Scientist Tests Husband's DNA, Fidelity

A state forensics scientist who said she tested DNA in her husband's underwear to find out whether he was cheating could be disciplined if investigators determine she violated the use of state equipment. Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Alison

Capitol Heights, MD

#25 Jul 4, 2007
One person does not cause the other to cheat. And it has nothing to do w/ being energetic in the bedroom. The cheater is usually afraid to face up to commitment or some emotional connection w/ his partner and seeks out a cheap thrill that involves a lack of emotional connection. So don't blame the victim. Blame the deceitful, lying two-timer who is too weak to face some emotional issues in his relationship, and instead chooses to hurt his partner, and he's probably making all kinds of pathetic promises to the woman he's cheating w/ and she'll eventually feel rejected when that relationship doesn't work out. But put blame where it's due, not on the woman who was cheated on.
Ranger Tim

United States

#26 Jul 4, 2007
Why in the world would this poor woman be investigated and "disciplined" just because she has the means and knowledge to prove her husband's infidelity? What's the investigation for? Both partners acknowledge this guy's infidelity. How much of the tax payers money will be spent on this fools errand? Obviously, the Michigan State Police have too much time on their hands and no motivation to conduct investigations into real criminal activity.
Bel Gazou

United States

#27 Jul 4, 2007
I hope that some enterprising company will offer the service or come up with a home test that you can buy. It's a lot cheaper than hiring a P.I. and more conclusive.
Old Dog

Albuquerque, NM

#28 Jul 4, 2007
Although she is "on Duty", and she is a "good one" scientist...SHE IS A PUBLIC SERVANT with the all 9 yards of regulation and ethic rules attached with her contract when she signed in...Immagines...The Frustrated FBI agent, the DOD "Victim", the CIA agent who don't get his promotion, the "Soldier"...And so on..Then what???... ALL OF THEM WILL BREAK THE RULES as they may need it???...Lives and results depend of these highly qualified people's Ethic. Her husband did not commit a public crime deseving a CSI. Period.
Please don't serve with male or female situation or feeling: it is the rules.
If her husband want to sue her...It is indeed his right...At that point the Court will decide!...If he is wrong he will pay the price too!.
Besrat wrote:
It is upto the Police Department to sue her but I beleive she is still on duty on the cheating husbands case.He has no right to procecute her.She is on duty as precious sceintiest spending more of her time for public service while the other body is cheating.I think she need a pardon.
Bel Gazou

United States

#29 Jul 4, 2007
So the state should charge her for use of the chemicals and the equipment and be done with it.
Bald Eagle

United States

#30 Jul 5, 2007
Bel Gazou wrote:
So the state should charge her for use of the chemicals and the equipment and be done with it.
THE article clearly stated that she was OFF duty & That the chemicals she used were to be thrown away. Where's the crime?

“Nice Gloomy, Spooky Day”

Since: Apr 07

Uniondale , NY (Nassau Cty)

#31 Jul 6, 2007
Just An Observer wrote:
Maybe in the future they'll have an over-the-counter DNA test. LOL! She's in the wrong marriage if she doesn't trust her spouse.
That is cool!!! Over the counter "Swingin Willy Buster".
Bel Gazou

United States

#32 Jul 6, 2007
Bald Eagle wrote:
<quoted text> THE article clearly stated that she was OFF duty & That the chemicals she used were to be thrown away. Where's the crime?
The article clearly stated that it was SHE who claimed that she was off duty and using chemicals that were slated to be discarded. She probably cannot prove either. Also, the state code prohibits personal use of either the equipment or the supplies whether it be on/off duty. Instead of making a big braciola about it, I think that they should just charge her for the equipment and supplies used and for the time she spent using it should she not be able to prove that she was off duty.
Mig

Lansing, MI

#33 Aug 12, 2007
well thats it I guess no more playing cards on the police cars laptop or playing with the GPS or maybe having a crush on someone and looking them up etc.... Tell me this.
If you could zoom in on a house or car or building and really see whats going on inside behind the doors and walls, Would you?
Well its already been done and is going on, so how far do you take this.
Watch how it turns out, Its now being closed down.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Okemos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Spicus USA Thu yutubrutus 1
Police: Man Threatened Paramedics With Sword Jan 28 reality is a crutch 1
any GOOD single women? Jan 26 eyeball 1
Review: East Michigan Family Care - Shannon Wig... (Jan '11) Jan 24 klm1959 43
Poll: Support for gay marriage drops in Mich. (May '14) Jan 20 scs2011 68
Jesus Steals Christmas Back From Satan Jan 18 Sandmans worst en... 220
Review: Greener Planet Gardening (Feb '14) Jan 12 green thumbs 2
Okemos Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Okemos People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 am PST

NFL 8:43AM
Jimmy Haslam: Browns have to get a QB in 2015
Bleacher Report 9:17 AM
Jimmy Haslam Speaks on Browns' 2015 QB Situation
Bleacher Report12:23 PM
Manziel's Teammates Discuss QB's Rookie Season
Yahoo! Sports12:24 PM
Report: Cleveland Browns 'wrecked' by Johnny Manziel's rookie season
NBC Sports12:46 PM
Teammate: Manziel was a "100 percent joke" as a rookie