California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,879 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Big D

Modesto, CA

#14050 Dec 19, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, a woman should have the right to use her body in any way. I'm for prostitution to be legal too. So you don't mind paying for your neighborhood slut that uses abortion as birth control? YOu want BIG Gov. out of your life but want BIG Gov involved in your life? And you voted for big Gov the last election? lol...
You can be for whatever you want to be, this is America and I am a patriot, but there are people that will have difficulty ever getting my vote

Those people are for
Tax breaks for people that least need tax breaks, on the backs of the middle class.
Restrictions on a woman’s rights to her own body and reproductive system.
Religion in front of established science in education
Restricting people from marrying who they choose

The list goes on, but those usually will rule out at least one candidate.

No candidate fits everything I would want them to represent me on, so I pick the one that comes closest.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14051 Dec 19, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
There might not be a post where you said "Clinton was not impeached" in those exact words but there are many where you said his impeachment failed.
And there are also many where you say he was impeached. Which is it? Can't be both.
I asked you to be clear. Your post above is as clear as mud! It doesn't take 300 words to tell us. Was Clinton impeached or did it fail?
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike

Yes he was impeached

After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment

You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.

He was impeached

And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.

Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.

It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14052 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
1100 bills is a landslide of legislation, hardly something to easily dismiss, like you just did.
all you have to do is type in to the google machine "bills that restrict women's health care" and im sure youd get 20000 pages of hits......
youd only be ignorant to this issue if you were say, a silly old tea bagging fool, who lives under a rock, somewhere near elk grove, ca
sorry I forgot you were afraid of real cyberspace..
you know, the one where they tell you real world facts??
inconvienient to your reality as they may be??????
Wanna buy some question marks cheap? I notice you use a lot.

HAR!HAR!HAR! Andy. What a dope! Won't debate with me! Scared!

HA HA! Gotcha Again!
Andre has a Posse

Santa Cruz, CA

#14053 Dec 19, 2012
Didn't losing strategically to win get some Chinese athletes disqualified from the Olympics?
You pathetic zipper necks (my way's not very sportsmanlike.)
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#14054 Dec 19, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Wanna buy some question marks cheap? I notice you use a lot.
HAR!HAR!HAR! Andy. What a dope! Won't debate with me! Scared!
HA HA! Gotcha Again!
you wont debate with me, because your a Pu&&y of the highest order.

big mouth, yet nothing to back it up with!!

sad.

ive seen too many of you before..

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14055 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
you wont debate with me, because your a Pu&&y of the highest order.
big mouth, yet nothing to back it up with!!
sad.
ive seen too many of you before..
Where?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14056 Dec 19, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
You are the one changing the subject, not I.

Your original assertion was that "Clinton's impeachment failed". Now you've changed it to "the intent and objectives failed". Two very different things.

The impeachment did not "fail the votes in the Senate" for the 50th time jackass, that is the House's sole power.

Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. You are wrong.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14057 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
you wont debate with me, because your a Pu&&y of the highest order.
big mouth, yet nothing to back it up with!!
sad.
ive seen too many of you before..
Don't be sad jackass! Here, maybe this will help-

gonond

Masontown, PA

#14058 Dec 19, 2012
youtube.com/watch... …
World Smallest Violin Funny
KeyStone

La Puente, CA

#14059 Dec 19, 2012
Look around, your still preachng to the wind, or haven't you stopped long enough to look for yourself.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14060 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
the democrats are the party of BIG governemnt, tea bagger??
Sorry I don't drink much tea, I know that I should, but mostly coffee. So my answer is no. I agree the D's are the party of Big Government.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14061 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>

or vaginal probes in virginia??
That is a lot of V.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14062 Dec 19, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
1100 bills is a landslide of legislation, hardly something to easily dismiss, like you just did.
all you have to do is type in to the google machine "bills that restrict women's health care" and im sure youd get 20000 pages of hits......
youd only be ignorant to this issue if you were say, a silly old tea bagging fool, who lives under a rock, somewhere near elk grove, ca
sorry I forgot you were afraid of real cyberspace..
you know, the one where they tell you real world facts??
inconvienient to your reality as they may be??????
Can you be specific on what bill you are talking about? Did you just hear something in the wind again? You post shit then never are able to answer simple questions. Why can't you find just one bill if there are so many? The campaign is over you don't need to keep spitting the stupid scare tactics. You got to be on more then just pot.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#14063 Dec 19, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You can be for whatever you want to be, this is America and I am a patriot, but there are people that will have difficulty ever getting my vote
Those people are for
Tax breaks for people that least need tax breaks, on the backs of the middle class.
Restrictions on a woman’s rights to her own body and reproductive system.
Religion in front of established science in education
Restricting people from marrying who they choose
The list goes on, but those usually will rule out at least one candidate.
No candidate fits everything I would want them to represent me on, so I pick the one that comes closest.
Yes let's take religion out of schools...great idea. How is that working, we want God out of our schools but when something bad happens we ask where was God? Why don't we impeach Obama for praying at a school? Did that hurt your feelings mr bigot man? Are you for plural marriage?
MyansBoehner

La Puente, CA

#14064 Dec 19, 2012
Leading U.S. anti-tax activist (antiAmerican pro muslim) Grover Norquist gave his blessing on Wednesday to House Speaker John Boehner's
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14066 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one changing the subject, not I.
Your original assertion was that "Clinton's impeachment failed". Now you've changed it to "the intent and objectives failed". Two very different things.
The impeachment did not "fail the votes in the Senate" for the 50th time jackass, that is the House's sole power.
Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. You are wrong.
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#14067 Dec 20, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
Maybe the intent of the impeachment failed (do we even really know what the intent was?) but the impeachment DID NOT FAIL. The Senate doesn't have the power to pass or fail an impeachment. That is the sole power of the House.

Clinton was impeached. You are wrong. The impeachment did not "fail".
Look it up, it's history. Clinton was definitely impeached.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14068 Dec 20, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe the intent of the impeachment failed (do we even really know what the intent was?) but the impeachment DID NOT FAIL. The Senate doesn't have the power to pass or fail an impeachment. That is the sole power of the House.
Clinton was impeached. You are wrong. The impeachment did not "fail".
Look it up, it's history. Clinton was definitely impeached.
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying
Big3ers

La Puente, CA

#14070 Dec 20, 2012
The Battle over the 'Big 3" appears to be underway, but we can always add another
Big D

Modesto, CA

#14071 Dec 20, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Yes let's take religion out of schools...great idea. How is that working, we want God out of our schools but when something bad happens we ask where was God? Why don't we impeach Obama for praying at a school? Did that hurt your feelings mr bigot man? Are you for plural marriage?
I don’t want my children worshiping your religion any more than you want your children kneeling on prayer rugs facing mecca and praying to Allah 5 times a day

You keep your religion out of the schools of my children and grandchildren and I will help keep other religions out as well.

You can go believe in Santa-Jesus all you want, I have no problem with people choosing Christianity, or Islam, or Scientology or Wicca or worshiping a volcano god on their own, but you won’t preach it to my children from a position of authority ( like a teacher )... Not going to happen.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Modesto Mugshots and Criminal Arrest Records Sep 23 anonymous 4
News Fraud claims coming to court (Jun '07) Sep 21 Your Service Prov... 5
Felony charges likely against... (Jan '16) Sep 20 Your service Prov... 12
Stanislaus County Superior Court Sep 20 Your service Prov... 5
Yosemite Murders Sep 16 Lost In 1999 1
News Linda Ronstadt gained fame with pop songs, but ... (Nov '08) Sep 16 DARK TRIAD MAN 15
Wanted on 242 PC Charges Aug '16 KES 8

Oakdale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages