Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1417395 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1149687 Jun 11, 2014
harmonious wrote:
'This in turn means the lame duck that all presidents eventually become will start quacking quite soon. "
I thought BO and woodddikkk had something in common. lol
poor hammy. still trying to prove he's a bigger idiot than any non con.

little does he know it's a done deal!

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1149688 Jun 11, 2014
Iraq Wants America Back

Two and a half years after the last U.S. soldier departed, an al Qaeda offshoot is in control of Mosul and headed for Baghdad—and Iraq’s prime minister is requesting U.S. air strikes.
The Daily Beast

Osama is dead and al qaeda is on the run

Il Douche

I guess they all ran to Iraq

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1149689 Jun 11, 2014
Impeach Obama? Fox News analyst says President Obama must go, bad for America
Should the U.S. people impeach Obama over the recent controversy regarding the Bowe Bergdahl swap and other political matters? Impeaching President Obama is what needs to be done, argues Fox News analyst and former Judge Jeanine Pirro this week in a now viral video. The Inquisitr shares Pirro’s…
Examiner.com from RSS
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1149690 Jun 11, 2014
Ah! The brew-skie is good tonight!

Here's to reich wing Brats everywhere!!!

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1149691 Jun 11, 2014
Rahm Emanuel Ribs Hillary Clinton on 'Dead Broke' Comment:'Really?'
Even Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel seemed to be skeptical of Hillary Clinton’s comments about her and her husband’s post-White House financial situation. During an interview in Chicago this morning for her book “Hard Choices,” Emanuel asked Clinton directly about the remarks she made this week...
ABC News

of course we know she's a lying sack of crap, like BO

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1149692 Jun 11, 2014
Rep. Salmon: Mullah Obama 'Hasn't Lifted a Finger' to Help U.S. Marine in Mexico Jail
Rep. Matt Salmon (R-Ariz.) spoke atthe Heritage Foundation'sConversations with Conservativeson June 10, 2014 in Washington,D.C.( CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)( CNSNews.com )– Rep. Matt Salmon (R-Ariz.) said on Tuesday that President Barack Obama’s claim that no members of the U.S. military are “left…
CNS News from RSS

He really loves the troops, doesn't he?

“you know i know”

Since: Oct 07

denver

#1149693 Jun 11, 2014
more ammo to defeat this shreiking harridan

Fact Check: Hillary came up with Benghazi video explanation
Hillary Clinton’s newly released memoir leaves little doubt she was the first member of the Obama administration to publicly link an anti-Islam video to the 2012 Benghazi terror attack – though she does not explain what intelligence she relied on to make the faulty connection. The former secretary…
Fox News from RSS

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1149694 Jun 11, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
BO lies about everything, of course he would lie about Ayers.
We absolutely do not know who this man is. He has vague connections to anti-American organizations and characters who long for America's demise and punishment.

John Case wrote an article in "People's World" stating "reelecting Obama is absolutely essential".

People's World is committed to popularize the ideas of Marxism and Bill of Rights socialism. The websites enjoy a special relationship with the Communist Party USA.

http://www.peoplesworld.org/about-us

http://peoplesworld.org/the-danger-of-a-romne...

Much of his past is cloaked in absolute secrecy and too many questions remain unanswered.

He has surrounded himself with corrupt advisors and politicians and appointed inept heads of departments whose role it is to become his human shields..

History will tell the true story in time. Every single liberal on this site and elsewhere will be ashamed of their gullibility and being so willingly misled.

I sincerely hope they realize it much sooner.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1149695 Jun 11, 2014
Ah! I do enjoy this evening!
TPRTY

United States

#1149697 Jun 11, 2014
Was Brat's Victory About Immigration Amnesty? You Betcha!

Mark Thiessen assured viewers that Brat’s victory was not about amnesty at all, but was an expression of the same anti-establishment sentiment we’ve seen elsewhere this year. He specifically cited Ben Sasse’s victory in the Nebraska Senate GOP primary, and Chris McDaniel’s forcing incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran into a run-off in Mississippi.

Let’s take those:

(1) Ben Sasse was running for an open seat — there was no “establishment” Republican to defeat.

(2) McDaniel has made his opposition to amnesty the centerpiece of his campaign.

We’re 0 for 2, so far. What else you got?

There were, in fact, a couple of tea party challenges this year to so-called “establishment” Republican incumbents such as McConnell and John Cornyn. They both voted against the Schumer-Rubio amnesty.

They both won.

That’s 0 for 4.

Carl Cameron blamed Cantor’s loss on the rain:“It’s worth noting that the weather was foul here yesterday and today as well. So some of it may have been nature helping out David Brat.”

Similarly, the New Yorker explained Cantor’s loss by saying,“Low turnout undoubtedly played a role.”

Sixty-five thousand ballots were cast in the Cantor-Brat contest. That is not a large turnout for a congressional primary election — it’s gigantic. In Cantor’s 2012 primary, 47,037 people voted. In the only other two congressional primaries in Virginia on Tuesday — the day with all that rain!— 38,855 people voted in one and 17,444 in the other.

Every excuse in the book is being trotted out to claim this election was about anything but amnesty. Cantor was “arrogant.” He was “out of touch.” Democrats crossed over to vote for Brat. Cantor was “overconfident.”(Also, the sun was in his eyes!)

It’s all the same boilerplate used to rationalize any election loss. Let’s take one. Overconfident? Are you kidding me? Cantor spent more than $5 million on a congressional primary!

Cantor’s idiotic statements about amnesty lit up talk radio, were denounced daily on major websites such as Breitbart.com , and were the dominant theme of Brat’s campaign, especially in the last few months. The influential Kausfiles.com became a one-man Eric Cantor Rapid Response Team on amnesty.

Brat didn’t just win; he walloped Cantor, 55.5 percent to 44.5 percent.

Still not convinced Brat’s victory was about amnesty? Then tell me why the New York Times ran this headline on Wednesday:“Why Did Cantor Lose? Not Easy to Explain.”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#1149698 Jun 12, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
And speaking of failed foreign policy...
NBC News
June 11, 2014
Following a wave of violence that has seen two major cities fall to insurgent forces, the government of Iraq has asked the United States for air assistance in quelling the uprising by al-Qaeda affiliated militants, U.S. officials confirmed to NBC News on Wednesday.
The White House is mulling several options 'including the possibility of providing 'kinetic support' for the Iraqi military" which is fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, an affiliate of al-Qaeda.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/iraq-asks-u...
Can someone explain to me what "kinetic support" means?
Its a form of jock strap, but first the Iraq army need to find their balls.
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1149700 Jun 12, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Its a form of jock strap, but first the Iraq army need to find their balls.
Maybe once the Iraqi army figures that out they can show the baggers here in America how that works?

“fairtax.org”

Level 8

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1149701 Jun 12, 2014
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
??? What does that have to do with anything except prove my point that 65,000 votes out of a population of 757,917 is very, very small. Especially given the fact that the democrats, in a district that is 43 percent registered democrat, didn't even bother to field a candidate.
"With votes counted in 99 percent of the precincts, 64,418 votes were cast, roughly a 37 percent increase over two years ago. Despite that, Cantor polled fewer votes than he did in 2012 — 28,631 this time, compared with 37,369 then." (Hamptonroads)
You do understand it was a primary, right? You do understand that number includes children not old enough to vote? Good Grief!!!!

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#1149702 Jun 12, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
nothing wrong with subjective evaluations....unless you're a loser.....
After a careful analysis of your posts here I'm afraid you don't meet the minimal standards necessary to participate in the intellectual discussion on Topix.
I'm sorry but we're going to have to replace you with someone that has a brain.

“fairtax.org”

Level 8

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1149703 Jun 12, 2014

“fairtax.org”

Level 8

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1149704 Jun 12, 2014
Nostrilis Waxmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
After a careful analysis of your posts here I'm afraid you don't meet the minimal standards necessary to participate in the intellectual discussion on Topix.
I'm sorry but we're going to have to replace you with someone that has a brain.
Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1149705 Jun 12, 2014
Nostrilis Waxmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
After a careful analysis of your posts here I'm afraid you don't meet the minimal standards necessary to participate in the intellectual discussion on Topix.
I'm sorry but we're going to have to replace you with someone that has a brain.
That just might be a formidable task giving you are dealing with mostly baggers on here. I suspect more difficult than finding those WMDs in Iraq....But I agree it needs to be done.
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1149706 Jun 12, 2014
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!
This would be exhibit A as a counter argument on having a brain. "GOOD GRIEF".

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#1149707 Jun 12, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama has accomplished his goal in Iraq......an Al Qaeda victory......and the humiliation of the US.....
If Bush didn't put us in Iraq with his unnecessary and unprovoked war then America would not be in the position of fighting for an impossible victory, unless you expect American troops to occupy Iraq forever.
This kind of dumbass post is an example of why your evaluation was so poor.
Its been nice knowing you. Bye.
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#1149708 Jun 12, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
"We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of Mankind for Self-government upon the capacity of each and all of us to Govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain
ourselves according to The Ten Commandments of God."
~James Madison
Even though Moses and the Ten Commandments are displayed in numerous prominent places in and around the Supreme Court building, liberals seem to want to sustain ourselves according to power being in the hands of a few.
Later.
Taking that crap out for a stroll again Carol?
The quote you're hanging your premise on comes from David Barton's book The Myth of Separation. Barton gives the following footnote for the quotation:
• Harold K. Lane, Liberty! Cry Liberty!(Boston: Lamb and Lamb Tractarian Society, 1939), pp. 32-33. See also Fedrick Nyneyer, First Principles in Morality and Economics: Neighborly Love and Ricardo's Law of Association (South Holland" Libertarian Press, 1958), pp. 31.
The only problem with the above is, no such quote has ever been found among any of James Madison's writings. None of the biographers of Madison, past or present have ever run across such a quote, and most if not all would love to know where this false quote originated. Apparently, David Barton did not check the work of the secondary sources he quotes.
And no Carol, the Ten Commandments are not depicted numerous places around the Supreme Court. They are depicted once and only partially on the frieze above the south wall where Moses is depicted along with other lawgivers. Moses isn't given any prominent position standing behind Menes and Hammurabi. The tablets that have the Roman numerals I to X on the doors leading to the chamber and above the bench represent the first ten Amendments to the Constitution also known as the Bill of Rights. On the north wall one of the lawgivers depicted is Mohammed so your assertion that the laws of this country are based on Judeo Christian values is totally false.
If you were ever a history teacher, which I highly doubt, you would know that it's in governments that are religiously based that the many are ruled by the few. Only in a truly secular government where all beliefs are treated equally is there true religious freedom.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CASEY: Does the State Have the Goods to Convict? (Mar '10) 1 hr T-REX 513,460
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Into The Night 61,002
Inspiration Lane - Don't Quit (May '09) 3 hr Milee 73,682
loan shark (Dec '11) 3 hr spotcred 32
Hot girl named Sara 13 hr James 3
News Almost one year since gay marriage ruling, LGBT... 16 hr Rose_NoHo 194
two words (Jul '10) 22 hr CJ Rocker 27,860

Orlando Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Orlando Mortgages