Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#11219 Feb 27, 2013
History has shown-when governments take citizens firearms-bad things happen to the citizens at the hands of the confiscating/controlling govt.

Stay out of my second ammendment rights and business.

tighten laws on criminals and mental cases

Analogy'
When drunk drivers kill people with their cars [they should be punished]
why on earth would anybody in their right mind -propose to take/limit the cars of sober people with good driving WHY BECAUSE!!

It is not about fixing a problem that will be hard, if not impossible to totally stop-there will always be criminals and wierd ass crazies doing horrbly bad stuff. IT IS ABOUT THE PLUTOCRACY OF GOVT TAKING MORE CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE AS THEY EAT AWAY AT OUR FREEDOMS IN THE USA FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PLUTOCRATIC RULING STATE-just a thought??
Toney

Montgomery, WV

#11220 Feb 27, 2013
cherokee mountain lady wrote:
History has shown-when governments take citizens firearms-bad things happen to the citizens at the hands of the confiscating/controlling govt.

Stay out of my second ammendment rights and business.

tighten laws on criminals and mental cases

Analogy'
When drunk drivers kill people with their cars [they should be punished]
why on earth would anybody in their right mind -propose to take/limit the cars of sober people with good driving WHY BECAUSE!!

It is not about fixing a problem that will be hard, if not impossible to totally stop-there will always be criminals and wierd ass crazies doing horrbly bad stuff. IT IS ABOUT THE PLUTOCRACY OF GOVT TAKING MORE CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE AS THEY EAT AWAY AT OUR FREEDOMS IN THE USA FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PLUTOCRATIC RULING STATE-just a thought??
That is not going to happen. They ate not going to prosecute the thugs killing each other in the streets. That is the democrats voting base. How many of those black on black shooters would vote republican. Republicans will not prosecute them when in office because they don't want to spend the money to house them. Shoot these idiots on site and everybody wins. We can't let the thugs win. Also we can't let the politicians win.
Retired RR

Bluefield, WV

#11221 Feb 27, 2013
Toney wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not going to happen. They ate not going to prosecute the thugs killing each other in the streets. That is the democrats voting base. How many of those black on black shooters would vote republican. Republicans will not prosecute them when in office because they don't want to spend the money to house them. Shoot these idiots on site and everybody wins. We can't let the thugs win. Also we can't let the politicians win.
I say take em all

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#11222 Feb 27, 2013
There will be no bans of any kind in the near future. I dont think they have enough votes to even pass the expanded background checks anymore. That part would have passed if they had not been so eager to ban peoples weapons and mags. Now, and righteously so, they fear that expanded checks is just a way to create a registry for future confiscation. No worries, the people have spoken and there will be no federal bans.

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#11223 Feb 27, 2013
cherokee mountain lady wrote:
History has shown-when governments take citizens firearms-bad things happen to the citizens at the hands of the confiscating/controlling govt.
Stay out of my second ammendment rights and business.
tighten laws on criminals and mental cases
Analogy'
When drunk drivers kill people with their cars [they should be punished]
why on earth would anybody in their right mind -propose to take/limit the cars of sober people with good driving WHY BECAUSE!!
It is not about fixing a problem that will be hard, if not impossible to totally stop-there will always be criminals and wierd ass crazies doing horrbly bad stuff. IT IS ABOUT THE PLUTOCRACY OF GOVT TAKING MORE CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE AS THEY EAT AWAY AT OUR FREEDOMS IN THE USA FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PLUTOCRATIC RULING STATE-just a thought??
The problem that the media and the government has is defining what truly is a mental case in a person.
You may disagree with me on this but the problem is not in Hollywood movies and TV shows nor is it in video games because what they do they are not in it for the welfare of anybody,they are in it for profit.
Just like the gun makers,they are not in it for the welfare of others either but are in this for profit.
It is up to the parents to teach their kids right from wrong,know their kids and have enough sensibility and morality to care about their kids and what goes on in their daily lives.
Criminals and people with mental disabilities should never be allowed access to a gun of any kind.
We are good at defining what a criminal is by their rap sheet but we have to be careful about defining what a person's mentality is because anybody can be depressed or angry and still be of good sound mind enough to know right from wrong.
What I'm actually saying here is we must understand and know the difference between mental illness and somebody who just has a bad attitude and,yes,sometimes if not more so that can be very difficult to determine.
him

Rupert, WV

#11224 Feb 28, 2013
he's good
petro

Charleston, WV

#11225 Feb 28, 2013
Oh yes he is very - very GOOD!
?

Alexandria, VA

#11226 Feb 28, 2013
?
Neighborhood Dog

Charlotte, NC

#11227 Feb 28, 2013
Well put.. Can anyone really argue that if the person is on ssi for having mental issues they probably own assault weapons? It's simple in my view, West Virginia can choose to enforce federal laws or do without federal funding. Case Closed!
Neighborhood Dog

Charlotte, NC

#11228 Feb 28, 2013
Ooops I over deleted...I hate textin... I meant to say if "probably shouldn't"
hope

Huntington, WV

#11229 Feb 28, 2013
cherokee mountain lady wrote:
History has shown-when governments take citizens firearms-bad things happen to the citizens at the hands of the confiscating/controlling govt.
Stay out of my second ammendment rights and business.
tighten laws on criminals and mental cases
Analogy'
When drunk drivers kill people with their cars [they should be punished]
why on earth would anybody in their right mind -propose to take/limit the cars of sober people with good driving WHY BECAUSE!!
It is not about fixing a problem that will be hard, if not impossible to totally stop-there will always be criminals and wierd ass crazies doing horrbly bad stuff. IT IS ABOUT THE PLUTOCRACY OF GOVT TAKING MORE CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE AS THEY EAT AWAY AT OUR FREEDOMS IN THE USA FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PLUTOCRATIC RULING STATE-just a thought??
Attention!! Listen to this lady, she's right! Hitler took the German's guns! Consider the parallels between 1930's Nazi Germany and our current culture. This is it people. Wake up, please.
hope

Huntington, WV

#11230 Feb 28, 2013
Gary Coaldigger wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem that the media and the government has is defining what truly is a mental case in a person.
You may disagree with me on this but the problem is not in Hollywood movies and TV shows nor is it in video games because what they do they are not in it for the welfare of anybody,they are in it for profit.
Just like the gun makers,they are not in it for the welfare of others either but are in this for profit.
It is up to the parents to teach their kids right from wrong,know their kids and have enough sensibility and morality to care about their kids and what goes on in their daily lives.
Criminals and people with mental disabilities should never be allowed access to a gun of any kind.
We are good at defining what a criminal is by their rap sheet but we have to be careful about defining what a person's mentality is because anybody can be depressed or angry and still be of good sound mind enough to know right from wrong.
What I'm actually saying here is we must understand and know the difference between mental illness and somebody who just has a bad attitude and,yes,sometimes if not more so that can be very difficult to determine.
look up the definition of "plutocracy",it emphasizes the heaviness of our situation. this is our reality

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#11231 Feb 28, 2013
Neighborhood Dog wrote:
Well put.. Can anyone really argue that if the person is on ssi for having mental issues they probably own assault weapons? It's simple in my view, West Virginia can choose to enforce federal laws or do without federal funding. Case Closed!
What are you talking about? What federal laws are WV not enforcing?

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#11232 Feb 28, 2013
hope wrote:
<quoted text>
look up the definition of "plutocracy",it emphasizes the heaviness of our situation. this is our reality
Although I do believe that plays a big part in what's wrong in this country however I don't believe that is the only problem that is going on that is tearing down this country.
AAA

Shasta Lake, CA

#11233 Mar 1, 2013
OK
Tiny

Shymkent, Kazakhstan

#11234 Mar 1, 2013
AAA wrote:
OK
ok what?
Nissan

Chicago, IL

#11235 Mar 1, 2013
What!
Toney

Montgomery, WV

#11236 Mar 2, 2013
You

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#11237 Mar 2, 2013
A tangent re; our current plutocracy. The federal govt in 2008 had +-138 luxury limosines to haul the putocrats around on OUR DIME. Now in 2013 the number of fat cat limosines owned by the feds has increased to +_373-on OUR DIME- to haul our plutocracy to their many special interests conferences where they dine on the very best gourmet delights and beverages.

There is so much grandiose waste in the govt -if it werent so sad, it would be endless Saturday Night Live material-literally BBBillions $$$ of dollars totally unnaccounted for-LOST INTO THIN AIR- in the pentagon/military operations with contractors--again, on OUR DIME.

On another note"USING CHILDREN AS PROPS HAS A LONG HISTORY WITH OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISTS, HITLER, STALIN, MAO SE TUNG [SP?][re; the national gun debate brainwashing of a weak and uninformed public.}

Directly from 'MEIN KAMPF'when Adolf was nearly immortalized in Germany not too long ago by an infatuated, brainwashed public audience. HITLER'S -"My Life"

"THE STATE MUST DECLARE THE CHILDREN TO BE THE MOST PRECIOUS TREASURE OF THE PEOPLE. AS LONG AS THE GOVT IS PERCEIVED AS WORKING FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CHILDREN, THE PEOPLE WILL HAPPILY ENDURE ALMOST ANY CURTAILMENT OF LIBERTY,AND ALMOST ANY DEPRIVATION.

Folks, we all love our kids, But when you trot them out on stage to be used as props for your political agenda-as history has shown [these are kids]it is often used as a tool to hide a more rabid agenda
We need to wake up before we have drones flying over our homes in this country taking away our 4th ammendment rights-they are now trying to take away our second ammendment rights -a little at a time-so we dont notice it. IMHO
.
wv native

White Sulphur Springs, WV

#11238 Mar 2, 2013
( CHEROKEE MOUNTAIN LADY ) you are right what I do not under stand the government does not have money to pay our country's bill's they sat how in the world can they send $ 60 million over sea's in aide to somebody else ?????? can somebody tell me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakvale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Podiatrist (Sep '12) Apr 21 ShirleyWill12 11
Oakvale Music Thread (Dec '13) Apr 14 Musikologist 4
shakers bar (May '09) Jan '15 huge046 30
Lazy Men (Oct '14) Oct '14 gross 3
Drug bust up cheesy creek. (Aug '14) Aug '14 Curious 1
The best looking women in Oakvale? (May '14) Jun '14 Momma 4
Stephanie surface (Apr '14) Jun '14 Redneck girl 2
More from around the web

Oakvale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]