Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.
Comments
38,221 - 38,240 of 45,913 Comments Last updated 10 hrs ago
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40647
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I know our resident deniers are USA-centric, so, don't look now, but there are three gigantic cyclones in the Southern Hemisphere right now.

Our Atlantic season being slower than usual doesn't mean there's no climate change.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40648
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Speaking of man-made climate change.. "The federal government's research agencies have been largely shuttered, with scientists sent home and projects shelved," it read. "There are five Nobel Prize-winning researchers currently working for the federal government, all of whom are world-renowned scientists and leaders in their field. Four of them are currently furloughed and unable to conduct their federal research on behalf of the American public due to the government shutdown."

Among the agencies mentioned, the National Science Foundation has had it the worst. Ninety-eight percent of its employees have been furloughed, and the organization has not issued any new scientific research grants. The NSF funds non-medical science and engineering research and education programs across the country.

The National Institutes of Health, the nation's top medical research facility, has lost almost three-quarters of its staff, forcing it to turn away most new patients from its studies. Funding for the NIH became a focal point of debate early in the shutdown when reports emerged that children with cancer were being denied entry into potentially life-saving studies.

The majority of Americans may feel the greatest impact, however, from the cuts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Two-thirds of its personnel have been sent home, and as flu season begins, influenza monitoring has been cut back, according to the White House.

Still, the CDC will continue its most important role in monitoring any imminent threats to the public's health, and most flu vaccines are produced by private companies.[cnn]
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40649
Oct 13, 2013
 
Level 1

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40650
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the researchers (Trenberth) states the uptake of heat in the deep oceans will result in a rise in sea level beyond that which occurs from ice melt. This logically means that melt rate estimates are likely in error due to the failure of incorporating thermal expansion resulting from the assumed deep ocean heating.
Let's see if we can unpick some your misunderstandings here.

Ice melt is not estimated from sea level rise- it is measured by satellites.

Sea level also increases as the oceans warm- at any depth. This is already known.

The budget must close- this is true.

Sea level rise must equal expansion due to warming plus ice melt volume.

The thermal expansion in the deep ocean was not incorporated in previous sea level budgets, but those budgets didn't close.

Sea level was more than expansion due to warming plus ice melt volume.

If sea level rise had equalled expansion due to warming plus ice melt volume, and the figure for expansion due to warming had increased, then you would have to assume either the ice melt data were in error, or doubt the deep ocean warming.

But because the budget didn't close, thermal expansion due to deep ocean warming actually explains the observed sea level rise better, and gives more confidence to observations of ice melt.
Recent sea level rise has so far been difficult to fully explain: satellites measure global sea level rise since 1993 to be about 3.1 mm/year. The warming and expanding 'upper ocean', or the top 700 metres measured by ships and buoys can explain 1.2 mm/year whilst the water added by melting snow and ice can be estimated from satellite gravity measurements for ice sheets and other methods for smaller glaciers, and is about 0.85 mm/year.

Simple addition of the numbers above (1.2 + 0.85 mm/year = 2.05 mm/year) shows that the result from the upper ocean thermal expansion and addition of water mass is still about 1 mm/year short of the observed 3.1 mm/year sea level rise. However, some previous studies have had these numbers quite close to each other when the uncertainties in the estimates have been considered.

....

The model simulations give a sea level rise of 1.1 mm/year from the thermal expansion of the deep ocean. When that is added to the 2.05 mm/year calculated above, the result (3.15 mm/year) is remarkably close to the observed rise of 3.1 mm/year (which more accurately is 3.11 mm/year).
http://www.skepticalscience.com/deep_ocean_wa...
Level 1

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40651
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
So how much of the past 17 years of sea level rise is from thermal expansion and how much is due to ice melt and glacial calving?
Logically; old estimates of ice melt (and subsequent sea level rise) could not be correct if the "missing" heat was not a factor in their calculations.
Your thoughts?
I think you should do some basic reading on the subject rather than advertising and gloating in your ignorance and misunderstanding.

http://ibis.grdl.noaa.gov/SAT/SeaLevelRise/do...
Joe

Chatsworth, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40652
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

My great grandfather used to record temps back in 1920-1935. He said they drank wine and often made up temps for the log book. He said it was "close enough" for government work. Said everyone did it.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40653
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Joe wrote:
My great grandfather used to record temps back in 1920-1935. He said they drank wine and often made up temps for the log book. He said it was "close enough" for government work. Said everyone did it.
Name names, dates,.. otherwise you are an annoying liar..

You posted the same tale more than once.. as if you could pass the smell test; you don't so far.

LOL everyone??
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40654
Oct 13, 2013
 
names include personal, government, and location names..
dont drink the koolaid

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40655
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
Speaking of man-made climate change.. "The federal government's research agencies have been largely shuttered, with scientists sent home and projects shelved," it read. "There are five Nobel Prize-winning researchers currently working for the federal government, all of whom are world-renowned scientists and leaders in their field. Four of them are currently furloughed and unable to conduct their federal research on behalf of the American public due to the government shutdown."
Among the agencies mentioned, the National Science Foundation has had it the worst. Ninety-eight percent of its employees have been furloughed, and the organization has not issued any new scientific research grants. The NSF funds non-medical science and engineering research and education programs across the country.
The National Institutes of Health, the nation's top medical research facility, has lost almost three-quarters of its staff, forcing it to turn away most new patients from its studies. Funding for the NIH became a focal point of debate early in the shutdown when reports emerged that children with cancer were being denied entry into potentially life-saving studies.
The majority of Americans may feel the greatest impact, however, from the cuts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Two-thirds of its personnel have been sent home, and as flu season begins, influenza monitoring has been cut back, according to the White House.
Still, the CDC will continue its most important role in monitoring any imminent threats to the public's health, and most flu vaccines are produced by private companies.[cnn]
Yes, and some of these scientist are saving the world from CAGW! Now they sit at home instead of working to save the planet. So sad that we are doomed because of this government shutdown because scientific advancements to solve the malady of CC is not considered essential.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40656
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Name names, dates,.. otherwise you are an annoying liar..
You posted the same tale more than once.. as if you could pass the smell test; you don't so far.
LOL everyone??
LOL at you?

Sure!

Hypocrite.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40657
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Joe wrote:
My great grandfather used to record temps back in 1920-1935. He said they drank wine and often made up temps for the log book. He said it was "close enough" for government work. Said everyone did it.
As you've already seen, what you've offered is anecdotal evidence and the science "purists" here will dismiss it out of hand.

That's what they do.

Never mind that the reality of how temperature measurements were made back whenever, and by whomever, and under any ol' circumstance, they have to a "scientific" report before your offering is worth any consideration at all.

But before they actually read the report, they'll first seek to discount it by a verification of the author, the publication and the funding sources.

Having passed those measures, then comes the "peer review" hurdle, which moves depending on a variety of factors, which they'll decide later.

Whew!

And then possibly if you've met their even increasing standards of acceptable evidence, they trot out an contrary study from their ever increasing vault and announce yours is wrong, because they have a "consensus" behind them.

They're quite comfortable with the closed loop they've created.

That's just what they do.

That's what they call "science".

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Level 10

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40658
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
These deniers are out touch with reality.. crazy people are posting in topix..
The deniers visit foreign climes and report the facts. The Maldives are beautiful, the sea life abounds. They import fossil fuel; they don't use solar panels or wind turbines.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40659
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
As you've already seen, what you've offered is anecdotal evidence and the science "purists" here will dismiss it out of hand.
That's what they do.
Never mind that the reality of how temperature measurements were made back whenever, and by whomever, and under any ol' circumstance, they have to a "scientific" report before your offering is worth any consideration at all.
But before they actually read the report, they'll first seek to discount it by a verification of the author, the publication and the funding sources.
Having passed those measures, then comes the "peer review" hurdle, which moves depending on a variety of factors, which they'll decide later.
Whew!
And then possibly if you've met their even increasing standards of acceptable evidence, they trot out an contrary study from their ever increasing vault and announce yours is wrong, because they have a "consensus" behind them.
They're quite comfortable with the closed loop they've created.
That's just what they do.
That's what they call "science".
Excellent analysis of the AGW conspiracy, also referred to as "the rigors of scientific inquiry".

Does not affect the FACTs that global warming is real, we are causing it, and there are things we can do about it.
No Warming

Waverly, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40660
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Anti Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You sick mother F*****!!! You are suggesting that you learned your perversions from "family movies"?
That is why you desire to F*** K_____ in the A***???
Perhaps you might try exercising you right to bear arms and play a game called R______ R_______!
This thread has them thar hilljack fellars, thems sic sum beeches.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40661
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
names include personal, government, and location names..
Still waiting for its long list of names... of "everyone'"s..

BWAHAHAHA

“Let's X Change!!”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40662
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
With Places like Antarctica there are few countries that have aircraft capable of bringing stuff in & out. There is only a small window in the southern summer to do it so lots of researchers hitch a ride with the US. In other words there will be a year of data lost on tea party BS and in the end what do they achieve ? Not a damn thing except drive those positive growth numbers backwards.
http://www.livescience.com/40237-antarctic-re...
if over a decade of not warming doesn't mean anything....how important can one year be in the big scheme of things? Besides...I doubt the data and observations will be lost. I bet warmists would probably wish that with the current direction of climate though.

“Let's X Change!!”

Level 4

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40663
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You think words analyze climate phenomena.. hahahahaha
How come they don't hire you to teach climate science?
haha. And I guess you could do a better job than the other poster, son??
Maybe you could teach a class on the Nobel Prize selection committee?
You would be just as lost and clueless I'm sure!!
Bwaaaaaahhhhaaaa
No Warming

Waverly, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40664
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>if over a decade of not warming doesn't mean anything....how important can one year be in the big scheme of things? Besides...I doubt the data and observations will be lost. I bet warmists would probably wish that with the current direction of climate though.
You must not be reading the wisdom from Less Fact More Tripe, the last decade was only noise. As was the decade before that, and the decade before that, and ...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40665
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>haha. And I guess you could do a better job than the other poster, son??
Maybe you could teach a class on the Nobel Prize selection committee?
You would be just as lost and clueless I'm sure!!
Bwaaaaaahhhhaaaa
LOL. You started a war in one post and lost it promptly.

I'm RIGHT.. you are WRONG..

BWAHAHAHAHA

P.S. Why do you beat a dead horse? That makes you dead WRONG. RIP.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40666
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No Warming wrote:
<quoted text>
You must not be reading the wisdom from Less Fact More Tripe, the last decade was only noise. As was the decade before that, and the decade before that, and ...
.. you are incorrect.

So "no warming" then equals noise. You are NOISE!

LOL.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Orlando Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Orlando People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Orlando News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Orlando
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••