Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1405537 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#916266 May 31, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>You are not an elected Congressmen. Congress knows about their fiduciary trust to keep Social Security solvent. You don't know why Social Security is called the 'third rail' and lethal for politicians to mess with it?
A fiduciary trust is a legal contract.

Social Security is no such thing.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#916267 May 31, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>You can't begin to make a good product without capital assets and a good labor force to build it.'If you build it they will come'
Building a product without a market is just what Obama tried with scams like Solyndra, with predictable results.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#916268 May 31, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>You are not an elected Congressmen. Congress knows about their fiduciary trust to keep Social Security solvent. You don't know why Social Security is called the 'third rail' and lethal for politicians to mess with it?
This is why I found it interesting how Paul Ryan used his own mother to "explain" to people how social security would be unaffected.

Little did she know she was lying and I'm sure through no fault of her own.

The R&R railroad team of romney/ryan kept trying to slide the details (such as age cutoffs) by, but lucky the media caught on in a hurry.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#916269 May 31, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Ancillary? LMAO.
=======
"By now, physician practices and medical billing services know a change is coming on October 1, 2013 that will dramatically impact their medical billing and current way of doing business. That of course is the date set by the federal government for full implementation of ICD-10-CM, which will completely replace ICD-9 coding. Transitioning to ICD-10 diagnosis codes will be like learning a new language. Providers will need to be using ICD-10 coding for medical billing on claims based on dates of service from October 1, 2013 going forward–or they WILL NOT GET PAID"
======
"The new ICD-10 diagnosis codes take effect on October 1, 2013, and all healthcare providers are required to comply with the new regulations or they may have trouble with insurance reimbursement. These changes in the medical billing practices are significant enough to have caused marked slowdowns in billing and payment in other countries"
======
"As a medical billing professional, it is essential that you understand the differences between ICD-9 and ICD-10. Repeat after me: ICD-9 is to ICD-10 as VCR is to DVR. In other words, ICD-9 is the old school coding classification system, while ICD-10 is the new kid in town."
=======
"ICD-10 codes are much more specific than ICD-9 codes and this will impact payers who may modify terms of contracts, payment schedules, or reimbursement."
Stupid libturd
Never mind the humongous overhead attached to allowing the federal government to invade our privacy.

Or the likelihood that claims will be denied because the system is too complex, perhaps Obama's way of reducing medical costs.

“Often imitated”

Level 6

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#916270 May 31, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Provide a reputable link to back up sectarian violence in Dearborn-Livonia-Southfield Michigan.
You can't, you're clueless.
The Arab Christian and Muslim community in that area began forming during the early fifties, well before your dumazz was born and there are well over 100 Mosques in that area.
The Dearborn MI Chief of Police is a Arab you stupid sht.
NPR reputable enough for ya? Stupid libturd.

"In Dearborn, Mich., the nation's largest Arab-American community, Shia and Sunnis have long lived together mostly peacefully. But it appears that some of Iraq's sectarian violence is being mirrored in the Detroit area, particularly in recent months. As the Muslim communities have grown and prospered, more mosques have been built and some of the divides between these sects have been brought into sharper focus."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#916271 May 31, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>No news business likes following regulations or being told by the government how they ought to handle their reporters. The government can only hope that newspapers editors will take their advice on being responsible, but when reporters don't act responsibly there isn't much that can be done about it.
Is that your version of the First Amendment?
SHADOW

Bulverde, TX

#916272 May 31, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Good point. Romney didn't care about a select group of Americans because he felt they didn't care about HIM!
Now that's entitlement they spread!
No squats that isn't right.
He was talking about the people who feel Obama's give away programs would be taken away. You know the obammy phones and such.
Who ever brings this country out of the tail spin will be disliked also. Take the candy away and the baby cries.
Obama supporters are just like that.

“Peace on Earth”

Level 4

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#916274 May 31, 2013
Florida wrote:
<quoted text>Defending the IRS and a sellout obama is an excellent campaign strategy you idiot, recommended for all Democrats you fool.
It's the culture...
As I have said before, resorting to childish name calling proves you have nothing in the way of facts to back up your personal opinion.

“Often imitated”

Level 6

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#916275 May 31, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Fake Story About the IRS Commissioner and the White House
White House records show Douglas Shulman signed in for 11 visits, not 157, between 2009 and 2012.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...
You loony left wingers really need to quit believing what other loony left wingers tell you. You know whats even more hilarious, the article you linked to even has a link to show they are lying, but they know you sheep won't follow it.

This link is from your article

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/discl...

now filter by the name "douglas Shulman". you get 157 results. Stupid libturds
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#916276 May 31, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> It's WOOD CHICKS, not wood chips. Friggin' libtards can't read.
LOL! Just bustin' yer chops, don't get yer panties in a bunch!

“Often imitated”

Level 6

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#916277 May 31, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Look, Fox says it was 157, well via the Daily Caller, plus they had this big shiny beautiful graph on the Fox site yesterday so it must be true, graphs don't lie!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/30/fo...
Another stupid sheep. You used to think for yourself. What happened?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/discl...

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Level 4

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#916278 May 31, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
Just one more thought until we meet again...
(later tonight...)
When the New York Times defies their beloved Prince Holder and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Fox News, you know there's trouble in paradise.
In a forest fire, the Liberal Rabbit runs with the Conservative Fox.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#916279 May 31, 2013
SHADOW wrote:
<quoted text>
No squats that isn't right.
He was talking about the people who feel Obama's give away programs would be taken away. You know the obammy phones and such.
Who ever brings this country out of the tail spin will be disliked also. Take the candy away and the baby cries.
Obama supporters are just like that.
lol! Yap! Yap! Yap! Yap! Yap! went little sadow!
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#916280 May 31, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
NPR reputable enough for ya? Stupid libturd.
"In Dearborn, Mich., the nation's largest Arab-American community, Shia and Sunnis have long lived together mostly peacefully. But it appears that some of Iraq's sectarian violence is being mirrored in the Detroit area, particularly in recent months. As the Muslim communities have grown and prospered, more mosques have been built and some of the divides between these sects have been brought into sharper focus."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...
It's bs scumbag, get a life.

Why do you post on the AA forum? What's up with that anyway?

Don't tell me you're over there hassling that cat that posted here a couple of years back.

“Peace on Earth”

Level 4

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#916281 May 31, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Fox News Wallows In What-If World Of Obama 'Scandals'
Never shy about uncorking unprovable, and sometimes laughable, allegations about Obama, the Fox crew in recent days has thrown any semblance of caution to the wind and shifted into conjecture overdrive. Buoyed by the emergence of legitimate administration controversies, and driven by the warped assumption that the president has suffered grave political wounds (polling data confirms he has not), Fox programming now often resembles little more than right-wing bull sessions about pending resignations and shattered second terms.
The irony is there are actual investigations currently underway examining possible wrongdoing within the administration. For instance, it's hard to downplay the significance of the Justice Department's misstep in naming Fox News' James Rosen (or any journalist) as a possible co-conspirator in an FBI request for a search warrant for Rosen's personal emails and phone records.
But Fox News can't be bothered with waiting for official findings and it gets frustrated when criminal cover-ups involving the White House don't emerge.
And that leads to spectacles such as Bernard Goldberg's baseless claim the administration "went after" Rosen simply because he works for Fox News. There's no evidence anyone at the White House knew about, let alone instigated, the FBI probe. And as the Associated Press leak investigation indicates, the administration has not been shy about tracking journalists, regardless of their employer. No matter. It just sounds better when Fox talkers construct a vast conspiracy: Obama personally targeted Rosen!
And how about the completely fact-free interpretation offered up around the clock in recent days that Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress during his May 15 testimony when answering questions about the AP probe?
And remember Benghazi? At the beginning of the month Fox News was, once again, obsessed over it and treated the eight-month-old story of the terror attack on the U.S. diplomatic outpost as the defining scandal of the Obama administration. Despite a mostly news-less Congressional hearing, and despite the fact ABC News' much-touted "exclusive" regarding White House emails about the editing of the Benghazi talking points fell apart, Fox has worked hard to keep the story in the "scandal" trifecta mix.
On May 29, Fox's Charles Krauthammer announced "the biggest scandal of all" revolved around what Obama did the night of the Benghazi attack. Pointing to no actual evidence, Krauthammer suggested that while Americans were still under attack "and fighting for their lives" on September 11, 2011, the president was already plotting an all-consuming White House cover-up.(Fox alum Glenn Beck later jumped into the same leaky boat as Krauthammer.)
That was nothing compared to the charade staged by Fox & Friends when co-host Brian Kilmeade claimed "no one seemed to know where" national security adviser Tom Donilon was the night of the terror attack. Fox News then put up on the screen a photograph of Obama huddling with his top aides in the Oval Office on the night of the Benghazi attack. Featured prominently in the photo with Obama? Tom Donilon.
Today, Fox News remains most animated about the controversy over the IRS's improper scrutiny of conservative groups that applied for tax-exempt status.
With all the evidence indicating the White House was completely uninvolved in the review process, Fox has been happy to try to creatively connect non-existent points in order to expand the controversy so that it encompasses the umbrella claim of ruthless Obama "intimidation."
Rupert Murdoch's new motto is "Passionate. Principled. Purposeful."
"Passionate" in their sensationalism. "Principled" in there own twisted sense of morality and "Purposeful" in their quest for the almighty dollar. Truth be damned.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/29/business/mu...
NJ raider 1

Arlington, VA

#916282 May 31, 2013
I see after all the back & forth, Duck Dodger has struck again. Aunt Betty totally dodged the questions thrown her way today. I'm not surprised.

“Peace on Earth”

Level 4

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#916283 May 31, 2013
are you joking or stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are stupid aren't you? "failing" is just the opposite of a news organization that has held the #1 spot for several years. You want "failing" look at MSNBC ratings! People are apparently getting sick of them covering the truth and leaving out important news just because it doesn't make Obama look good. Apparently people think they deserve better....and Fox has the ratings to prove they are leaving MSM to get it!
Fox's ratings has nothing to do with reporting the truth. It has everything to do with the dumbing down of America and the embrace of reality TV, sensationalism and conflict. Fox is successful for the same reason shows like "WipeOut" are popular...they cater to the less-literate audience. It's just a sad sign of the times.
Lincoln

United States

#916284 May 31, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Just bustin' yer chops, don't get yer panties in a bunch!
Carols list:

6. The Dish Ran Away with the Spoon

7. The Sky is falling
Lincoln

United States

#916285 May 31, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
Even if it's proven beyond any doubt that Shulman's visits to the WH were mostly to someone else besides the president, it is one factor - one layer, if you will - of many layers in three major scandals.
Some of you tend to forget a growing number of Democrats - both in Congress and in the media - are as angered about this as republicans.
Try and keep that in mind in your attempts to deny and dodge Easter Eggs.
When asked about the current Republican Party, reading in between the lines, the Tea Party/conservative wing of the party,

Bob Dole said,

“I think they ought to put a sign on the national committee doors that says closed for repairs until New Year’s Day next year and spend that time going over ideas and positive agendas.”

When asked whether he or Ronald Reagan could make it in today’s Republican Party, Dole responded, I doubt it. And I — Reagan wouldn’t have made it. Certainly Nixon couldn’t have made it, because he had ideas and, we might have made it, but I doubt it. I mean –

A couple of observations–RINOS (Republicans in name only) still are the major force in the legislative body Mr. Dole oversaw: McCain, Graham, Hatch etc., the short list. So yes, Dole (the man who expanded the food stamp program), Reagan or Nixon could still make it in 2013.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#916286 May 31, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>No news business likes following regulations or being told by the government how they ought to handle their reporters. The government can only hope that newspapers editors will take their advice on being responsible, but when reporters don't act responsibly there isn't much that can be done about it.
The real First Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The First Amendment conveys absolutely zero power to the President with respect to freedom of speech. In fact, the First Amendment does not not allow Congress to restrict free speech.

Jean's First Amendment:

"The President shall decide to what extent the people are permitted freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to assemble."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Orlando massacre spurs fear, solidarity among L... 3 hr Abdul Muhaimin 610
News Missing 5-year-old Florida girl likely was abdu... (Feb '09) 4 hr zazz 98,131
CASEY: Does the State Have the Goods to Convict? (Mar '10) 9 hr Murphey_Law 513,416
John E. Aills of Leesburg Bowl 10 hr barTENDER 2
News FDA Signals Relaxing Gay Blood Donation Policy 21 hr Thats Right 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 22 hr dGo mnaDed lyHo i... 60,662
keep a word----drop a word (Feb '11) Wed Princess Hey 19,107

Orlando Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Orlando Mortgages