Yes, another very big question to the UNsigned bankruptcy case that is never asked is why would a defendant with a court approved financial indigent status later file bankruptcy listing dozens of witnesses, attorneys, and even a couple of prosecutors that she is financially obligated to....because it raises obvious allegations of corruption.<quoted text>
The Bankcruptcy is NOT about CREATING a DEBT while she was INCARCERATED...Unless she worked for the Department of Correction and earned MILLIONS...The Creditor's demands are questionnable to say the least...when there are charges of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Casey Anthony case and in Violation of The Federal Mising Child Search Act of 1990 aka Suzanne Law..
The Sources of the Debt's are BOGUS..The Trustees in my Opinion have no right to bypass the 5th DCA's upcoming Decision's
It's as if setting the wagon before the horses...
Horses don't PUSH Horses PULL..
and the Trustee is Pushy..
Sounds like he's working for the Medialaw!...
who continue to CONTRADICTED the Court's Ruling
when a Jury declared Casey Anthony NOT GUILTY...
Where's The BEEF?????
Why is Casey Anthony Charged $800K for a Crime she did NOT Commit...She was incarcerated for 3 years Plus...
Because They want to make sure they get a "Piece of the Pie?"
Or Control Casey?
Didn't the MEDIA make Billions?
GREED will get them nowhere......
I don't see Judge May agreeing to this Nonsense...
It's ANTI-CONSTITUTIONNEL..Casey is a FREE WOMEN!
But the highlighted focus of the bankruptcy has already gotten spun into the same theme song which was prevalent throughout the civil suits -- "Casey being forced to tell her story", even though the burden of proof was always placed with ZG, TM or RK to prove their cases, and bankruptcies involve financial affairs only. Although we are to believe the lawsuits were never settled, Casey's legal team deemed she is legally obligated to each, by identifying the parties as creditors.
Same shit, different day!