Scientists say they have proved clima...

Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus...

There are 8137 comments on the Hartford Courant story from Dec 9, 2008, titled Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus.... In it, Hartford Courant reports that:

Scientists studying the changing nature of the Earth's climate say they have completed one crucial task - proving beyond a doubt that global warming is real.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hartford Courant.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#8079 Mar 14, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' never had upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa...... & no science or mathematics beyond that.'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has had errors of 3000 TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 1 million TIMES, & 72 million TIMES.
He IS good at repetition, as was pointed out above...:)
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8080 Mar 14, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Why is it then the deniers like him? Because he's their boss.
Remember how tina adores him.
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#8081 Mar 14, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
...>>No, climate change is the central issue. As I've said repeatedly, you deliberately confuse the issue in order to further your Denier agenda.
If you weren't advocating climate change mitigation, we wouldn't have any disagreement. Climate always changes, climate change mitigation hasn't even been tested.

.
tha Professor wrote:
>>Performing an experiment taking in the entire world is "hugely difficult," as I'm sure even you would admit. Which is why you choose such an 'experiment," so that you can mock climate change, climate science, and efforts to mitigate global warming. Very dishonest of you.
No, I don't believe climate change mitigation by restricting CO2 emissions or sequestering greenhouse gas isn't "hugely difficult"; I believe its impossible. There are no published experimental tests that show its even remotely possible.

I'm not mocking purely observational climate science; I'm mocking climate change mitigation and man made climate catastrophe alarmism.

.
tha Professor wrote:
>>Link to support your claim?...
The first link is from Fair Game:
http://www.picotech.com/experiments/global/gl...

GHere's two more:
http://www.espere.net/Unitedkingdom/water/uk_...

http://www.beloit.edu/sepm/Geology_and_the_en...

This page has been taken down:
http://dcdc.asu.edu/K-12Education/greenhousel...
litesong

Everett, WA

#8082 Mar 14, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
Either way there is nothing to gain by trying to correct his errors.
But I love to type that "brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver" made math errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, & 73 million TIMES.
dr spark

AOL

#8083 Mar 14, 2013
global warming ,.....
the latest soup of the day
--10 years from now ,....
it will be something else
SpaceBlues

United States

#8084 Mar 14, 2013
dr spark wrote:
global warming ,.....
the latest soup of the day
--10 years from now ,....
it will be something else
Because you will be in the soup!

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#8085 Mar 14, 2013
dr spark wrote:
global warming ,.....
the latest soup of the day
--10 years from now ,....
it will be something else
Something else like:
Loss of farmland to aridity? Salt water intrusion? Altered or intensified weather patterns? Time will tell.
dr spark

AOL

#8086 Mar 14, 2013
it was all about " global cooling " 25 years ago ,

what will it be in 2024 ?

anybody's guess,...
a nuclear Iran will probably cause massive fallout and millions will be dead ,...
who will get hit first ? America or Israel
the global warming myth keeps the sheep-ple dumb and pre occupied -
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8087 Mar 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Why is it then the deniers like him? Because he's their boss.
Remember how tina adores him.
Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8088 Mar 15, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' never had upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa...... & no science or mathematics beyond that.'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has had errors of 3000 TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 1 million TIMES, & 72 million TIMES.
More diarrheas from the “pinheadlitesout”

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#8089 Mar 15, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Yo, spacedoutblues would that be the same NASA that made the USA space hitchhikers??
Congress did that. Are you a Paul Broun supporter now, PHD? Brain_D is.

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#8090 Mar 15, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you weren't advocating climate change mitigation, we wouldn't have any disagreement. Climate always changes, climate change mitigation hasn't even been tested.

>>Humans are changing the climate through the greenhouse effect, and reducing greenhouse gases would mitigate that effect. A child could understand at least that simple fact, and yet you continue to obfuscate, evade, and try to change the subject. Why?

<quoted text>No, I don't believe climate change mitigation by restricting CO2 emissions or sequestering greenhouse gas isn't "hugely difficult"; I believe its impossible. There are no published experimental tests that show its even remotely possible.
I'm not mocking purely observational climate science; I'm mocking climate change mitigation and man made climate catastrophe alarmism.

>>Changing the subject again? I told you that performing experiments on a world-wide scale was "hugely difficult." Please don't try to pretend I said something else and argue against that, instead - that technique is called using a strawman argument. And you've already had many, many experiments cited for you showing how greenhouse gases affect atmospheric warming, so why pretend that warming is 'alarmism?" You seem wildly irrational and in denial, citing "beliefs" instead of facts.

<quoted text>The first link is from Fair Game:
http://www.picotech.com/experiments/global/gl...
GHere's two more:
http://www.espere.net/Unitedkingdom/water/uk_...
http://www.beloit.edu/sepm/Geology_and_the_en...
This page has been taken down:
http://dcdc.asu.edu/K-12Education/greenhousel...

Why are you citing this evidence to me, when it contradicts YOUR claims?

“Stop the Brain Rot”

Since: Jan 12

Take a Looonng Vacation

#8091 Mar 15, 2013
dr spark wrote:
it was all about " global cooling " 25 years ago ,
what will it be in 2024 ?
anybody's guess,...
a nuclear Iran will probably cause massive fallout and millions will be dead ,...
who will get hit first ? America or Israel
the global warming myth keeps the sheep-ple dumb and pre occupied -
It hasn't been about "global cooling" any time recently, that is a bit of Denier misinformation.

Unless, as you suggest, there were an all-out nuclear exchange which brought on the 'nuclear winter' effect. But then, your implication that Iran would attack either the U.S. or Israel is specious if not absurd.
SpaceBlues

United States

#8092 Mar 15, 2013
dr spark wrote:
it was all about " global cooling " 25 years ago ,
what will it be in 2024 ?
anybody's guess,...
a nuclear Iran will probably cause massive fallout and millions will be dead ,...
who will get hit first ? America or Israel
the global warming myth keeps the sheep-ple dumb and pre occupied -
No, it was not. The rest of your post is also false.

Did you know:

Bullies’ accomplices suffer similar levels of distress as victims, finds study

Read more: http://www.canada.com/life/Bullies+accomplice...
litesong

Everett, WA

#8093 Mar 15, 2013
dr spark wrote:
it was all about " global cooling " 25 years ago .....
Instead of reading Time & Newsweek on the sly at a local magazine rack, you should have enrolled at University & read Science Journals at Earth science, geology, astronomy, & mathematics libraries at the colleges.

Of course, you are wrong. In the 70's, 44 Science Papers were published in Science Journals about global warming, whereas only 7 papers were written about global cooling. Science, itself, was already predicting the problems of AGW.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8094 Mar 15, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Instead of reading Time & Newsweek on the sly at a local magazine rack, you should have enrolled at University & read Science Journals at Earth science, geology, astronomy, & mathematics libraries at the colleges.
Of course, you are wrong. In the 70's, 44 Science Papers were published in Science Journals about global warming, whereas only 7 papers were written about global cooling. Science, itself, was already predicting the problems of AGW.
More diarrheas from the “pinheadlitesout”
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#8095 Mar 15, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress did that. Are you a Paul Broun supporter now, PHD? Brain_D is.
No, I don't support any of those fools. So congress did it because it was a profitable venture?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#8096 Mar 15, 2013
tha Professor wrote:
>>Humans are changing the climate through the greenhouse effect,
Yet, no experimental evidence shows our greenhouse gas emissions are able to change climate temperature. As each greenhouse gas molecule is added to the atmosphere, it has less warming effect than the previous molecule.

.
tha Professor wrote:
and reducing greenhouse gases would mitigate that effect. A child could understand at least that simple fact, and yet you continue to obfuscate, evade, and try to change the subject. Why?
Again, no experimental test proves tha Professor's claim above.

.
tha Professor wrote:
>>Changing the subject again? I told you that performing experiments on a world-wide scale was "hugely difficult." Please don't try to pretend I said something else and argue against that, instead - that technique is called using a strawman argument. And you've already had many, many experiments cited for you showing how greenhouse gases affect atmospheric warming, so why pretend that warming is 'alarmism?" You seem wildly irrational and in denial, citing "beliefs" instead of facts.
None of the studies cited shows the effect of man made greenhouse gas on atmospheric temperature. That's how you can know climate change mitigation is a hoax.

.
tha Professor wrote:
Why are you citing this evidence to me, when it contradicts YOUR claims?
You asked me to cite my claim: "There are several experiments demonstrating the greenhouse effect, they tend to show a far lower CO2 forcing than the IPCC's most conservative estimates." The experiments I cited in my previous post prove the greenhouse effect is weak and our greenhouse gas contributions are insignificant.
SpaceBlues

United States

#8097 Mar 15, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Yet, no experimental evidence shows our greenhouse gas emissions are able to change climate temperature. As each greenhouse gas molecule is added to the atmosphere, it has less warming effect than the previous molecule.
.
<quoted text>Again, no experimental test proves tha Professor's claim above.
.
<quoted text>None of the studies cited shows the effect of man made greenhouse gas on atmospheric temperature. That's how you can know climate change mitigation is a hoax.
.
<quoted text>You asked me to cite my claim: "There are several experiments demonstrating the greenhouse effect, they tend to show a far lower CO2 forcing than the IPCC's most conservative estimates." The experiments I cited in my previous post prove the greenhouse effect is weak and our greenhouse gas contributions are insignificant.
Listen. Submit your nonsense to publication to compete with the scientists.

Leave us alone.

P.S. You have spammed the world about 40,000 times with your nonsense. Go compete with science in proper arena.
SpaceBlues

United States

#8098 Mar 15, 2013
To Topix Editors:

I for one will be very upset if you reward the above poster's 40,000 spam posts.

Sincerely,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min JRB 1,547,802
CASEY: Does the State Have the Goods to Convict? (Mar '10) 39 min Mary NY 513,189
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 63,843
The Inspirational Millionaire - An Orlando Risi... 15 hr Inspirationalmill... 1
Rising star in the Luxury - High End Market 15 hr Inspirationalmill... 1
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... Wed Frankie Rizzo 1,096
News Missing 5-year-old Florida girl likely was abdu... (Feb '09) Wed King George 98,415

Orlando Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Orlando Mortgages