Further claiming that law enforcement has no authority to prevent him from expressing his speech to others in public. That the government has no business altering is freedom to remain assemble on the public side walk. That in any event the law enforcement officers place him under arrest. It will be a false arrest, because they are a government entity agency that is prohibited from forceable moving any citizen who shall assemble in public.
The police officers had responded do to an individual contacting law enforcement about him harrassing them.
Note: Individual majority to almost every citizen and law enforcement does not know the actual legislative intention "harassing" means. Just like "Disorderly Conduct" several persons are falsely arrested. When he and she had never committed no criminal offense. Law enforcement officers do not realize that the defitition "harassment" and "disorderly conduct" can not be taken by the actual statutory wording.
Note: In order for "harassment and disorderly conduct" to actual have some meaning one must turn to case law. In order to determine what the high court decisions have rule in different type of matters. That's why "harassment and disorderly conduct" case that a state attorney has filed and prosecuted are dismissed.
Note: If you read the defitition of "disorderly conduct" you would notice the legislatures intention. The actual words can be determined to me "no person does not have no type of freedom of speech, assemble, petition, expression, and religious freedom."
Note: Because there are individuals and group of people that would say any thing too try and have a citizen arrested. When they want they realize that threatening or causing harm to a person or group of people will not force them to not enjoy his or her freedom of speech,assemble, petition, expression, and religious freedom."
Note: Then these type of citizens contact the police department and lie in order to get law enforcement officers to respond to the location where a individual or group are assembled and expessing their own freedom of speech. To get individual and group of citizens arrested in order to remove them from the public side walks, public forums, public parks, and government forum property,as well even when he or she is on their own private property.
Note: Then when the police, states attorney, and government do not do not in any way infringe, deprive, and deny individuals and group of people, because it's his and her constitutional protection rights of freedom of speech, assemble, petition, expression, and religious freedom." Then these people further continue to call police departments and complain that a individual or group is harrassing them. When by nature of law it's not harrassment by no means. These individuals and groups that complain that a person and or people are harrassing them have not.
Note: Once again the legislature intention wording results in persons having no constitutional protection rights of freedom of speech, assemble, petition, expression, and religious freedom." That's why court cases are referred to in order to understand the court's rulings. Any person that does not want a person to express his or her speech and assemble in public on a public side walk will the majority of the time call the police department and try and make a false arrest against another person to have police officers to abuse his or her duties by forceable removing citizens from public side walks and all public forums. That he or she has been enjoying them selves. While threatening other citizens to get off of public side walks or out of public parks. When they and no one has no business treating anyone indifferent:
Signed: Brian James O'Neill II -- Mr. Constitution