I do not support any military action without U.N. backing or, at the very least, without joint involvement of a coalition of nations...including Britain. Period.<quoted text>
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were holed up in caves in the tribal regions. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda and the Taliban are running around the entire country blowing up villages everywhere.
When Bush left office, Al Qaeda was holed up in caves. Since Obama took office, Al Qaeda has established jihad training facilities in multiple countries, and has rebuilt sufficiently to take over countries.
Do you support Obama's intent to get Americans killed helping Al Qaeda acquire the chemical weapons in Syria?
IMO, if Obama allows the warmongers to persuade him to abandon his principles by taking unilateral military action against Syria, he will become a laughing stock. Just because the warmongering republicans have insisted on building up a massive military machine doesn't mean Democrats have to avail themselves of it. We certainly should not be leading an attack on Assad.