Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Habbits]

The behavior described in these files is terribly sad and evil.

There is no excuse, no explaining away what happened to these children.

The priests involved had the duty to be their spiritual fathers and they failed.

And the nuns just keep on coming.

[Dusty Mangina]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
How hard is it for people like you to understand the concept of two consenting adults?

They get it, but it seriously narrows the argument down for them (so they throw in all of the distractions).

I've watched my Kimare do it for years.

[BlowFish]

Big easy

[Marram]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I do. Its current misusage is meant to demonize the anti-gay crowd, and to subjugate it. The current usage of that word is a blatant lie, it is why I take exception to it. I make no pretensions to intellectual ability, I am merely standing up as strongly, for my side, as you are, for yours. Are you expecting any less ? Yes, I have plenty of logical arguments, usually dismissed by your side, as if those arguments mean nothing. We are plagued with propaganda extolling the fact that the majority of Americans support SSM, when, in fact, we do not. I have never met anyone that actually supports it, and I travel the country in a semi, and I ask on the CB radio, I ask people that I deal with, just to see if I am missing anything. I am not. I have even seen a large number of bumper stickers that are being displayed that condemn the notion of SSM. Homosexuality is a behavioral phenomenon, defined as same-gender sexual conduct, and the idea that the institution of marriage is being appropriated by a few libertines, for the financial benefits to be had from the government, cheapens the whole definition and purpose of marriage. It makes a mockery of everything that it has represented, until now. Heterosexual couples and homosexual couples are not equal, but the SSM crowd wishes us to ignore this fact.Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is immutable. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental truth about what it means to be human.
All human beings with the exception of hermaphrodites (people with genital deformities) are born with a reproductive system that is heterosexual by nature. We are either male or female. We have sexual feelings only because of chemical and other processes that are rooted in our procreative heterosexual design. Thus, a male sexual orientation toward a female (or vise versa) is self-evidently normal and natural. By contrast, a male-to-male or female-to-female orientation is self-evidently abnormal and unnatural. For homosexuality to be equivalent to heterosexuality, it would need to be rooted in its own homosexual physiology.
In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent
to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.
So, yes I have arguments, but they are likely to be dismissed by your crowd...As if a wave of a hand can disqualify the truth.

All strawman no substance.

[The Chicago Project]

The Rogers Project wrote:

Yes, who was Jesse William Dirkhising? And what in the world does he have in common with Justin Daniel James or with Cristy Zugey Álvarez?

And Mary Stachowicz.

[Marram]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Bigfoot, usage gives words their meaning.
Their origins are interesting trivia at the most.
After all, men can become hysterical.

Excellent observation.

[LowDown on Athens]

http://www.virginia.edu/igpr/APAG/apagoilhist...

[Frankie Rizzo]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do lions lick their balls?
Because they can.
Why do lions like their backsides?
To get the taste of Christians out of their mouths.

That's dumb because the Christians would be coming out their asses too. So they'd taste them all over again. Duh.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Marram wrote:

<quoted text>
All strawman no substance.

Has Rose_NoHo impressed you again tonight with a particularly "intelligent and insightful" post? How about the one about lions licking their asses?

Too Funny!

[Frankie Rizzo]

Bore On wrote:

Was the last poster a:
1.) Out of towner?
2.) A bore on?
3.) Just a out of work idiot?
4.) Out of country poster?
5.) a non US citizen that supports the Repubicans?
6.) Married to a Republican but not a citizen?
7.) out to the cleaners.
8.) Folding tin hats to protect their heads.
9.) Four idiots who are asking who's on top?

Your town sucks.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Off of Broadway, almost in my old backyard...
:D

Got a crazy cousin lives out there. Not far from the VFW. Nice bar there, open to the public, just sign in at the door.

[Frankie Rizzo]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
How hard is it for people like you to understand the concept of two consenting adults?

Or three consenting adults?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
How cute! Now the little boy mikey is spreading his insecurities of approval and attention onto us! He knows I'm the big bad round here, but he doesn't like it!

Too funny! Arnold liked it too!

http://www.honekut.com/HonEkutCom_Audio/Sound...

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Has Rose_NoHo impressed you again tonight with a particularly "intelligent and insightful" post? How about the one about lions licking their asses?
Too Funny!

Morron doesn't realize that that is all off-topic, and I see that Big D won't mention it to them...

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Or three consenting adults?

What's good for two can only be better for three...

[sheesh void of hate]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Or three consenting adults?

Why yes, of course.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
That's dumb because the Christians would be coming out their asses too. So they'd taste them all over again. Duh.

Excellent observation. And if a lion wants to lick his Chongo, let him.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
Why yes, of course.

Good man.
:-D

Got the Ford incident all sorted out ?

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

Later, kids, off to work..

[sheesh void of hate]

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Good man.
:-D
Got the Ford incident all sorted out ?

Not entirely. Got the check from the insurance company deposited. I gotta hand it to 'em for being more than fair. I'll be sorting out a new truck as soon as the weather is in my favor and I feel limber enough to put one through some maneuvers. Gotta strecth of road that my old one performed poorly on (no, not the scene of the crash) that I want to run down. Stretch of 65 mph concrete divided four lane that had the thing rocking from front to rear rather violently. I think it was a function of wheel base (crew cab long bed) and the distance between expansion joints in the slab. Very annoying experience that could best be described as Yshyahyahyahyahyahyahyahyahyah yahyahyahyahyahyah... Perhaps a little bit slower than that, but annoying all the same. I'm on that stretch a fair fraction of my driving time around here and would like to not experience it anymore.