Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 62314 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49612 Aug 27, 2014
Our climate has accumulated

2,134,828,113

Hiroshima atomic bombs

of heat since 1998
factcheck

New London, CT

#49613 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Climate science is not easy like mud building, LOL. It is interdisciplinary, if you could fathom that.
Obviously, you have not been exposed to huge mathematical models and billions of data input. If you pull a stunt like you suggest, the whole crashes, DUH.
It is a good thing that you could not be educated and trained to become a climate scientist; you would have been highly unsuccesful in everything you did... thus you are who you are.
It must suit your personality to follow the crowd. The terminology used by your sacred IPCC is "highly likely" that climate has been influenced, and more precisely, dominated by anthropogenic sources. When it comes to the science of weather (which is how one defines trends in climate) a rating of highly likely is about the equivalent of saying 1 out of 3 tosses wins. Not even fifty-fifty! If you were so deeply (and honestly which of course you are not) concerned/afraid of the impending doom you sure as hades wouldn't live in a location that is only a few feet above sea level you'd surely pack up and head for the hills, but wait the sea isn't rising locally right? Sea level rise will occur elsewhere because as the Earth warms it changes shape and Houston will not see flooding. If the sea were rising it would happen more quickly at the onset and the rate would decay with time. This is because the surface area of the allegedly melting ice is larger now and shrink as it melts. But wait this isn't happening? Fifteen to twenty percent of the way into the catastrophic process and all that waterfront property is still the same distance above the waterline? How can that be? Oh you mean you can't explain it? Try please. We need more than a false prophet on this thread. Where are the goods? Also, please make it clear so that you don't cause lifesong to have a total mental breakdown (or at least don't worsen the obviously acute condition that they already suffer). Thanks in advance for your forthcoming "brilliant" dissertation.
truth-facts

Delaware, OH

#49614 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Our climate has accumulated
2,134,828,113
Hiroshima atomic bombs
of heat since 1998
Your an embarrassment.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49615 Aug 27, 2014
truth-facts wrote:
<quoted text>Your[sic] an embarrassment.
Are you crying?

BWAHAHAHA
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#49616 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you crying?
BWAHAHAHA
As I noted before... "Either way, discussion devolves quickly into sandbox taunts. "

Grow up sonny.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#49618 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Our climate has accumulated
2,134,828,113
Hiroshima atomic bombs
of heat since 1998
which goes to show how insignificant man is. on a global scale.....that amounts to a gnat fart compared to the amount that hits earth daily from the sun.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49619 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you crying?
BWAHAHAHA
Crying?
I LMAO at your insanity. Go get your head checked.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49620 Aug 27, 2014
truth-facts wrote:
<quoted text>
Crying?
I LMAO at your insanity. Go get your head checked.
Wow.. you are still crying to cover up your own embarassment.

Fortunately, you are not qualified to diagnose on topix. Just be pesponsible for your posts' content.

Back up, LOL.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49621 Aug 27, 2014
responsible
Hey dude

Corona Del Mar, CA

#49623 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Our climate has accumulated
2,134,828,113
Hiroshima atomic bombs
of heat since 1998
Hey troll boy, I visited Hiroshima 2 years ago. It's not a bad place. A little pricey, maybe.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#49624 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow.. you are still crying to cover up your own embarassment.
Fortunately, you are not qualified to diagnose on topix. Just be pesponsible for your posts' content.
Back up, LOL.
And now the equivalent of "I'm rubber, you're glue..."

Geez. For your sake you better be 16... but I'm guessing 34.

What a loser.

And a DENIER.

And a hypocrite.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49625 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow.. you are still crying to cover up your own embarassment.
Fortunately, you are not qualified to diagnose on topix. Just be pesponsible for your posts' content.
Back up, LOL.
The "HYPOCRITE" opens it's mouth and all is better.
Fortunately we know your not qualified as well. You've proven that time and time again with your falsified data and horsesht so-called expert articles. You can't even muster an original thought.
Babble boy you keep on truckin,thinking your someone,when actually,YOUR INSIGNIFICANT!!!!!!!!

Bwa ha ha!!!!!!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#49626 Aug 27, 2014
factcheck wrote:
<quoted text>
And if you believe that you are more of a clown than the guy who thinks that the amount of energy in the Earth system is constant.
Calibration is worthless if the instrument is not verified to measure precise reference values. It is not a random process as it appears some of your thoughts may be. You don't calibrate to an unknown point because then there is a no reference to measure from. GGAM!
What you denier scammers quickly forget is the big heat spike in 98 and the world has been cooling ever since remember ?. Which of you decided that the 98 averages were the norm ?
The fact is the 98 spike was always homogenized into the real data trend which still shows an upward trend which makes the 98 spike irrelevant. It also applies to the Australian weather bureau bringing spikes into line with all data.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49627 Aug 27, 2014
Our climate has accumulated

2,134,922,504

Hiroshima atomic bombs

of heat since 1998
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49628 Aug 27, 2014
I dedicate this post to the mentally-deranged deniers on this page of the forum..

Draft Of Upcoming IPCC Report Presents Stark View Of The Future As Climate Change Rages On

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/26/un-p...
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49629 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Our climate has accumulated
2,134,922,504
Hiroshima atomic bombs
of heat since 1998
And it disappeared like a fart in the wind.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49630 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
I dedicate this post to the mentally-deranged deniers on this page of the forum..
Draft Of Upcoming IPCC Report Presents Stark View Of The Future As Climate Change Rages On
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/26/un-p...
IPCC
Huffblowhole
UN
Space Nuts
Corrupt/lying commie/socialist entities.
My dedication to you Jr. will be flushed down the urinal.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#49631 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
I dedicate this post to the mentally-deranged deniers on this page of the forum..
Draft Of Upcoming IPCC Report Presents Stark View Of The Future As Climate Change Rages On
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/26/un-p...
From all evidence, YOU are the biggest DENIER!

Why do you hate your "science"?

Hypocrite.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#49632 Aug 27, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
Our climate has accumulated
2,134,922,504
Hiroshima atomic bombs
of heat since 1998
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49633 Aug 27, 2014
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

"Trolling" redirects here. For other uses, see Troll (disambiguation).

For a Wikipedia essay on the topic, see meta:What is a troll?


In Internet slang, a troll (/&#712;tro&#650;l/,/ &#712;tr&#594;l/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[4]

This sense of the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, but have been used more widely. Media attention in recent years has equated trolling with online harassment. For example, mass media has used troll to describe "a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."[5][6]

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Sunnier 1,458,295
Inspiration Lane - Don't Quit (May '09) 3 hr Milee 73,749
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 12 hr YIM 7,942
CASEY: Does the State Have the Goods to Convict? (Mar '10) 16 hr Murphey_Law 512,863
News Missing 5-year-old Florida girl likely was abdu... (Feb '09) 20 hr zazz 98,271
News Hollywood hospital administrator quits after li... (Jul '08) Sun Catpeople 268
News Should men wear pantyhose for warmth? It's not ... (Jan '09) Sat TRUMANS Treason 234

Orlando Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Orlando Mortgages