Comments
450,461 - 450,480 of 486,572 Comments Last updated 27 min ago
T-REX

Chico, CA

#483528 Jan 18, 2013
I actually despice Men who do not support thier Kid's,it isnt the kids fault they are here it's the parent's fault.
But on the other side of the coin, there are to many mother's who get child support and never give thier kids anything,they spend the support on thier boyfriend's,I remember several years ago reading where a man had his ex in court for just that, he had rlocted to a different state due to his job,he had all the documented child support paymen's reciept's never missed on, he cme back to visit his kids and was shocked they were dirty,torn shoes,terrible non fitting clothes,and had nothing for any kind of entertainment inside the house no Tv,video etc.
So he started checking on his ex, she had a very good paying job and he was paying child support and also paying his wife a couple thousand a month per court order.
the Pi he hired had found out his ex had a boyfriend,who didnt work ever and she had bought him a new truck, and new clothes and every toy he wanted and never evn took the kids to a doctor when they were sick.his Pi was backed up by neighbor's and friends.
Never did here the final outcome though.
I think the point is the court's should have documentation from Mother's in some cases as to where they are spending the child support,of course the ACLU would be all over that.
AN other

United States

#483530 Jan 18, 2013
Same Location wrote:
<quoted text>We waived all child support. The judge didn't like it at all, but it can be done.
Your decency has been obvious long before this revelation.

I suspect that cindy threatened to get custody of Caylee and force casey to pay child support. Imagine how many people would have realized all casey's lies if cindy took her to court for child support.
T-REX

Chico, CA

#483531 Jan 18, 2013
Mary NY wrote:
<quoted text>
RIP Rexy, I will miss ya!
Hi MNY, am I in danger,should I wear a bullet proof cvest, should I drive a tank there for saftey.Lol

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#483532 Jan 18, 2013
Rambler wrote:
<quoted text>
Notice if you ask ngraciie a question that's disproves her accidental-drowning theory, it goes ignored?
In her world apparently it is quite rational for a father who was at the scene of an accidental drowning to frame his daughter for murder by implicating himself with duct tape.
What is it you'd like to ask? I'm here now, so have at it.

As to your "conclusion", yes, I do find it based upon what's in actual evidence, that it is entirely possible that that is what happened. And to both you and DAYS, who challenge my opinion as being a hypothetical opening statement theory only and should not be taken for the truth, I beg to differ. Baez offered this during opening statements, true, but he also says in his book that he didn't take it as the truth until he researched it. I have done the same and I, too, find it very plausible, based upon the facts of the case.

However, when I have tried to point out those facts. I've been attacked, so I have decided to just stay away from that subject,(as was the intended result).

And once again, I'm not related to, or even know, any of the players in this entire saga. I'm just someone who believes that Casey did not hurt her child and would very much like to find out who put her daughter's body in those woods.

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#483534 Jan 18, 2013
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi MNY, am I in danger,should I wear a bullet proof cvest, should I drive a tank there for saftey.Lol
just don't go, she seems schizophrenic

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

New York

#483533 Jan 18, 2013
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi MNY, am I in danger,should I wear a bullet proof cvest, should I drive a tank there for saftey.Lol
All of the above...LOL
T-REX

Chico, CA

#483535 Jan 18, 2013
Finally someone is charging the parents's::

NEW YORK (Reuters)- The mother of a 7-year-old New York City student who brought a handgun to his school in a book bag on Thursday has been arrested on multiple weapons possession and endangerment charges, police said on Friday

Maybe if they would start arresting parent's there would be less 14-15-16-12- year old kids out on the streets with stolen guns or a home weapon commiting roberry,murder and mayhem.

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#483536 Jan 18, 2013
AN other wrote:
<quoted text>
For the public that wasn't involved in reading the discovery, watching HLN or watching the trial ( like the Pinellas 12), this will be their first exposure to the details of the case.
Their first exposure to details of the case as can be crammed into 2 hours, minus commercials, that is.

After watching the other Lifetime movie about the "details" in the Drew Peterson case, I somehow think this 2 hour expose, will not be an enlightenment on any level.

Level 6

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#483537 Jan 18, 2013
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi MNY, am I in danger,should I wear a bullet proof cvest, should I drive a tank there for saftey.Lol
Funny..lol

I don't bite!

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#483538 Jan 18, 2013
Same Location wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know, Mon, as a grandparent raising two grandchildren...I don't understand why Cindy didn't sue for custody. She really had all the power when it came to Caylee, she supported her. Casey had no means to properly take care of Caylee, that was easy to prove.
I'll never get past Cindy not going for custody of Caylee.
Interesting comment. The answer could be obvious, or maybe not so much.

But if you look at the dynamics, the fact that it seemed to be a constant power struggle in that family, should have at least been a prime motivator to do so.

Cindy's co-workers said she told them she couldn't afford to pursue it....but it can be done for free through the courts, so I don't buy this as the excuse. I think it was more because Cindy had nothing to base her claims upon. Meaning, Casey never committed any acts that the courts would deem as reprehensible enough to strip her of her parental rights.

jmo
T-REX

Chico, CA

#483540 Jan 18, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
What is it you'd like to ask? I'm here now, so have at it.
As to your "conclusion", yes, I do find it based upon what's in actual evidence, that it is entirely possible that that is what happened. And to both you and DAYS, who challenge my opinion as being a hypothetical opening statement theory only and should not be taken for the truth, I beg to differ. Baez offered this during opening statements, true, but he also says in his book that he didn't take it as the truth until he researched it. I have done the same and I, too, find it very plausible, based upon the facts of the case.
However, when I have tried to point out those facts. I've been attacked, so I have decided to just stay away from that subject,(as was the intended result).
And once again, I'm not related to, or even know, any of the players in this entire saga. I'm just someone who believes that Casey did not hurt her child and would very much like to find out who put her daughter's body in those woods.
I disagree as usual NG.
Baez could research till time dissapeared and could not possible find evidence of any kind that Caylee drowned ever and neither can you. It's quite impossible to find evidence of something that never happened.
LDB was correct with her analisises, Caylee would have been found floating in the swimming pool, not inside a laundty bag and two garbage bags and in a swamp

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

New York

#483539 Jan 18, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
What is it you'd like to ask? I'm here now, so have at it.
As to your "conclusion", yes, I do find it based upon what's in actual evidence, that it is entirely possible that that is what happened. And to both you and DAYS, who challenge my opinion as being a hypothetical opening statement theory only and should not be taken for the truth, I beg to differ. Baez offered this during opening statements, true, but he also says in his book that he didn't take it as the truth until he researched it. I have done the same and I, too, find it very plausible, based upon the facts of the case.
However, when I have tried to point out those facts. I've been attacked, so I have decided to just stay away from that subject,(as was the intended result).
And once again, I'm not related to, or even know, any of the players in this entire saga. I'm just someone who believes that Casey did not hurt her child and would very much like to find out who put her daughter's body in those woods.
Then why hasn't she? I will tell you why, because she murdered her. She didn't drown in the family pool. You don't believe Casey's story? Caylee drowned and her daddy covered it up? Why make an accident look like murder? Why!? Baez is a liar that writes his own book reviews.

If she wanted to find out who put her daughter's dead body in the woods she would have gone to the media for help, she would have cooperated with LE to help find her. She would have helped her parents in their quest to find Caylee. Instead she lied and played everyone and I mean everyone. She dragged that child from one mans bed to another. She ditched her every chance she could with her parents so she could live the life she wanted.

Level 6

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#483541 Jan 18, 2013
REMEMBER CAYLEE wrote:
<quoted text> just don't go, she seems schizophrenic
Would'nt that make T-Tex a WIMP beleiving a cyber You vs
finding out for himself!

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#483542 Jan 18, 2013
Murphey_Law wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny..lol
I don't bite!
Who are you kidding! You're still sitting on the grassy knoll in Dallas Circa 1963..........Don't do it T REX!

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#483543 Jan 18, 2013
AN other wrote:
<quoted text>
If cindy was granted custody:
Who was going to take care of Caylee when cindy and George were working?
Who was going to pay for daycare for Caylee?
For all purposes, cindy had custody of Caylee and she didn't have to pay for daycare. From the financial information about George's debts, casey's thefts, the cell phone issues, the bankruptcy, Lee helping financially and threats of foreclosure, there wasn't any money for daycare in their budget.
Financial apathy? Could be.

It could also explain JA's comment:

"When a case gets this much attention, the real tragedy can get lost in all of the hype and drama. The story is now and always has been about a little girl and how people who should have loved her above all else found ways to put other priorities above her."

http://www.mylifetime.com/movies/prosecuting-...

STM

“Your talk is cheap”

Level 8

Since: Feb 09

Your lies are weak

#483544 Jan 18, 2013
OT

Just got off the phone with my daughter. Starting Tuesday my Grandsons school is going to be patrolled by armed guards.

I think even tho it is protecting our children, Its a sad day in my life that society has sunk this low!! I'm dismayed, and my daughter doesn't understand why=(

This will prolly set a few off here, but why cant we just put God back in the schools!
AN other

United States

#483545 Jan 18, 2013
ngrace wrote:
<quoted text>
Their first exposure to details of the case as can be crammed into 2 hours, minus commercials, that is.
After watching the other Lifetime movie about the "details" in the Drew Peterson case, I somehow think this 2 hour expose, will not be an enlightenment on any level.
I'll have to take your word for it. I have never watched that channel before. However, I suspect that few people had the opportunity to watch the trial and this will be their first exposure. The movie is advertised as being 3 hours long ony cable system though.

STM

“Your talk is cheap”

Level 8

Since: Feb 09

Your lies are weak

#483546 Jan 18, 2013
AN other wrote:
<quoted text>
Your decency has been obvious long before this revelation.
I suspect that cindy threatened to get custody of Caylee and force casey to pay child support. Imagine how many people would have realized all casey's lies if cindy took her to court for child support.
What I don't understand, "IF" Caylees bio dad was dead, why wasn't $INdy all over collecting SSI for her?

“SWOT KEEPS DAIZEYGAY”

Level 4

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#483548 Jan 18, 2013
AN other wrote:
<quoted text>
Your decency has been obvious long before this revelation.
I suspect that cindy threatened to get custody of Caylee and force casey to pay child support. Imagine how many people would have realized all casey's lies if cindy took her to court for child support.
Point well taken BUT what if Sin threatened to take the LMOTY to court and the LMOTY revealed that there was a pedOHphile with a pet mouse residing in the household and upon telling her Mama- the only response she got was " No wonder you're such a whore."

Could this be why during a Jail interview KZee told her LM

' I haven't said anything'

Is the Bald Mouse now in a WPP awaiting the Grund Murder Trial?

Level 7

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#483547 Jan 18, 2013
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
Off Tpic here NG:
Are you still having the problem with Topix kicking off on IE, I had the same problem till I read the article the other day where the goverment advise people to remove Java fro thier computer's, I did and it cured the problem,a hacker did get into my e-mail,I was informed imediatly by my ISP and they went through my system and had me put the necessary protection in place. heck they sent a trashy type advertisment for product's ( medicinal like type add) to my neighbor at 3 ;22 am, Hell my computer wasn't even on and I was sawing logs at that time,heck the only time I would be at that hr is to PEE
OT:
Yes, T-REX, still having numerous problems with Topix. I've been trying to get further info on Java....last I heard, it's versions 7 and above. I have never updated my version from #6, so I think I'm okay leaving it installed. I also read that it was only applicable to Java Script, which I can't seem to find located on my PC......all I can find is simply Java.

My security is constantly monitoring applications....which is a pain to deal with, but I'm assuming is protecting me from any hijack attempts. I did have my email "contact list only" hacked a few months ago and it caught it after the fact.

What I'm trying to find out, and can't is, will my PC work correctly if I do disable it completely and if not, wouldn't I then be forced to re-install it, thus taking a bigger risk?

As to Topix, yes, I get kicked off the site due to malicious scripts. Topix doesn't seem to care, as I did notify them about this problem and they didn't address it.

Please keep me posted on what you find out.

Thanks.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min Incognito4Ever 1,100,164
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 18 min SpaceBlues 46,313
China Sees Growth in a Web of Fast Trains (Feb '10) 1 hr RayH 3
The alphabet (Jun '06) 5 hr Doug77 1,047
Let's Chat (Jan '12) 8 hr The Real Missy 17,627
What life is like for Casey Anthony 10 hr Rambler 192
Privilege Waived - Part II . . . Remember Me? 14 hr Lon Spector 29
•••
•••
•••

Orlando Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Orlando People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Orlando News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Orlando
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••