Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana in 2010?

[MrsCuldesac]

lol,lol.... well you tell em! lol

[big daddy]

Vitter !!!

[Stacey]

David Vitter

[Bilbo Baggins]

Seriously? Diaper Dave is your man? Lets hope there is a landslide of tea party folks elected in 2012 to the House, Senate and Whitehouse, I'd love to see the reaction of taxpayers when they put you on a voucher system for your medicare, Privatize SS benefits which will be controlled by the bankers and wall street, continue the tax breaks for the top 1% and continue the unfunded one trillion dollar military industrial complex bubble.

[fruitcake]

Helloooooooo! Why is this board still here? Diaper Dave's current term doesn't expire until 2016. He's NOT RUNNING this year!

[Canal Street Madam]

fruitcake wrote:

Helloooooooo! Why is this board still here? Diaper Dave's current term doesn't expire until 2016. He's NOT RUNNING this year!

Dave fought for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, because he believes in the sanctity of marriage. He has run as a tough family values God fearing Republican, and there’s nothing wrong with having a diaper fetish. While he may not be running for office this year, you can’t bad mouth him and get away with it. He is one of my best costumers, and I will defend him for the great guy he is. And for the record he HAS had the RUNNS this year.

[Roshanda Lolita Benita]

Canal Street Madam wrote:

<quoted text>
Dave fought for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, because he believes in the sanctity of marriage. He has run as a tough family values God fearing Republican, and there’s nothing wrong with having a diaper fetish. While he may not be running for office this year, you can’t bad mouth him and get away with it. He is one of my best costumers, and I will defend him for the great guy he is. And for the record he HAS had the RUNNS this year.

That is too Funny!!!!

Keep-On-keeping on Girl!!!!

[too bad]

Canal Street Madam wrote:

<quoted text>
Dave fought for the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, because he believes in the sanctity of marriage. He has run as a tough family values God fearing Republican, and there’s nothing wrong with having a diaper fetish. While he may not be running for office this year, you can’t bad mouth him and get away with it. He is one of my best costumers, and I will defend him for the great guy he is. And for the record he HAS had the RUNNS this year.

Too bad Vitter was caught in the prostitution sex ring of the Lolita whores and thus he has no family values nor the sanctity of marriage, except to break them, and he should have resigned from the U.S. Senate. If he believes in the marriage act, by having sex with some of the Lolita's prostitutes, he must favor Mormonism. LOL

David Vitter does not run again due to his 2010 recently won 6 year term. So this “Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana in 2010 will not be up for reelection until 2016. As far as Gentleman David Vitter, due to no election in the David Vitter Senatorial District until 2016, this discussion thread is dead and needs no more posts, thank you.

[Jane]

Islandude wrote:

Vitter don't cry

Well, actually, he does - like a baby

in a diaper

full of poop.

What a proud leader for your state! LOL!

[vitter]

David Vitter

[That Sherman boy]

my town will support who ever is going to help us accomplish what we are trying to acomplish in our town of Simmesport La. If u want our votes, contact us on our forums, :mooch for mayor; ETC SHERMAN. Thank you if u take the time to read, please escuse the drama, and the way i respond to my young generation, thats how they comprhend political talk,. Fell free to post. SHERMAN

[Dlove021]

Cody wrote:

out with the old, in with the new....the ones in congress now have had plenty of time to do good and squandered it to get rich, and never a thought to the working class. We have had enough of typical carreer polititians, either party. period.

Two thumbs up We need to rearrange the whole legislative branch. Everyone need to go 99.9

[Dlove021]

dahling wrote:

Once again, we are faced with no real choices that can win. Vote for the Democrats and they will continue to run 2 of the 3 branches of government and who knows where they will go. Vote for the Republican and the Senate will be a stalemate, which does no one any good. I find it hard to vote for a man like Vitter because of his lack of morals. If he will not honor his marriage vows and lies to his wife, he will lie to me also. By default, it looks like I will vote against Vitter and not vote for Melancon. The others have no chance. God help us.

Supreme court is no republic and congress is made of 2 hoses so u can't say 2/3 dumb azz remember legislative branch house of representatives and senate. So that just 1 branch

[Bob Dobbs]

Dlove021 wrote:

<quoted text>
Supreme court is no republic and congress is made of 2 hoses so u can't say 2/3 dumb azz remember legislative branch house of representatives and senate. So that just 1 branch

Jesus. Effing. Christ.

[Tubes]

The local Cub Scouts could do a better job than the present batch of thieves.

Or, Kindergarten Class of 2011 could do quite a lot better.

[Katashi]

redirect wrote:

he is not OBAMA

Vitter is the best canidate money can buy!

Washington, D.C.– The battle to be named CREW’s first Scoundrel of the Month came down to a race between two johns. In the end, Louisiana’s morally and ethically challenged Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) triumphed over Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) in the race to Washington’s bottom. Former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) also earned a dishonorable mention from the online electorate.

“Senator Vitter graduated from soliciting prostitutes in the shadows, to bribery in broad daylight. It’s no wonder he was crowned Scoundrel of the Month,” said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan.“This is not to discount the despicable behavior of the other worthy nominees. This bipartisan bunch could all stake a claim for their own place in CREW’s hall of shame. But, to paraphrase Chicago Cubs fans around the world, there’s always next month.”

http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/entry/...

[chris]

no one, it is amazing to me that people waste their time voting in these elections which only represent special clicks which include all but the productive working classes, the only true thing which would start effective change in this land is all good men refrain from voting, cancel their registration, it would be cominsurate to the governments conducting a war but nobody came. it is time for an awakining of the populace. if they have the election and the only votes cast are those of the government body, who can they claim to represent. They don t represent us and never have. Good peoplel need to let them know we have had it with their s@@t. Good people should not have to cower in their homes in this state of anarchy, fear travel down the road expecting government police to further rob them of their hard labor, and then hand another half over at the end of the year to their taxing bodies so the theives will be well fed, medicated and housed at the expense of the working class.

[chris]

Katashi wrote:

<quoted text>
Vitter is the best canidate money can buy!
Washington, D.C.– The battle to be named CREW’s first Scoundrel of the Month came down to a race between two johns. In the end, Louisiana’s morally and ethically challenged Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) triumphed over Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) in the race to Washington’s bottom. Former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) also earned a dishonorable mention from the online electorate.
“Senator Vitter graduated from soliciting prostitutes in the shadows, to bribery in broad daylight. It’s no wonder he was crowned Scoundrel of the Month,” said CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan.“This is not to discount the despicable behavior of the other worthy nominees. This bipartisan bunch could all stake a claim for their own place in CREW’s hall of shame. But, to paraphrase Chicago Cubs fans around the world, there’s always next month.”
http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/entry/...

they are all scum, as the old saying, cream and scum always float to the top. the problem is people are tolerating being controlle from the top, and of course the top is deplorably corrupted. If people go to cash payments the corrupt government would colaspe in short time. Then we can rebuild an honest system the has the interst of the good and proper

[hub city hammer]

I totally agree

chris wrote:

<quoted text>
they are all scum, as the old saying, cream and scum always float to the top. the problem is people are tolerating being controlle from the top, and of course the top is deplorably corrupted. If people go to cash payments the corrupt government would colaspe in short time. Then we can rebuild an honest system the has the interst of the good and proper

[John Morris]

I totally agree