California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,879 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

BurnOuts

Covina, CA

#15481 Mar 4, 2013
No One but George Ogden of West Covina, California is responsible for the HATEFUL RACISTS words he chose to use in his Februrary 14 - 20, 2013 newspaper article. sgvexaminer.com page B1.

Of course the newspaper owner should have been aware and mindful of the racists language Geprge Ogden chose to use in his racists articles o the past.

George Ogden is also a great friend of the current andf former Glendora, California city council and city hall.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#15482 Mar 4, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>All you do is speak right from the Government and big insurance/Pharmacy platform. Stop acting like something you wanted to be in life. Will you answer the question? If you had a normally healthy baby again, would you pump dangerous chemicals into it's blood stream every year of it's life just to prevent the flu when there is no epidemic? yes or no.
I don’t care what the Swedish government thinks, or the British government, or the US government, they are not in charge of those journal publications your "scientists" avoid like the plague.

I know why they are afraid of peer review even if you don’t.

You can’t make money off the ignorant if your "theory" is actually put to the test. But you can by populating conspiracy theory websites you love so much, and other lists of "scientists" many of which have no idea their names are on such lists.

I know... I pointed it out to one of them, they were horrified.

I know you think everything is a conspiracy, that Obama is hiding under your bed.

Most of us don’t live with your childish delusions.

You are a believer, you want so much to believe in these outlandish conspiracy theories, and your religion, and what have you, you are eager to absorb any misdirection any of these websites hand you. And they know it.
BrassO

Covina, CA

#15483 Mar 4, 2013
Brass pipes were cool.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15484 Mar 4, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t care what the Swedish government thinks, or the British government, or the US government, they are not in charge of those journal publications your "scientists" avoid like the plague.
I know why they are afraid of peer review even if you don’t.
You can’t make money off the ignorant if your "theory" is actually put to the test. But you can by populating conspiracy theory websites you love so much, and other lists of "scientists" many of which have no idea their names are on such lists.
I know... I pointed it out to one of them, they were horrified.
I know you think everything is a conspiracy, that Obama is hiding under your bed.
Most of us don’t live with your childish delusions.
You are a believer, you want so much to believe in these outlandish conspiracy theories, and your religion, and what have you, you are eager to absorb any misdirection any of these websites hand you. And they know it.
Don't be so afraid old man, you scared to answer a simple question? why you hiding fool? Speak for yourself and what the government says. You don't speak for educated people.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15485 Mar 4, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t care what the Swedish government thinks, or the British government, or the US government, they are not in charge of those journal publications your "scientists" avoid like the plague.
I know why they are afraid of peer review even if you don’t.
You can’t make money off the ignorant if your "theory" is actually put to the test. But you can by populating conspiracy theory websites you love so much, and other lists of "scientists" many of which have no idea their names are on such lists.
I know... I pointed it out to one of them, they were horrified.
I know you think everything is a conspiracy, that Obama is hiding under your bed.
Most of us don’t live with your childish delusions.
You are a believer, you want so much to believe in these outlandish conspiracy theories, and your religion, and what have you, you are eager to absorb any misdirection any of these websites hand you. And they know it.
Thank you for proving me right, you can't answer a simple question...lol

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15486 Mar 4, 2013
Increasingly over the years, we are witnessing the appearance of “scientific” studies that are little more than commercials, public relation sound bytes, to promote vaccination’s efficacy. Today a highly flawed medical trial conducted by a pharmaceutical corporation has a greater chance of being published in a more prestigious medical journal than does medical designed research conducted by an independent scientist without conflicts of interest with government or private industries. When we question why this would be the case, we can only draw the conclusion that such research is more often than not promotional spin designed to support the financial interests of the corporate party. This is particularly true of vaccine science, and is solely published in order to influence the nation’s health policy makers and physicians, and to relieve doubts concerning their vaccine’s efficacy and safety. The nation’s health agencies then rely on these fabrications to convince the larger public healthcare community and citizens about the importance of vaccination. And this scenario is particularly true for the flu vaccine.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15487 Mar 4, 2013
There is only one big question that needs to be answered: what is the real gold standard proof to claim that the flu vaccine is efficacious for any given individual? The question whether or not the flu vaccine is safe becomes secondary if the vaccine’s efficacy is negligible or useless. In that case, there would be no convincing scientific rationale for administering the vaccine in the first place. During the past four years, since the hype and subsequent fizzle of the H1N1 scare in 2008, we have done an extensive review of the scientific literature and analysis of flu vaccination, and the results are startling.



In a recent interview with Dr. Thomas Jefferson, coordinator for the Cochrane Vaccine Field in Rome, Italy, he said that in 2009 he conducted a thorough review of 217 published studies on flu vaccines and found only 5% reliable. In other words, 95% of studies on flu vaccination are flawed and should therefore be ignored. This should not come as a great surprise; even CDC officials were forced to confess that “influenza vaccines are still among the least effective immunizing agents available, and this seems to be particularly true for elderly recipients.”[1] Dr. Anthony Morris, a distinguished virologist and a former Chief Vaccine Office at the FDA, found “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.’ Dr. Morris states,“The producers of these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15488 Mar 4, 2013
The CDC’s website states,“if you are pregnant, a flu shot is your best protection against serious illness from the flu. A flu shot can protect pregnant women, their unborn babies and even the baby after birth.” Is there any scientific truth to this claim?

Come on big mouth d, give us some proof? Where is it published? Because all information has to be published in a journal...lol. I know you think everything is truth from the great Obama, lies hide in your brain. Why do u lie so much?

Most of us don’t live with your childish delusions.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15489 Mar 4, 2013
When the CDC launched new swine flu vaccine in 2009, it recommended children as young as 6 months be vaccinated. All FDA-approved intramuscular flu vaccines comprise an inactivated virus. So is there any evidence that inactivated viral influenza vaccines are effective in very young children?

Answer the question big mouth d. Show us the journals. Back your mouth or just do as most of us predict, just lie and insult.
BrassO

Covina, CA

#15490 Mar 5, 2013
So why do you think they did it that way?

Was there a plan behind all this?

Just where did they cook all this up at in the first place?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15491 Mar 6, 2013
A study in England has strengthened evidence from Scandinavia that a vaccine used to prevent pandemic flu boosted the risk of sleep disorder among teens and children, doctors said on Tuesday.

Using the Pandemrix vaccine increased the risk of narcolepsy among people aged four to 18 by a factor of 14 compared to those who did not get the jab, they said.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15492 Mar 6, 2013
Two years to the day after CSL's Fluvax was banned for use in children under the age of 5, news has emerged that Australian doctors are continuing to administer this shot to infants and toddlers despite the fact that there are four other vaccines that are licensed for use in this age group.

Originally, it was discovered that the rate of febrile convulsions following Fluvax was 10 times higher than the 'expected' rate and was causing seizures in 1 child in 100. As a result, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia, Jim Bishop, banned the vaccine for use in children under five and current recommendations state that it should only be used in children between five and 10 years of age if no other vaccination is available.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15493 Mar 6, 2013
A new scientific study published in The Lancet reveals that influenza vaccines only prevent influenza in 1.5 out of every 100 adults who are injected with the flu vaccine. Yet, predictably, this report is being touted by the quack science community, the vaccine-pushing CDC and the scientifically-inept mainstream media as proof that "flu vaccines are 60% effective!"

This absurd claim was repeated across the mainstream media over the past few days, with all sorts of sloppy reporting that didn't even bother to read the study itself (as usual).

It was published! It was published!
Rain

Covina, CA

#15494 Mar 6, 2013
The magical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?
G points

Covina, CA

#15496 Mar 7, 2013
A all know a "d" is below average, so can't have anymore of this being posted here since it sets a bad example for other readers to follow.
Jillian Galloway

Chester, VA

#15497 Mar 7, 2013
It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!

In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.

It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#15498 Mar 7, 2013
Jillian Galloway wrote:
It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!
In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.
while I agree pot should be legal, I didn't realize we elected the Marxist a second time because of the pot issue?
Trains

Covina, CA

#15499 Mar 7, 2013
The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?
ThomasA

Birmingham, AL

#15500 Mar 8, 2013
Jillian Galloway wrote:
In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.
Step forward and come up with a 100% accurate non-invasive field test that will stand up in court to show THC content in someone suspected of using MJ like the BAT used in alcohol tests. Until that time, companies with a zero policy and police suspecting a DUI will have to put up with positive/negative results and act accordingly.
BeekerBeeker

Covina, CA

#15501 Mar 8, 2013
The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?

I was under the impression the bus would be yellow in color?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sacramento Gas Prices Creeping Up 21 hr Israel Did 911 2
News Extend your reach with ESL products Apr 24 Julie Jane 1
News 5-year-old girl who wants a birthday card from ... Apr 24 Julie Jane 1
News Suspect Caught on Cell Phone Video Attempting t... Apr 24 Julie Jane 1
News Rescue group takes in mutilated pup injured by ... Apr 24 Julie Jane 1
News Puppy Found with Ears Cut Off Fighting Potentia... Apr 24 Julie Jane 1
News League of Women Voters honors community stars Apr 24 Lucy Ann Jane 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages