First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Mary - Crestwood

Midlothian, IL

#1 Oct 1, 2012
I cannot believe that Lou Preta wants to run for Mayor after sitting back for over 20 years and doing NOTHiNG but voting for everything Stranczek wanted to do. He admits that he knew that they were mixing well water with clean Chicago water. He also sat back while they certified to the State EPA that the water was all Lake Micigan water purchased from Alsip.

Now, he thinks we are all stupid enough to vote for him like he had nothing to do with it. On top of all of that, he spent the Villages money, our money, on legal fees that he never saw or bothered to review instead of using the money to better our town.

NO TO LOU PRESTA FOR MAYOR!
No Toscas for mayor

Munster, IN

#2 Oct 2, 2012
Mary - Crestwood wrote:
I cannot believe that Lou Preta wants to run for Mayor after sitting back for over 20 years and doing NOTHiNG but voting for everything Stranczek wanted to do. He admits that he knew that they were mixing well water with clean Chicago water. He also sat back while they certified to the State EPA that the water was all Lake Micigan water purchased from Alsip.
Now, he thinks we are all stupid enough to vote for him like he had nothing to do with it. On top of all of that, he spent the Villages money, our money, on legal fees that he never saw or bothered to review instead of using the money to better our town.
NO TO LOU PRESTA FOR MAYOR!
Nice post John Z Toscas
Chet

Alsip, IL

#3 Oct 2, 2012
Vote for Lou he is just like me and my son.
no lou

Midlothian, IL

#4 Oct 3, 2012
I tried talking to Lou Presta not to long ago and I thought I was talking to a child. There's nothing working upstairs for that guy. It made me really nervous for our future.
Chet

Alsip, IL

#5 Oct 3, 2012
no lou wrote:
I tried talking to Lou Presta not to long ago and I thought I was talking to a child. There's nothing working upstairs for that guy. It made me really nervous for our future.
Its ok us Stranczek have been telling the Trustees how to think for over 25 years. Its not going to stop now Bobby will still be running this town.
no lou

Midlothian, IL

#6 Oct 3, 2012
Chet wrote:
<quoted text>Its ok us Stranczek have been telling the Trustees how to think for over 25 years. Its not going to stop now Bobby will still be running this town.
Unfortunately your right.
joker

United States

#7 Oct 3, 2012
Look at John T putting all these post up
Chet

Alsip, IL

#8 Oct 6, 2012
I told Lou about the poison water and he said it was ok with him as long as I did not tell on him so my lips are sealed.
crestwood resident

Midlothian, IL

#9 Oct 6, 2012
heard toscas has gary carr on his ticket. He just lost my vote and respect. carr is a piece of crap.
Willie The Wino

Alsip, IL

#10 Oct 6, 2012
Vote for Lou lets keep things the same I love to drive thur you town drunk as a skunk knowing your cops can,t stop me.
Real Crestwood Resident

Alsip, IL

#11 Oct 6, 2012
crestwood resident wrote:
heard toscas has gary carr on his ticket. He just lost my vote and respect. carr is a piece of crap.
I heard lou has people that poisoned residents on his ticket. Never had my vote or respect.I will not call names.I don,t know who this carr is but I don,t think he poisoned my Wife and Kids did he ?
Name Changer

Chicago, IL

#13 Oct 8, 2012
Real Crestwood Resident wrote:
<quoted text>I heard lou has people that poisoned residents on his ticket. Never had my vote or respect.I will not call names.I don,t know who this carr is but I don,t think he poisoned my Wife and Kids did he ?
Blackheart or what ever name you are going with. You "HEAR" a lot of thing but never present proof. Who is on Lou's ticket that poisoned us. name who you heard or shut up. We are tired of you coming on here spreading lies and rumors. If your not doing that you are complaining. Time to man up and present proof or forever shut up. Once again do not offer any of your lies or lame excuses. Present facts that is if you have any which is probably closer to the truth.
Name Changer

Chicago, IL

#14 Oct 8, 2012
Willie The Wino wrote:
Vote for Lou lets keep things the same I love to drive thur you town drunk as a skunk knowing your cops can,t stop me.
Really Blackheart. Really. You donít think we see through your BS and know it is you posting multiple times under multiple names. Use the name Sybil that would at least make sense and coincide with your multiple personalities.
um

Midlothian, IL

#15 Oct 8, 2012
Name Changer wrote:
<quoted text>Blackheart or what ever name you are going with. You "HEAR" a lot of thing but never present proof. Who is on Lou's ticket that poisoned us. name who you heard or shut up. We are tired of you coming on here spreading lies and rumors. If your not doing that you are complaining. Time to man up and present proof or forever shut up. Once again do not offer any of your lies or lame excuses. Present facts that is if you have any which is probably closer to the truth.
I'm not the person your talking directly too. But you asked the question to Blackheart. "Who on Lou's ticket poisoned us?" Well the answer is LOU! Vinyl chloride is a poison, right? It was allowed to flow thru our drinking water, right? Lou was in on record saying that they knew about it. So LOU the head of that ticket is the one the poisoned us. I don't know if anyone died directly from this chemical. That neither here nor there! It was don't by them and it should never have happened! End of story!!! You want to vote for Lou go a head you clearly have bigger troubles then. But me and all the rest that care about our community and care that we have been given this poison are voting for TOSCAS in 2013!!! Have a nice day. And backwater or One is correct you are wrong and don't speck for other people. That person makes great cents!
Romney I

Midlothian, IL

#16 Oct 8, 2012
um wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the person your talking directly too. But you asked the question to Blackheart. "Who on Lou's ticket poisoned us?" Well the answer is LOU! Vinyl chloride is a poison, right? It was allowed to flow thru our drinking water, right? Lou was in on record saying that they knew about it. So LOU the head of that ticket is the one the poisoned us. I don't know if anyone died directly from this chemical. That neither here nor there! It was don't by them and it should never have happened! End of story!!! You want to vote for Lou go a head you clearly have bigger troubles then. But me and all the rest that care about our community and care that we have been given this poison are voting for TOSCAS in 2013!!! Have a nice day. And backwater or One is correct you are wrong and don't speck for other people. That person makes great cents!
I feel sorry for You and the rest of the residents
Name Changer

Chicago, IL

#17 Oct 8, 2012
um wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the person your talking directly too. But you asked the question to Blackheart. "Who on Lou's ticket poisoned us?" Well the answer is LOU! Vinyl chloride is a poison, right? It was allowed to flow thru our drinking water, right? Lou was in on record saying that they knew about it. So LOU the head of that ticket is the one the poisoned us. I don't know if anyone died directly from this chemical. That neither here nor there! It was don't by them and it should never have happened! End of story!!! You want to vote for Lou go a head you clearly have bigger troubles then. But me and all the rest that care about our community and care that we have been given this poison are voting for TOSCAS in 2013!!! Have a nice day. And backwater or One is correct you are wrong and don't speck for other people. That person makes great cents!
Well apparently the water did something to you. First off it affected your ability to understand a question correctly. You apparently have no reading comprehension skills what so ever.
Your sentence structure and spelling is absolutely atrocious.
I never stated I speak for anyone but me. I was simply calling out the poster who comes on here and posts all kinds of BS under multiple monikers all the time. He posts comments as fact without any proof. And when he is called out to present proof he does not. So if you are ok with not checking out or demanding proof from people posting on internet sites that is fine by me. But I myself want proof.
If you think a person who posts under different names and when questioned about his posts presents absolutely no proof good for you. I bet Toscas does not even want a person of your character actively and publicly supporting him. You would do more harm to his campaign the help it.
By the way I have never declared who I am going to support. There will be other candidates to come out. So unlike you I will wait until all the candidates declare themselves then I will listen to all of them and make an educated decision based on what I hear. And for the record I will absolutely verify every comment each and every candidate makes. If I am unable to find proof I will demand the candidate to present proof so I can verify the comment.
um

United States

#18 Oct 8, 2012
Name Changer wrote:
<quoted text>Well apparently the water did something to you. First off it affected your ability to understand a question correctly. You apparently have no reading comprehension skills what so ever.
Your sentence structure and spelling is absolutely atrocious.
I never stated I speak for anyone but me. I was simply calling out the poster who comes on here and posts all kinds of BS under multiple monikers all the time. He posts comments as fact without any proof. And when he is called out to present proof he does not. So if you are ok with not checking out or demanding proof from people posting on internet sites that is fine by me. But I myself want proof.
If you think a person who posts under different names and when questioned about his posts presents absolutely no proof good for you. I bet Toscas does not even want a person of your character actively and publicly supporting him. You would do more harm to his campaign the help it.
By the way I have never declared who I am going to support. There will be other candidates to come out. So unlike you I will wait until all the candidates declare themselves then I will listen to all of them and make an educated decision based on what I hear. And for the record I will absolutely verify every comment each and every candidate makes. If I am unable to find proof I will demand the candidate to present proof so I can verify the comment.
Ok professor! You said "who on Lou's ticket poisoned us", right or wrong? Explain what about my sentence structure you did not like or what I spelled wrong and what is atrocious as you say. You lost this battle so your deflecting from what i said. You also said "We are tired of you coming on here and spreading rumors and lies". So who is WE and would that not mean your speaking for more than yourself, which in that case you should use I. Moron!!!
um

United States

#19 Oct 8, 2012
Name Changer wrote:
<quoted text>Well apparently the water did something to you. First off it affected your ability to understand a question correctly. You apparently have no reading comprehension skills what so ever.
Your sentence structure and spelling is absolutely atrocious.
I never stated I speak for anyone but me. I was simply calling out the poster who comes on here and posts all kinds of BS under multiple monikers all the time. He posts comments as fact without any proof. And when he is called out to present proof he does not. So if you are ok with not checking out or demanding proof from people posting on internet sites that is fine by me. But I myself want proof.
If you think a person who posts under different names and when questioned about his posts presents absolutely no proof good for you. I bet Toscas does not even want a person of your character actively and publicly supporting him. You would do more harm to his campaign the help it.
By the way I have never declared who I am going to support. There will be other candidates to come out. So unlike you I will wait until all the candidates declare themselves then I will listen to all of them and make an educated decision based on what I hear. And for the record I will absolutely verify every comment each and every candidate makes. If I am unable to find proof I will demand the candidate to present proof so I can verify the comment.
I'm reading your posts again and it's pretty funny that you question anyone else's Spelling, sentence structure and reading comprehension. Did you even pass grammar school?
Gammer

Midlothian, IL

#20 Oct 8, 2012
um wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok professor! You said "who on Lou's ticket poisoned us", right or wrong? Explain what about my sentence structure you did not like or what I spelled wrong and what is atrocious as you say. You lost this battle so your deflecting from what i said. You also said "We are tired of you coming on here and spreading rumors and lies". So who is WE and would that not mean your speaking for more than yourself, which in that case you should use I. Moron!!!
If I may interject here. The other poster was referring to the following comment "heard lou has people that poisoned residents on his ticket."authored by another poster. As you can see the other poster was referring to other people not Lou himself. Other people clearly refers to" other" which means different or other people or other things so I am sorry that you happen to be in the wrong here.
I am not taking sides here but you asked right or wrong and unfortunately in this instance you are wrong and from a third person looking in it would appear you are the one deflecting here. We refers to people in general or refers to at least one other person say their significant other in addition we can be used by a writer or speaker to include the listener or speaker in what is being said, or can be used sarcastically or condescendingly by a speaker which is what I believe the authors intention was.
I could go back in your original post and point out a lot of grammatical and spelling errors but there is really no need to unless of course would like me too.
You asked on a public blog and I answered it and will not stoop to name calling.
um

Alsip, IL

#21 Oct 8, 2012
Gammer wrote:
<quoted text>If I may interject here. The other poster was referring to the following comment "heard lou has people that poisoned residents on his ticket."authored by another poster. As you can see the other poster was referring to other people not Lou himself. Other people clearly refers to" other" which means different or other people or other things so I am sorry that you happen to be in the wrong here.
I am not taking sides here but you asked right or wrong and unfortunately in this instance you are wrong and from a third person looking in it would appear you are the one deflecting here. We refers to people in general or refers to at least one other person say their significant other in addition we can be used by a writer or speaker to include the listener or speaker in what is being said, or can be used sarcastically or condescendingly by a speaker which is what I believe the authors intention was.
I could go back in your original post and point out a lot of grammatical and spelling errors but there is really no need to unless of course would like me too.
You asked on a public blog and I answered it and will not stoop to name calling.
Please do go back and point out the spelling errors for me. Ill wait!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Orland Park Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Reality Of Racism 1 hr big ballz 4
vfw 2 hr trumbull 2
Mokena Park Commissioner McJimpsy 4 hr Parks for all 14
Looking for District 228 parents 4 hr George 4
Sharky Confession continued 4 hr Patriot 5
Carly Fiorina 2016 5 hr Patriot 6
Lincoln Way North Closing??? 8 hr Concerned resident 5
More from around the web

Orland Park People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]