Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 63619 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46428 May 5, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>. Only that the potential is there because of a more energetic atmosphere due to global warming.
Facts not innuendo........
that's innuendo......and a long stretch at best.

lol

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46429 May 5, 2014
co2 is vital to life. that's a fact.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#46430 May 5, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
CO2 emissions from fossil fuels have added about 21 billion tons of new atmospheric CO2 per year...Facts not innuendo........
Only if you take an extremely short term view; in the long run that CO2 came from the atmosphere in the first place. We're only putting it back in the air, where it belongs.

We are the carbon balance.

Level 1

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#46432 May 5, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Only if you take an extremely short term view; in the long run that CO2 came from the atmosphere in the first place. We're only putting it back in the air, where it belongs.
We are the carbon balance.
And when the CO2 was in the atmosphere all those millions of years ago, the US of A would have been a hot arid desert, the poles would hace been tripical and sea level would hace been 70m higher, all with a weaker sun.

Yes folks, brian is insane.

The question is, why doesn't that bother the deniers here?

(Don't bother with an answer: because they're really just trolls, I know that.)
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#46433 May 5, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
co2 is vital to life. that's a fact.
Again you have no facts. CO2 is just the most common source of carbon in photosynthesis. It is not itsefl necessary to life. Supplly glucose and oxygen and voila, life without CO2.

But that is probably too deep for an idiot like you.

And it is a rather feeble argument in the first place. Water is more essential to life yet you can drown in it, even plants (see flooded forests).

So do you have any INTELLIGENT arguments or are you just going to repeat stupid claims?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#46434 May 5, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Only if you take an extremely short term view; in the long run that CO2 came from the atmosphere in the first place. We're only putting it back in the air, where it belongs.
We are the carbon balance.
Sure dullard, if you wish to go back to the Earth conditions when that occurred.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#46435 May 5, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>that's innuendo......and a long stretch at best.
lol
Explain why that is a long stretch. But of course you do not understand weather dynamics. You have avoided answering the questions once again. Why am I not surprised?

Where are your facts that global warming is not happening? Where are your facts that CO2 is not a significant GHG? Where are your facts that man isn't responsible for the run up of CO2 in the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial revolution?

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46436 May 5, 2014
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you have no facts. CO2 is just the most common source of carbon in photosynthesis. It is not itsefl necessary to life. Supplly glucose and oxygen and voila, life without CO2.
But that is probably too deep for an idiot like you.
And it is a rather feeble argument in the first place. Water is more essential to life yet you can drown in it, even plants (see flooded forests).
So do you have any INTELLIGENT arguments or are you just going to repeat stupid claims?
educate yourself fool!!
you claim co2 isn't vital to life?!?!
are you that stupid?
water and co2 are critical and required for life, dumazz!
make some more stupid claims, son!! you're truly clueless and hilarious at the same time.
http://www.biocab.org/carbon_dioxide_CO2.html

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46437 May 5, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Where are your facts that global warming is not happening? Where are your facts that CO2 is not a significant GHG? Where are your facts that man isn't responsible for the run up of CO2 in the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial revolution?
where have i ever claimed global warming isn't happening? climate has always heated and cooled....it's a natural process for our planet!!! it's just your man made variety i question, son!!
the fact is that co2 is a minor trace gas.
http://www.familyfirst.org.au/files/Thompson-...
man has some responsibility in co2 increases, but less than natural emissions.....which makes fossil fuels even less significant! what's not to like? do you deny that there are tremendous benefits for increased co2??
you people bring up the industrial revolution as if that is your slam dunk case for temp rises. correlation isn't causation, son. you can't quantify how much of the increase in co2 is due to man during this time period anyway. you just promote your hoax and lie a little, don't you?
don't live in fear....the earth will be greener if you people just shut up and enjoy the benefits.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#46442 May 5, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>where have i ever claimed global warming isn't happening? climate has always heated and cooled....it's a natural process for our planet!!! it's just your man made variety i question, son!!
the fact is that co2 is a minor trace gas.
http://www.familyfirst.org.au/files/Thompson-...
man has some responsibility in co2 increases, but less than natural emissions.....which makes fossil fuels even less significant! what's not to like? do you deny that there are tremendous benefits for increased co2??
you people bring up the industrial revolution as if that is your slam dunk case for temp rises. correlation isn't causation, son. you can't quantify how much of the increase in co2 is due to man during this time period anyway. you just promote your hoax and lie a little, don't you?
don't live in fear....the earth will be greener if you people just shut up and enjoy the benefits.
Nuthin' like crawfishin' is there? Did you read the link I gave you? Probably not because it is in variance with your innuendo. Try to keep up. These things have been explained to you numerous times but apparently either you are too stubborn or stupid to understand the facts.
litesong

Everett, WA

#46443 May 5, 2014
[QUOTE who="lyin' brian"]We win, by a wide margin.[/QUOTE]

"lyin' brian", with its errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, 73 million TIMES, 2.5+ trillion TIMES, & 3.5+ trillion TIMES, proves it has no way of calculatin' anything correctly.
litesong

Everett, WA

#46445 May 5, 2014
motheaten wrote:
....... 2014 tornado count about half of normal
Fewer individual days seem to have tornadoes. With excess AGW energy in the atmosphere, weather may be having a more difficult time organizing conditions to create tornadoes. However, there are more days that have 30+ tornadoes, showing that once tornado conditions are meant, more energy is tapped to create multiple tornadoes.

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46446 May 5, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuthin' like crawfishin' is there? Did you read the link I gave you? Probably not because it is in variance with your innuendo. Try to keep up. These things have been explained to you numerous times but apparently either you are too stubborn or stupid to understand the facts.
which link are you talking about, numnutz? the ones full of innuendo?

here's some bright news to any additional co2....former 'wastelands' now have a chance to grow and support life!

what's not to love about co2????

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/...

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46447 May 5, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuthin' like crawfishin' is there?
huh???? never cared for that....but i do love eatin' some mudbugs......with a co2 injected cold beer, of course!!
litesong

Everett, WA

#46448 May 5, 2014
Our Pacific Northwest has few tornadoes. However, a few years ago, I got some pix of a funnel cloud that was about 6-7 miles away. Yesterday, a 70-75mph wind storm(first thought to be a tornado) hit 2 towns from us(causing minor damage, altho several trees were knocked over). Generally, our days are not windy. But it does appear, we have extra wind, that wasn't as consistent 40+ years ago.
bait

Chambersburg, PA

#46450 May 5, 2014
hook line ad sinker

“BET DAP”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#46451 May 5, 2014
litesong wrote:
Our Pacific Northwest has few tornadoes. However, a few years ago, I got some pix of a funnel cloud that was about 6-7 miles away. Yesterday, a 70-75mph wind storm(first thought to be a tornado) hit 2 towns from us(causing minor damage, altho several trees were knocked over). Generally, our days are not windy. But it does appear, we have extra wind, that wasn't as consistent 40+ years ago.
in the big scheme of things....there have probably been thousands upon thousands of tornadoes in what is now know as the pacific northwest, myopic simpleton.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#46452 May 6, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>Where are your facts that CO2 is not a significant GHG?
Measured in parts per million... yeah... that's significant.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#46453 May 6, 2014
litesong wrote:
Our Pacific Northwest has few tornadoes. However, a few years ago, I got some pix of a funnel cloud that was about 6-7 miles away.
Quit taking pix of you flushing your toilet... 6-7 inches away.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#46454 May 6, 2014
One way adjustments: The Latest Alteration to the U.S. Climate Record

On Thursday, March 13, 2014, the U.S. National Climactic Data Center switched to gridded GHCN-D data sets it uses to report long term temperature trends – with a resulting dramatic change in the official U.S. climate record. As seems to always happen when somebody modifies the temperature record, the new version of the record shows a significantly stronger warming trend than the unmodified or, in this case, discarded version.

The new dataset, called “nClimDiv,” shows the per decade warming trend from 1895 through 2012 for the contiguous United States to be 0.135 degrees Fahrenheit. The formerly used dataset, called “Drd964x,” shows the per decade warming trend over the same period to be substantially less – only 0.088 degrees. Which is closer to the truth?

As will be illustrated below in the side by side comparison graphs, the increase in the warming trend in the new data set is largely the consequence of significantly lowering the temperature record in the earlier part of the century, thereby creating a greater “warming” trend.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/29/one-way...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orlando Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Earl 1,534,229
Let's Chat (Jan '12) 41 min Jane 19,228
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... 49 min Eagle 12 329
News Residents learn how to deal, get rid of iguanas (May '09) 6 hr Bye bye 33
News 'Casey Anthony: An American Murder Mystery' rev... 12 hr Lon Spector 165
News Going to a garage sale? A few rules (Jun '09) Sun pissed off 22
Go Trump. Sun Bye bye 1

Orlando Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Orlando Mortgages