I believe if you will do the research, Mr. Smarty Pants, you will see I call them "homosexuals". I have not used derogatory terminology in describing them.<quoted text>So you do draw a line somewhere at what names you will call them? And you expect all to hold to your personal standard? I see.
Just as you expect all to hold to your standard of what constitutes marriage.
It is all about you, isn't it?
And your statement looks to contradict your opposition to government benefits for gay couples.
Did you vote for civil unions on the past election?
I AM definitely opposed to higher government spending. If you had ever taken an advanced English course you could discern the subtleties of our language. I said I could "accept civil unions". I would not be happy with it, but in the interest at finding compromise (something you extremists know nothing about) I could accept them.
It is like talking with a seventh grader on hormones when I debate with you.