Then why hasn't she? I will tell you why, because she murdered her. She didn't drown in the family pool. You don't believe Casey's story? Caylee drowned and her daddy covered it up? Why make an accident look like murder? Why!? Baez is a liar that writes his own book reviews.<quoted text>
What is it you'd like to ask? I'm here now, so have at it.
As to your "conclusion", yes, I do find it based upon what's in actual evidence, that it is entirely possible that that is what happened. And to both you and DAYS, who challenge my opinion as being a hypothetical opening statement theory only and should not be taken for the truth, I beg to differ. Baez offered this during opening statements, true, but he also says in his book that he didn't take it as the truth until he researched it. I have done the same and I, too, find it very plausible, based upon the facts of the case.
However, when I have tried to point out those facts. I've been attacked, so I have decided to just stay away from that subject,(as was the intended result).
And once again, I'm not related to, or even know, any of the players in this entire saga. I'm just someone who believes that Casey did not hurt her child and would very much like to find out who put her daughter's body in those woods.
If she wanted to find out who put her daughter's dead body in the woods she would have gone to the media for help, she would have cooperated with LE to help find her. She would have helped her parents in their quest to find Caylee. Instead she lied and played everyone and I mean everyone. She dragged that child from one mans bed to another. She ditched her every chance she could with her parents so she could live the life she wanted.