Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506387 Aug 15, 2013
Rambler wrote:
<quoted text>
"Casey, full glare ahead and adorned in her her gas can red sweater with the henkel silver jacket on top, and George in his “will someone take me seriously” lavender."
http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/03/29/cayleecase...
********
LOL
Adding......

"At the March 3rd motion hearing, where George alledged he was an agent of the State, he faced Casey from the witness stand.

Casey, full glare ahead and adorned in her her gas can red sweater with the henkel silver jacket on top, and George in his “will someone take me seriously” lavender."
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506388 Aug 15, 2013
Posted by Christina Stoy
Tuesday 29 March 2011 4:35 pm

When can their glory fade?

O the wild charge they made!

All the world wonder’d… Tennyson

George sees the light… Baez Light Brigade that is… and yes, I do believe that jurors will think they are all drunk for such a strategy.

Not new, not novel, not nouveau. You have read my predictions that George Anthony will willingly serve up his lily liver with fava beans and a nice chianti, for years.

Well, looks like the bus he is laying down for has left the station.

http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/03/29/cayleecase...

*****

Very witty!

Ngracie how come you didn't see this coming?
GLOOMY DAYS

Los Angeles, CA

#506389 Aug 15, 2013
Helena-Handbasket wrote:
<quoted text>
The only explanation for the hatred Ngrace shows towards old Georgie has to be that she realizes she's the only female the old goat ever rejected.
It's obvious that Scrambled is Cindy because she's given herself away more than once. Besides, we all know how Cindy feels about the Grunds.
Most of the sane posters have left and Scrambled Cindy and Ngrace are still here, trapped in their obsessive and delusional behavior.
You are so right HH - Just a couple of Robotic Luddites who refuse to accept the fact they need Re-Programing due to the fact that the trial is over- KC killed her kid 5 years ago and walked free.

Good Lawd one would think they could find something more useful to do with their lives than spend the past 5 years competing with each other as to who is the smartest - Too bad they fail to realize just how ludicrous they appear to others.

Babble Babble - Blather Blather -LOL!

Level 6

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#506390 Aug 15, 2013
Rambler wrote:
<quoted text>
I changed my opinion about Jesse during the trial, especially after he starred in the Casey Anthony video diary. I don't think it's true at all "the apple didn't fall far from the tree". I think it kicked the rotten stump and never looked back.
http://www.cfnews13.com/content/news/articles...
This link is Casey at her computer...
.........with Morgan's Zaneida Gonzales in a Cameo!*&^%$#@

Jesse did NOT testify at the trial...
Never an appearance in any of the Court Proceedings ...

BUT the Media!!!and Papa Grund on The Nancy Grace Show..

They were both given a pass...when The Grund's were as much
Casey and Caylee's Family as George and Cindy Anthony...

Where were Perry~Mason~Beaz~Ashton~Burdic k~George~Lamar~Demings
and where was "Caylee" when the Grown`Up Screwed`Up...

They must of all been BLINDED by "The Script!"
Good Title for the book hey!

The link above is not an article from CFNEWS13.com
It's a photo of Casey and John Morgan's Zaneida...

You want to change the subject!
8931

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#506391 Aug 16, 2013
Rambler wrote:
Posted by Christina Stoy
Tuesday 29 March 2011 4:35 pm
When can their glory fade?
O the wild charge they made!
All the world wonder’d… Tennyson
George sees the light… Baez Light Brigade that is… and yes, I do believe that jurors will think they are all drunk for such a strategy.
Not new, not novel, not nouveau. You have read my predictions that George Anthony will willingly serve up his lily liver with fava beans and a nice chianti, for years.
Well, looks like the bus he is laying down for has left the station.
http://blinkoncrime.com/2011/03/29/cayleecase...
*****
Very witty!
Ngracie how come you didn't see this coming?
See what coming?

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#506392 Aug 16, 2013
Rambler wrote:
<quoted text>
Duh, of course the duct tape would no longer be "across the face" or in the exact same place as it had been originally applied because the skin it would have originally attached to had dompletely decomposed.....but the duct tape was still attached to the hair.
Regardless if the duct tape was the actual cause of death or it was used to silence the child, it's obviously a critical element of the murder. As much as you'd like to believe the State is required to prove when and how a death occurred, you know you're only fooling yourself.
The duct tape was "caught up" on one side of the hair mat, which was laying underneath the skull.

Where that duct tape was originally placed, and for what purpose, is pure speculation.

The duct tape is not "a critical element of the murder" (as far as the case against Casey) for two rather basic reasons:

1- Caylee's cause of death could not be determined, therefore your conclusion that she was "murdered" was never proven.

2- As the original placement of the duct tape could not be determined, the only "critical element" is the fact that the rare Henkel duct tape can be connected to George on at least 2 of the 3 times it appeared in the case, and ZERO times to Casey.

As Meatloaf sang: "Two Out Of Three Ain't Bad".

As to this portion of your post :"As much as you'd like to believe the State is required to prove when and how a death occurred, you know you're only fooling yourself", I know the State is NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED to prove these issues, but I also know that they sure as hell had better at the very least, proffer something to indicate how and when.

Common sense, Rambler.......going by your interpretation of the law, any person can be charged with any offense at any time, which completely erodes the basic right of everyone to provide an alibi of their whereabouts at the time and place the alleged offense was committed.

AND, to be charged with any offense, the State sure as hell had better provide what the actual offense is that they are alleging.

We saw that truth to be self evident in the State of Florida vs Casey Marie Anthony. The jurors were tasked with determining if her child was murdered, which they could not as the State provided no credible evidence that a murder was committed, and even if they could prove it was murder, they could not prove by whom, when, where, and how.

If you go back and listen to LDB's opening statement, you will see this is fact.

SaAlNwKaAys

Norman Park, GA

#506393 Aug 16, 2013
Lawdy ngrace I thought you were in prison.

When did you get out?
GLOOMY DAYS

Los Angeles, CA

#506394 Aug 16, 2013
SaAlNwKaAys wrote:
Lawdy ngrace I thought you were in prison.
When did you get out?
Too bad so very sad that the Analtees did not live in Scotland when their spawn KC killed her kid.

Had this been the case then each of the 3 competitive Robotic fuxups could have vied for the position of Procurator Fiscal in order to prosecute Papa Jo and the dreaded Grunds.

NOTE..
The Procurator Fiscal (PF or Fiscal) works for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) that is responsible for prosecuting crime in Scotland. They are also responsible for investigating sudden or suspicious deaths, and complaints against the police.

And 'complaints against the police' would have been that which ng excels in.

Unfortunately the Orlando Kid Killer did not slaughter her kid in Scotland where the verdict would have been Not Proven - But was instead turned over to 12 Pinella inbreds who simply agreed that she was 'Not Innocent' thus allowing her to hide out for the next 25 years - Whereby she will grow more black blobs, pendulous breasts- gelatinous thighs and get a job in the Freak Show next time the Carnival comes to ??????
Who knows where she will be living by then- I suspect that she will be living in the home of her now deceased Granma who she stole from.

Cindy probably had the garage sale in order to prepare the happy homestead for her.

“Let the farce be with you”

Level 2

Since: Aug 13

Pottsylvania

#506395 Aug 16, 2013
SaAlNwKaAys wrote:
Lawdy ngrace I thought you were in prison.
When did you get out?
LOL

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#506396 Aug 16, 2013
SaAlNwKaAys wrote:
Lawdy ngrace I thought you were in prison.
When did you get out?
About the same time as you did.

“Let the farce be with you”

Level 2

Since: Aug 13

Pottsylvania

#506397 Aug 16, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
About the same time as you did.
It was funnier the first time.
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506398 Aug 16, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
See what coming?
George, that he was going to be the focus of the defense theory, prior to the trial.
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506399 Aug 16, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
The duct tape was "caught up" on one side of the hair mat, which was laying underneath the skull.
Where that duct tape was originally placed, and for what purpose, is pure speculation.
The duct tape is not "a critical element of the murder" (as far as the case against Casey) for two rather basic reasons:
1- Caylee's cause of death could not be determined, therefore your conclusion that she was "murdered" was never proven.
2- As the original placement of the duct tape could not be determined, the only "critical element" is the fact that the rare Henkel duct tape can be connected to George on at least 2 of the 3 times it appeared in the case, and ZERO times to Casey.
As Meatloaf sang: "Two Out Of Three Ain't Bad".
As to this portion of your post :"As much as you'd like to believe the State is required to prove when and how a death occurred, you know you're only fooling yourself", I know the State is NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED to prove these issues, but I also know that they sure as hell had better at the very least, proffer something to indicate how and when.
Common sense, Rambler.......going by your interpretation of the law, any person can be charged with any offense at any time, which completely erodes the basic right of everyone to provide an alibi of their whereabouts at the time and place the alleged offense was committed.
AND, to be charged with any offense, the State sure as hell had better provide what the actual offense is that they are alleging.
We saw that truth to be self evident in the State of Florida vs Casey Marie Anthony. The jurors were tasked with determining if her child was murdered, which they could not as the State provided no credible evidence that a murder was committed, and even if they could prove it was murder, they could not prove by whom, when, where, and how.
If you go back and listen to LDB's opening statement, you will see this is fact.
Your words are wasted on me because the Prosecution never put much effort into convicting "the loving mother" of murder.

"The jurors were tasked with determining if her child was murdered....."

Is there a reason you're losing your toehold on reality?
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506400 Aug 16, 2013
tribe mom wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Yes, we can agree on some things. You know my opinion might not be popular, but I would like nothing better than to think this young girl did not kill her child, but in my heart of hearts I think she did. That doesn't make her guilty. It is just my opinion. I think her whole family has been shattered by this heinous crime, and that is where the shame lies.

ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
You pretty much summed up the way I, too, feel...except in my heart of hearts, I don't think she did this on some days, and just the opposite, on other days. But as you said, that's just an opinion...it's the facts coming out during the Trial that will get rid of what we feel and prove what is the truth. The truth, as being, what is proven in Court....the truth, if she is acquitted of the 1st Degree Murder charge, will always be an unanswered question.

She will be convicted....on the lesser charges at least....how could she not?
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/orlando-fl/TB...

********

"The truth, as being, what is proven in court......the truth, if she is acquitted of the 1st Degree Murder charge, will always be an unanswered question".......has morphed into "the truth is Casey's acquittal proved Caylee was not murdered".

The other possibility is ngracie has dementia.

“Let the farce be with you”

Level 2

Since: Aug 13

Pottsylvania

#506401 Aug 16, 2013
SaAlNwKaAys wrote:
Lawdy ngrace I thought you were in prison.
When did you get out?
Sanka!
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506402 Aug 16, 2013
Hmmmm......not sure what to make of this....

State of Florida versus Anthony, Casey Marie
07/07/2011
4. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE:MISSING PERSON OR FELONY
06/15/2008 (FDM) 837.055
5. FALSE INFO TO LEO RE:MISSING PERSON OR FELONY
06/15/2008 (FDM) 837.055
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/default.aspx
******

Notice Counts 6 and 7 are no longer listed as being heard, nor are the two counts 5 and 7 recorded as being reversed on appeal?

But the biggest shocker is the date of 06/15/2008 would be the date the offense occurred - which just happened to be FATHER'S DAY -- according to the storyline the day before Caylee went missing and a month before the disapprearnce was reported to LE.

Is the new Clerk of the Court sifting through fabricated records and correcting them? I don't think this date of the lying offense was originally recorded as occurring on FATHER'S DAY because somebody would have noticed it.

“Let the farce be with you”

Level 2

Since: Aug 13

Pottsylvania

#506403 Aug 16, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
About the same time as you did.
What were you in for?

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#506404 Aug 16, 2013
Rambler wrote:
<quoted text>
George, that he was going to be the focus of the defense theory, prior to the trial.
Yes and no and maybe. But I had no idea about the accidental drowning.

I knew for certain something big was happening in chambers after that infamous March hearing, though, and posted it.(It's in the archives on this thread).

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#506405 Aug 16, 2013
Spooky Mulders wrote:
<quoted text>
What were you in for?
Bad spelling. I stick with spell check now.

And you?
Rambler

Red Deer, Canada

#506406 Aug 16, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes and no and maybe. But I had no idea about the accidental drowning.
I knew for certain something big was happening in chambers after that infamous March hearing, though, and posted it.(It's in the archives on this thread).
You had no idea about the accidental drowning theory until the trial but yet you claim you are the original ngrace?

Well you certainly blew that impersonation out of the water. LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min USAsince1680 1,173,518
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 21 min Barack the Yellow 50,428
Inspiration Lane - Don't Quit (May '09) 39 min Maggie McGee 70,791
Nude photos get Umatilla fire chief in trouble (Jan '08) 2 hr OFDmedic 96
Let's Chat (Jan '12) 9 hr Miles 17,834
Randy Mcalpin VP Orlando Nissan 12 hr NOT CURIOUS ANYMORE 12
5000 post wins (Feb '13) 12 hr Princess Hey 4,377
Orlando Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Orlando People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:10 pm PST

NBC Sports10:10PM
Jerramy Stevens arrested on suspicion of DUI
NBC Sports 2:47 PM
Bucs dip into college ranks for new quarterbacks coach
Bleacher Report 5:36 PM
Breaking Down Mariota vs. Jameis Debate
Bleacher Report 6:29 PM
Which Mariota Flaws Concern Scouts Most
NBC Sports 5:48 AM
Bajakian's NFL bolt leaves hole for Vols, continued search for Chips