KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473319 Dec 14, 2012
Maybe Mr. Dillingham would like a copy of the "modified" impound document sent to his law office, so he can explain the "general theory of law" behind it?
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473320 Dec 14, 2012
REMEMBER CAYLEE wrote:
<quoted text>I wasn't distracted by any of that either but I learned in kindergarten that 1 + 1 = 2
Then you should know.....

FBI TESTIMONY + NO EVIDENCE = ACQUITTAL
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473321 Dec 14, 2012
WAS sanka wrote:
<quoted text>
The jury was focused on getting out.
They focused on Baez's bull chit story and didn't bother to listen to any real evidence.
The only "real evidence" is that which the FBI testimony affirms doesn't link to Casey or anyone in her family.

Casey is factually innocent.
Diane Ax

United States

#473322 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
The only "real evidence" is that which the FBI testimony affirms doesn't link to Casey or anyone in her family.
Casey is factually innocent.
Casey is also actually innocent.

I'm waiting and watching.

:D

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#473323 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, Einstein, I did consider that someone didn't have an impound form on hand so they modified an existing one.
Which is itself the whole problem.
Casey's car wasn't impounded by law enforcement.
It was a 100% private tow transaction from start to finish.
There shouldn't be a law enforcement impound record, AT ALL, much less a "modified" impound form.
The trunk was also "modified", since it didn't have a stench until after it was on the tow lot.
Coincidence?
Such uncivil and insulting communication guarantees that I will never again reply to any of your questions.
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473324 Dec 14, 2012
Oh? Like a human sacrifice? She "sent the child home", did she? What a cruel and evil woman!

"Jailhouse snitches Robin Lunceford and Pamela Graham are expected to testify later in the trial, which is scheduled to last several more weeks.
Lunceford is expected to testify that Graham told her she killed Rilya because the little girl was evil."

*** You probably recall Robin Lunceford from the Casey Anthony case, regarding the jailhouse letter scandal.

If Lunceford is a credible witness in the Rilya Wilson case -- so too is she a credible witness in the Casey Anthony case.

To refresh your memory, Robin Lunceford reported that Maya Derkovich confessed to her that the Maya & Robyn Adams tried to frame Casey with those jailhouse letters.

It certainly wouldn't surprise me one bit - but a jailhouse snitch IS a jailhouse snitch.
How much credibility do you give a jailhouse snitch?

More than you give the Maya's & Robyn Adams', I suppose.

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#473325 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain the altered OCSO impound form that shouldn't have ever existed in the first place?
Why don't you explain it for the class, and I mean FACTS and not one of you wacky conspiracy theories :-)

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#473326 Dec 14, 2012
DillinghamLawFirm wrote:
<quoted text>
Such uncivil and insulting communication guarantees that I will never again reply to any of your questions.
I knew you were intelligent :-)

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#473327 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you should know.....
FBI TESTIMONY + NO EVIDENCE = ACQUITTAL
Then you should know that acquittal does not = innocent, and while I have your attention, there is no need to shout at me. I can read :-)

STM

“Happy Fall”

Level 8

Since: Feb 09

~~~~~Y'all~~~~~

#473328 Dec 14, 2012
Nuthutters46er wrote:
<quoted text>
Who's stalking? I'm just trying to connect with an old acquaintance.:)
Oh, you mean you're playing your pretend to be someone you're not game again, and creaming in your pants I bet. SMFH
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473330 Dec 14, 2012
DillinghamLawFirm wrote:
<quoted text>
Such uncivil and insulting communication guarantees that I will never again reply to any of your questions.
:laughs uncontrollably:

That's okay because I could easily tell you weren't prepared to tackle the issue of fabricated evidence. Much less with me.

You are a little out of your league, counselor.

I figured I would gently insult you to give you an out, to let you save face in front of your new Topix friends.
It worked like a charm.

Who said I can't predict outcomes?
T-REX

Chico, CA

#473331 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Pay attention. They didn't say verbatim that Casey didn't do it.
The totality of their testimony was such that they ALL BUT danced on the Judge's bench to declare "CASEY DIDN'T DO IT!"
They stopped just short of doing that. They didn't have to do that.
Obviously the jury "got it" just by simply listening intently to the FBI witnesses testimony.
The jurors weren't distracted by talking heads, forums, blogs and journos.
They were 100% FOCUSED on what the FBI had to say.
Had you been 100% FOCUSED on what the FBI had to say -- you might understand the verdict.
:)
""Obviously the jury "got it" just by simply listening intently to the FBI witnesses testimony"'

Liar::

The Jury spokesman stated they didnt say she was quilty,but they thought there wasnt enough evidence to convict.
And the real reason for thier decision is the fact they were to damn ignorant to understand the evidence the state did present ( which was way more than enough both circumstantial and forensic),and the fact they were more interested in how much money they would be making off thier TV interviews.
But like Casey,they are resigned to hiding like rat's for fear of thier inaility to weigh the evidence honestly.
I still say that brolin was ther for one reason, to get all the names of the juror's and investigate thier criminal possability's and thier relatives also,with many of those jurors relatives in the Pen with Brolin's husband,it wouldnt take much influence to have the jury find her innocent.
Diane Ax

United States

#473333 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
:laughs uncontrollably:
That's okay because I could easily tell you weren't prepared to tackle the issue of fabricated evidence. Much less with me.
You are a little out of your league, counselor.
I figured I would gently insult you to give you an out, to let you save face in front of your new Topix friends.
It worked like a charm.
Who said I can't predict outcomes?
He'd never be able to handle Tannenbaum.
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473334 Dec 14, 2012
REMEMBER CAYLEE wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you explain it for the class, and I mean FACTS and not one of you wacky conspiracy theories :-)
The FACTS are:

1- The Pontiac was towed by Johnson's towing on June 30, 2008, under a private tow agreement between Amscot and Johnson's.
The documents and testimony support that FACT.

2- The Pontiac was retrieved on July 15, 2008 from Johnson's towing, by the lawful owners, who assumed the financial obligation for the PRIVATE TOW & STORAGE.
The documents and testimony support that FACT

3 - There were no witness statements - law enforcement narrative summaries - affidavits -- search/seize warrants - law enforcement vehicle release documents - or any testimony to suggest that OCSO impounded Casey's vehicle - or assisted in the removal of the PRIVATE TOW - or completed an altered impound form on June 30, 2008.
This FACT is also supported by the documents and the testimony.

If you grasp the complexity that 1+1=2 -- then you can grasp the FACT that a document from an unrelated 2007 impound, bearing white out correction fluid and filled back in with the Pontiac's information, dated June 30, 2008 -- is fabricated evidence in a missing person's case.

It shouldn't be that difficult for someone with your kindergarten intelligence to know when a document is woefully out of place.
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473335 Dec 14, 2012
Diane Ax wrote:
<quoted text> He'd never be able to handle Tannenbaum.
Oh, hell naw!

Tannebaum would chew his lilly liver up and spit it out by breakfast.

“Picasso”

Level 7

Since: Feb 10

Calla Lilies

#473336 Dec 14, 2012
KC H8TRS R DOLTS wrote:
<quoted text>
The FACTS are:
1- The Pontiac was towed by Johnson's towing on June 30, 2008, under a private tow agreement between Amscot and Johnson's.
The documents and testimony support that FACT.
2- The Pontiac was retrieved on July 15, 2008 from Johnson's towing, by the lawful owners, who assumed the financial obligation for the PRIVATE TOW & STORAGE.
The documents and testimony support that FACT
3 - There were no witness statements - law enforcement narrative summaries - affidavits -- search/seize warrants - law enforcement vehicle release documents - or any testimony to suggest that OCSO impounded Casey's vehicle - or assisted in the removal of the PRIVATE TOW - or completed an altered impound form on June 30, 2008.
This FACT is also supported by the documents and the testimony.
If you grasp the complexity that 1+1=2 -- then you can grasp the FACT that a document from an unrelated 2007 impound, bearing white out correction fluid and filled back in with the Pontiac's information, dated June 30, 2008 -- is fabricated evidence in a missing person's case.
It shouldn't be that difficult for someone with your kindergarten intelligence to know when a document is woefully out of place.
As the counselor stated, it could be that the officer didn't have one handy and used the existing one,but to get to the real truth why don't you call them and find out instead of insinuating or just stf up about it.
KC H8TRS R DOLTS

United States

#473337 Dec 14, 2012
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
""Obviously the jury "got it" just by simply listening intently to the FBI witnesses testimony"'
Liar::
The Jury spokesman stated they didnt say she was quilty,but they thought there wasnt enough evidence to convict.
And after all that fabrication of evidence & crime staging, too.

Waste......huge waste.

“God Bless the A's ”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#473338 Dec 14, 2012
there is a shooting going on at a Connecticut elementary

“God Bless the A's ”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#473339 Dec 14, 2012

Level 1

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#473340 Dec 14, 2012
T-REX wrote:
<quoted text>
""Obviously the jury "got it" just by simply listening intently to the FBI witnesses testimony"'
Liar::
The Jury spokesman stated they didnt say she was quilty,but they thought there wasnt enough evidence to convict.
And the real reason for thier decision is the fact they were to damn ignorant to understand the evidence the state did present ( which was way more than enough both circumstantial and forensic),and the fact they were more interested in how much money they would be making off thier TV interviews.
But like Casey,they are resigned to hiding like rat's for fear of thier inaility to weigh the evidence honestly.
I still say that brolin was ther for one reason, to get all the names of the juror's and investigate thier criminal possability's and thier relatives also,with many of those jurors relatives in the Pen with Brolin's husband,it wouldnt take much influence to have the jury find her innocent.
This is a common misconception. Juries do not find people "innocent" in Florida. The only allowable verdicts are "Guilty" and "Not Guilty."

Ms. Anthony was not found to be "innocent." The State did not carry its burden of proof, so the jury found her "not guilty."

Innocence is not an issue for juries. Consider that a person may be charged with a crime that has four prongs of evidentiary proof, but if the State can only prove three prongs (or elements) of the crime, then the jury must find the defendant not guilty. That in no way shows innocence.

The biggest hurdle the State faced in the Anthony case was cause of death. With no trauma to the child's skeletal remains and no evidence of how the child died, the case was doomed. That essential prong was missing.(Yes, I know Dr. G. testified that the child died by homicide. Juries, though, are not bound by expert opinions and are free to disregard them--something most people do not understand).

Was Ms. Anthony "innocent"? I don't know, and that is not for the criminal justice system to decide.

Had Ms. Anthony testified, though, that the child drowned, choked on a sandwich, or that she was otherwise there when the child died, I'm of the opinion that she would have certainly been convicted of a lesser crime. Ms. Anthony is not a doctor, and the State would have righteously argued that these days, modern medicine can save people (particularly children) when they are clinically dead, and Ms. Anthony's failure to call 911 was negligence per se, and exposed her to at least an involuntary manslaughter charge.

Since Ms. Anthony did not testify, the jury was foreclosed from considering that avenue, since there was no testimony in evidence of that issue.

I gave Ms. Anthony a 75% chance of prevailing at trial. The issue that concerned me was jury nullification simply because there was a dead child involved. Such cases can turn very bad very quickly for defendant's, and I don't think Ms. Anthony would testify well on her own behalf. Frankly, I think the state would have made mincemeat out of her.

Additionally, Mr. Baez promised testimony in his opening arguments about sexual abuse that he never delivered. To lawyers, that is an extreme violation, but to juries, not so much. Mr. Baez's Discovery violations, too, were anathema to me.

Yet as Dad always said, "You can't argue with winning."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 25 min Grey Ghost 1,128,979
Rick Scott - before you vote 2 hr Florida voter 1
Missing 5-year-old Florida girl likely was abdu... (Feb '09) 2 hr King George 96,529
Let's Chat (Jan '12) 2 hr janeschinhair 17,720
Change one letter game (Sep '11) 9 hr Princess Hey 2,557
Alphabet Game (Apr '12) 9 hr Princess Hey 9,124
New Game ***Last Word + 2 (Oct '11) 9 hr Princess Hey 11,976
Orlando Dating
Find my Match

Orlando People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Orlando News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Orlando

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]