally out there against all mankind, as man is made in the image of Almighty God, whpo the Fallen One hates [Isaiah 14:12-15]. We in the Church are His ambassadors [2 Corinthians 5:20], and are "in the world, but not of the world" [John 17:14]. We essentially have been given "diplomatic immunity" through Christ, as Richard Grund pointed out on Acceleration Radio with L.A. Marzulli [I have posted a "poem" by Richard Grund in a past Blog entry, titled, "From an Alien's Perspective."]
Many times, we get caught up Ephesians 6:12, that "our struggle is not against flesh and blood" to the point that we begin taking the battle as a figurative mind-game. They are not flesh and blood, but rather spiritual entities, but that does not negate their physical nature. They are every bit as physical as we are, if not more so, and the battle is real and literal.
Richard Grund is a real-life exorcist, which is completely different from the Hollywood-hyped-up style of exorcism. We all face "monsters" in our lives and must bury ourselves in the Word and bury those we help get away from the monsters in the Word. He pointed out in the show that it does no good to set someone free if you are not going to disciple them. The demonic presence in their lives will just return with a much greater intensity.
http://biblestudynow.webs.com/apps/blog/show/...

Rambler wrote:

More on Chichen Itza, December, 2012 and the Spiritual Response Team
***
10 Extraordinary Questions With… Richard Grund of the Supernatural Response Team
– APRIL 10, 2012
2012 seems to have started off with a bang. From bizarre weather patterns and earthquakes to reports of weird noises being heard worldwide and even strange events in the cosmos, we’re barely into the New Year and already it seems things are heating up. Many are looking to Mayan prophecies and other ancient predictions to explain what is happening. Do you believe that there is anything significant about 2012?
I believe what makes 2012 so significant is that the fallen angels and their demonic offspring seem to think it’s significant. The amount of paranormal, New Age and occult activity has been building since 2007 and is culminating in their effort to open the portals or gates on 12/21/12. In my opinion much of what we are seeing, and hearing, is a manifestation of what is going on all around us spiritually. As a society we have been dumbed down (on purpose I believe) about the supernatural dangers in our world. Because of who I am and how the Lord has made me I keep a vigilant eye on these things. Some people call me a Watchman but I do more than “watch” I react as well. I see myself more as a sheepdog to the Great Shepherd who watches over and guards the flock and reacts to the “wolves” if the endanger the flock. To do that I have to keep my eyes open to everything.
I believe what we are seeing now began back in 2007 and is tied into the fascination with the paranormal. I believe the powers of darkness began an agenda that started in 1947 with the event at Roswell that has been in effect since the fall of Satan – to put events into motion that will create a world in which the fallen can return and once again rule & reign. The Bible calls this the Days of Noah. So, the increase in activity and interest in this activity creates a “charged” atmosphere that they can utilize for their own agenda. 2012, I believe, is their intended culmination that if unimpeded will result in some form of a coming out party for the fallen angels and their demonic offspring. Whether they do that as aliens, the return of the gods of mythology, the return of the Mayan gods such as Quetzalcoatl (“feathered serpent” or “plumed serpent”; Feathered-Serpent ) or all of the above I do not know. What I do know is that the indicators are there for some event that will lead to a great deception.
What people need to realize is that millions of people are working toward this very thing by doing ceremonies and “awakenings” of the various sacred sites and vortexes around the world. Interestingly enough these events began in 2007 as well. Energy attracts energy and spiritual energy attracts spiritual energy. So, with all of these events and the worldwide events scheduled to take place all over the world at every sacred site, temple or Mayan ruins such as Chichen Itza something is bound to happen, in my opinion. We (SRT) are watching, working against this and preparing for whatever outcome. In fact, we are raising the money to be at Chichen Itza on December 21, 2012 to be in place in case the Lord needs us to intervene. It’s best to prepare and not need to do anything then need to do something and not be prepared.
http://extraordinaryintelligence.com/7937/the...

marcemon wrote:

<quoted text>
Astonishing that she never figured she was looking at her own footprints. Unless she's missing a bigfoot.
You think she'll bake clay babies here?

Tired of Silly wrote:

<quoted text>
And I really couldn't care less, loser. Anyone who still THINKS about the Casey Anthony case needs psychiatric help.

chrissy wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks rambler. I haven't seen this article. I notice he makes it clear he wants what he writes to be taken literally.
I'll be back later to chat more.

marcemon wrote:

<quoted text>
Then I suggest you don't bother reading any of these threads.

marcemon wrote:

<quoted text>
Then I suggest you don't bother reading any of these threads.

General 4 wrote:

<quoted text>
Marce, I hope you will overlook my bad grammar, I think the thread should have been entitled "DO" rather than "DOES"
Sorry about that, I was in the other room - office drawing up Schematics and concentrating on Estimates for my next muchly big $$ job and simply needed a break from this and the interminable rantings of Days, Scamber Child Killer Lovers.
So many innuendo half crazed posts have been submitted by the aforementioned that I had to question my own level of IQ. Ergo the new thread - Whereby Days and Scrams can once again be Siamese Twins interacting with each other much like they did on the Jessica Thread.

General 4 wrote:

<quoted text>
Marce, I hope you will overlook my bad grammar, I think the thread should have been entitled "DO" rather than "DOES"
Sorry about that, I was in the other room - office drawing up Schematics and concentrating on Estimates for my next muchly big $$ job and simply needed a break from this and the interminable rantings of Days, Scamber Child Killer Lovers.
So many innuendo half crazed posts have been submitted by the aforementioned that I had to question my own level of IQ. Ergo the new thread - Whereby Days and Scrams can once again be Siamese Twins interacting with each other much like they did on the Jessica Thread.

General 4 wrote:

<quoted text>
HMMM! Scrmbled will quicly point out to the unkowing that - TOS in a backward kind pf way read SOT.
Vodka, Gin or Ripple ya think ?

Rambler wrote:

No Stoping Now
http://www.youtube.com/user/skyzze/featured
I think skyzze has mastered voice changing software as well, LOL

Rambler wrote:

Casey Anthony movie: Who will play her?
By Hal Boedeker
Staff writer
12:40 p.m. EDT, May 7, 2012
I have never thought of Jeff Ashton and Rob Lowein the same sentence. But the folks at Lifetime have. Lowe will play the former prosecutor in a film based on Ashton's book, "Imperfect Justice."
That movie-star casting suggests that Ashton's opponents won't fare as well. Think of all the character actors who could be drafted to play Jose Baez in the film tentatively called "Prosecuting Casey Anthony." It could be anyone from Joe Pesci to Paul Reubens.
State Attorney Lawson Lamar won't get the Lowe treatment, either. He is more likely to be played by John Ratzenberger than Ted Danson.
And what of Casey herself? Producers would be wise to use news footage of her and just film an unnamed actress from the back when a body is needed.
Rachel Dratch, a"Saturday Night Live" alum, sort of resembles Casey and can pull off the weird faces. She might be too old, but the years haven't been kind to Casey.
Still, I think news footage is the way to go. No one does Casey like Casey.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/...
********
Good idea!
And the various tapes of voicemails or recorded calls made by Richard Grund/Plesea could be also dubbed in so nobody is required to play his various roles either.

MrStaggersHome wrote:

Scrambler's about to slide out of her chair she is so excited.
I'm afraid she will break her mouse copying and pasting so haphazardly.
Don't break her heart by telling her no one reads that nonsense.