They ALL said June 9th, initially. That story didn't change until the night before the bond hearing when LE confronted George and Cindy with the pix taken on June 15th at the nursing home, when Caylee was in Cindy's care.<quoted text>
Of course the focus was on Casey!!! George said she walked out of the house with Caylee on June 9th planning to return the next day and one month later that's the last he saw of his missing granddaughter who until that time lived with him and Cindy. What would you expect but that Casey would be the focus (according to the storyline) since she had been lying to them about where she worked, where she went and who was the nanny who she left Caylee with?
If a grandfather's panic and alarm when speaking with LE who are investigating the disappearance of his 2 year old granddaughter which involve events pertaining to his daughter's secretive and unusual behaviour that clearly do not add up is "suspicious" to you, that's indicative of something wrong with you, not him!
And there's no "of course" the focus was on Casey, until she couldn't get the script right to LE. The ONLY thing all the stories have in common is, Casey said she had an alive Caylee in her care when she dropped her off at Sawgrass Apartments.
The spin started then and there.
George testified on October 14th, 2008, before the Grand Jury; Casey didn't.
Interesting, isn't it, that their indictment lists the dates of "sometime between JUNE 15th and July 16th."?