I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike<quoted text>
You are the one changing the subject, not I.
Your original assertion was that "Clinton's impeachment failed". Now you've changed it to "the intent and objectives failed". Two very different things.
The impeachment did not "fail the votes in the Senate" for the 50th time jackass, that is the House's sole power.
Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. You are wrong.
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying